@SandraRodkey Buckle up.
2 1/2 years to go before you'll have the chance to vote for millions to be imported, without criminals records being checked, to rob, rape & murder Americans.
Again.
@BasedMikeLee@DoryBeutel What is the honest, true reason for why Senator John Thune & a small number of other Republicans refuse to follow Senator Lee's Step 1 & Step 2 listed above?
Simple formula for passing the SAVE America Act:
(1) Put it on the Senate floor for debate
(2) Keep debating it—as long as it takes, for many weeks, if necessary—until it passes
Yes, it takes time
But it’s worth it—saving America is worth it
@FmrRepMTG Lol. What will be the topic of tomorrow's negative revenge post, ragging on your old team?
You've let yourself become so predicible & banal now.
The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.
@ggreenwald Glenn is pretty open-minded.
But his rabid antisemitism has gotten him to where he's fine with knowingly wearing a nazi tattoo for 20 years, fully supporting the holocaust during which 6 million jews were murdered.
@MiaForTrump Well, giving a thumbs up would be acknowledging that you're an uninformed fool who allows their views to be shaped by the dishonest & unethical hacks on MSNBC...so NO.
@mtgreenee The topic is unimportant; you're intent is to draft negative posts every day, attacking President Trump & Republicans (your old team).
What's tomorrow's whining going to be about?
@micah_erfan You'd think they'd have installed some journalists with integrity instead of the unethical and dishonest leftist attack dogs they employ and the senior excecutives, who hand them their phoney, anti-republican scripts.
@HowardKurtz Welker is rude and attacking, but only against Republicans.
She works to elect Democrats. Why?
That's what the senior executives pay her to do.
Do you guys in the Senate, where you are the MAJORITY, ever actually do anything about this overt criminal behavior?
Rhetorical question, of course.
No, you just talk and talk and talk and…
DO NOTHING.