From 2001 (China joins the WTO) to 2012, every dollar in increased imports of manufactured goods from China corresponded to a $1.41 increase (not decrease) in U.S. manufacturing GDP. Since then, U.S. manufacturing growth has far outpaced imports of manufactured goods from China.
People should have a better understanding of statistics. By that, I don't mean "you should go take a stats course." I mean, "people should understand what certain statistics actually mean."
The Import Price Index is one such statistic and my latest @aier Explainer provides exactly this:
https://t.co/4PjCez8iLl
Should you encourage your kids to take on debt for college? @DrPaulMueller poses this practical question to @DrJeffDegner and @Dave_Hebert in the newest episode of The Economist Next Door.
Great. Here are three policy reforms that would actually address these issues:
1) Lift the tariffs. America already has the most productive manufacturing workers on the planet, bar none. Let them have access to the materials they need to do the work they can do.
2) Look into permitting/regulatory reform so that we can get American miners to work doing actual mining instead of mountains of paperwork and navigating bureaucratic red tape. Same goes for refining.
3) Repeal the Jones Act so that we can actually ship things around the country more effectively. It's absurd that New England has a harder time getting natural gas from Texas than virtually any other place on the planet. The Jones Act is what stands in the way of addressing this.
.@SecScottBessent: "A nation that cannot manufacture, mine, ship, or refine its needs gradually cedes its strength and sovereignty to others. That is a dangerous dependency for any country; it is an unacceptable one for the United States of America."
With all due respect, @USTradeRep, since Adam Smithโs time, good theory has helped us understand what happens to the real economy when it is impacted by the type of mercantilist policies that the #Trump administration is pursuing: massive opportunity costs, severe misallocation of #capital, #cronyism on stilts, and declining competitiveness. The costs of all this are borne by consumers - ie 335 million Americans.๐บ๐ธ
If you want to do something concrete about #affordability for #businesses and #consumers, may I suggest that you
1) reverse the present trajectory of US #tradepolicy and stop penalizing Americans from trading with whom they want, and cease the kowtowing to lobbyists seeking privileges for special interests as well as trade lawyers whose very existence (and incomes) depends upon a complicated and difficult-to-navigate tariff schedule.
2) discontinue the use of #industrialpolicy that is just as susceptible to cronyism and pours taxpayer dollars into sectors where there is little to no demand but where there are plenty of rent seekers anxious to persuade everyone that their particular line of business is somehow a vital national security concern.
As for your call for richer empirical tools in @IMFNews, the tools we have for studying trade are quite good, and, thanks to them, we have a very solid grasp of how free trade progressively enriches the United States and discourages Americans and American businesses from becoming uncompetitive and thinking that the world somehow owes us a living.
Certainly, good economic theory, sound empirical inquiry, and the tools with which they furnish us, are always in a state of development. They should be open to critique because that is one way we grow in our understanding of how the real economy works.
But we donโt change the tools because they give us results that some may not like. Indeed, part of the job of economists is to tell us what we may not want to hear: that trade offs are real; that interfering with the price system blinds us to the realities of supply and demand; that undermining property rights damages the general welfare; that #tariffs undermine our competitiveness, etc.
Ignoring these truths serves neither sound inquiry nor the formulation of good policy. And in no world is that good for the #UnitedStates ๐บ๐ธ
My daughter taught me a lesson about Memorial Day that I'll never forget. I'm sharing wisdom that came from the 'mouth of a babe' 18 years ago in today's @thedailyeconomy from @aier :
https://t.co/nB3qhaO5pz
I've been having a TON of fun using Claude to write Substack posts based on lecture slides I developed over the years. I will continue trying to figure out how to list Claude as a co-author:
https://t.co/DC8Q9TTbqD
.@Roger_Koppl writes fascinating stuff and is one of those authors who constantly makes me think. Roger's co-authored paper here should be read by anyone who cares about AI and its effect(s) going forward.
I'm very happy "Why Claude is conscious" got 185 downloads in its first 7 days on Phil Papers. I'm told that's a good number. Available here:
https://t.co/ddawDgD64w
My @aier colleague, @DrPaulMueller, and I argue that trade policy over the past 15 months looks more like vigilantism than "justice" and that this has caused serious problems.
A snippet:
https://t.co/jXTTyXdr9Q
Here's the obvious: people don't like to get fired.
Here's the not so obvious: sometimes, there is asymmetric accountability, and that can produce some otherwise weird-looking results.
My latest with @Econlib: https://t.co/RLskwRgu1p
The whack-a-mole tariffs continue. The likely next step? Section 338, a Depression-era statute. But this, too, has problems not the least of which being a skeptical court.
My latest with @aier in @thedailyeconomy:
https://t.co/ziDkK3QqUJ