@lucaseduar34120@XexaUsa Sem base kkkk, btc nunca na história fez novo fundo depois de romper média de 50 que era nós 83 para confirmar e ele pregando baixa no mercado kkkkk, com certeza perdeu o trem
@mirceabrs It already hit 57k; if you didn't buy, that's on you—whoever wanted to, took advantage of it. If it gets there again, I'll be back at break-even, and if it doesn't drop, even better; I don't care about these short-term scenarios.
@dydtjd0953@centrifuge@rwasummit@itsbhaji That's why I left the project.
They abandoned CFG, went for stocks and killed decentralization.
Profit on stocks = taxes.
Crypto = self-custody and sell without KYC.
@dydtjd0953@centrifuge@rwasummit@itsbhaji What matters now are the shares, not CFG on exchanges. CFG will still have little utility. If you believe in the project, I’d consider the shares instead. Personally, I’m out because of the loss of decentralization.
@centrifuge If the conversion happens, the equity could gain value with the company’s success, while the remaining CFG may lose value and liquidity. Crypto users value decentralization and the freedom to hold assets in self-custody.
@centrifuge It's better to keep CFG as a crypto token and give it more utility to absorb inflationary pressure while continuing to generate liquid and accessible value in the market.
@offerijns@centrifuge
Governance-only token with no real utility still has 3% inflation. Foundation runs everything while diluting holders.
Protocol grows and the token just dilutes. Zero real value accrual. Holders treated like decoration.