@JaydonShawwx@ChrisMartzWX "The Earth is warming up quickly"
"The data supporting your assertion that the Earth is warming up quickly is flawed. Here's my evidence for that".
"Yeah but why is the Earth warming up so quickly?"
And here I was hoping for a debate๐
I want to kill myself every time I read anything written by an Anthropic model. How it is even possible for an LLM to write worse than every person alive?
Please, anyone, release a model that is as capable as Opus so that I can walk away from Anthropic and never look back.
@GarandThumb1 AI for the everyman is nearly peaked. Businesses need 'gud enough'. We're already there. Market pressure now points to faster & cheaper, not smarter.
Govs will ban uncensored models citing nat. security. Instead of being democratized, info will be gated like a google search.
@News2ATeam@GunOwners @DAGToddBlanche @MorosKostas There are two kinds of people. Those who take an oath to protect & defend the constitution, and those who can defer their judgment to someone else on the matter.
I take issue with people who are the former but invoke the privledges of the latter.
The Second Amendment is a hedge, and like every hedge, its critics call it wasteful right up until the day it pays out.
Insurance always looks unnecessary in good times. Thankfully for us, the Founders priced in the bad times.
@gunpolicy Funny how Shrieking Sherrill thinks both can be true:
1. AR rifles are so proliferous that they drive crime.
2. Her modest experience using an AR gives her a unique, authoritative viewpoint.
@Brownhole_Captl@gunpolicy That doesn't even come close to describing the significant of the order.
The state was forced to 'admit' all of the 'requests for admissions' propounded on them.
I haven't read the RFAs. But they typically include things like 'admit the law is unconstitutional'.
@JonathanTurley The abundance of negative parallelisms, dramatic staccato sentences & autistic attempts a aphorism makes the opinion read strongly as something made by an AI.
Given the source, this is not too surprising. Hawaii might do better to replace their justices with AI.
@peterrhague I interpret thid behavior as assault. The 'solution' is to treat it as assault with a deadly weapon: prosecute it as assault & do not prosecute anyone responding to it as such (i.e. with deadly force).
@2AFDN I don't know. It's really vague. By 'people', James Madison probably meant 'the militia'.
Sorry. I wanted to see what it was like to have brain damage. Not recommended.
@cafreiman A family income of $100,001 is not high by any definition, other than apparently the Cencus Bureau. It completely overlooks purchasing power.