There are too many low-IQ, low-self control, no-class, easily triggered people on X. They don't even read what I wrote, but flip out over what the gremlins in their head are saying. There is no point in engaging with these people. So I won't anymore.
If you call names, you are admitting you are low-IQ, no-class, and are incapable of rational thought or speech. Those that wish harm on other people are all of that and criminal on top of it. If you spew racism, you are all of that and vile as well.
I won't engage anymore. I will report you and block you. Go spew your hate somewhere else. You don't affect me. But you are wasting my time. And you are not worth that.
If I've blocked you, this message is about you.
You are the WORST! You ruin apps. You ruin websites! You make sure customers CAN'T get through. Viruses are more useful than your crappy Cloudflare software!!!
I've stopped using several companies because of you. I hope companies wake up and ditch you and you cease to exist.
You are the Ebola on the butt of the Internet. Please just go away!!!
The same thing happens with all these guys. At some point, they’ll realize all of Christianity is Jewish, and they’ll turn to Gnosticism, paganism, or occultism. Only a matter of time.
Watched the French-Stuckey debate. My main takeaway: The whole debate centered upon a truth-emotion continuum. I think Allie Beth came out ahead for one main reason that colors every issue debated: She indexes her understanding of emotion and empathy on a biblical axis, whereas French elevates emotion and empathy to a disproportionate degree. The consequence is to unmoor emotion from truth. There's simply a difference in rhetorical strategy: Stuckey focuses more on logos; French on pathos. Along those lines, another reason I think Allie Beth had the stronger hand is that she refuses to play the game of pitting love against truth (1 Cor. 13:6; Eph. 4:15). She's no less interested in kindness or empathy, but properly indexed by Scripture. French's focus on catering to emotional equilibrium (and thus hewing to progressive niceties) requires him to blur biblical categories.
Biblical ethics requires both logos and pathos, but our loves must be ordered and governed with a proper foundation. And notably, French's empathy tends in one direction, toward those to his left.
In short, Allie Beth focused on objectivity, reason, and right and wrong as the grounds of what constitutes love and kindness, whereas French's instinct is to defer to emotion and aesthetics.
Why did God create Adam and Eve knowing they would sin? Well, we could ask that same question about us. Why do we as parents have kids knowing they will sin? Because we know that, despite the fact that our kids are going to do evil, they can still do good.
So evil can’t exist unless good exists. But good can’t exist unless God exists. In other words, there can be no objective evil unless there is objective good, and there can be no objective good unless God exists. If evil is real, and we all know it is, then God exists.
HE chose to marry her.
HE chose to have children with her.
HE believed in her.
HE knew she could handle this.
HE chose her to be his successor.
It is so clear to me that when Charlie was murdered, the hope was for @TPUSA to be taken down with him. What they didn’t know, was that Charlie married a fighter. She is standing in their way which is why they want to take her down as well but she isn’t letting that happen.
She has shown an amount of grace and courage that seems unimaginable, yet HE knew she had the strength to do the unimaginable! #CharlieKirk #ErikaKirk
NARRATOR: JK Rowling had never met Jolyon Maugham. They were never friends. Her close friends remained her close friends. Jolyon Maugham remained a fixated loon.
"You cannot be on the receiving end of government largess and also position yourself as a brave fighter of the system. You ARE the system."
Jenny Holland (@SemperFemina21) on the kind of profoundly illiberal arts establishment that cosplays bravery.
https://t.co/ZU57otmPKk
@Meldougherty77 And it applies to Candace. However, Candace makes tabloids, The National Inquirer, and tinfoil hat "Hitler's brain is alive in a jar" wackos seem reasonable by comparison.
Can someone please hand this man a Bible?
Anybody can love Jesus. False prophets "love" Jesus. That's easy.
Now fall down on your face and worship him as God. Tucker is one of those people in charge who doesn't want you to know this, but Muslims hate the real Jesus.