The House will pass a $12 billion bailout for farmers suffering from high fuel & fertilizer prices caused by the Iran War, expensive equipment & parts caused by tariffs, and lower sales prices for commodities due to trade disputes with China.
But the GOP is fighting communism!
Massie: "I don't think the problem is that our elections aren't secure because we control the House, Senate, White House, and to some degree we control the Supreme Court. So I ask my Republican colleagues, why are you complaining about election fraud? We won all the damn elections!"
(🚨) PROOF EXCLUSIVE: I’ve published 1,500+ pages of bestsellers on the coup plot Trump is about to move to Stage 2. One-sentence or one-post summaries do it no justice.
🔗: https://t.co/Z7qVGLEWMy
This lengthy report will fully prepare you for what’s coming Thursday—please RT.
@Barbara05385017@Gennifer30@allenanalysis another idiot with no rational thinking process (illustrated in their Xbio) who cannot comprehend two states can exist at the same time. Walk and chew gum much?
@STrinity45@ChaosTV The difference is that there is a very strong likelihood that absolutely nothing adverse will happen to you as a result of the recordings from cars and buildings. The unknown here is what will happen with the video taken by a random stranger. Doesn’t that make your point moot?
@PaulRoundy1@SethAbramson So Trump is incorrect about this? Makes me wonder what a guy like you were thinking when Trump grabbed the sharpie and predicted the direction of Dorian. 🙄
It is not defamation. Not even close.
It is not false to state that a man who forcibly inserted his fingers into a non-consenting woman’s vagina has raped her. That’s because, as the distinguished district judge in Carroll v. Trump explained more than once, and as dictionaries confirm, the word “rape” is broad enough to encompass forcible, involuntary penetration of the vagina or anus by fingers or some foreign object, even if under the specific criminal code provisions of some (but not all) jurisdictions, non-penile penetration is categorized as sexual abuse or sodomy.
It is therefore not defamation to state that a man who, like @realDonaldTrump, was found unanimously by a federal jury to have forcibly inserted his fingers into a non-consenting woman’s vagina, is an adjudicated rapist. Because he is.
But even if the word “rape” were categorically defined to exclude non-penile penetration (which it is not), the description of Trump as an adjudicated rapist would not be actionable under the defamation-law doctrine of “substantial truth,” which provides that, if the gist, or sting, of a challenged statement is not significantly different in reputational effect from the actual facts, there can be no liability. And here there can be no serious argument that committing forcible sexual abuse is any less morally reprehensible or reputationally damaging than committing forcible rape.
So it’s a fact and not defamatory to state that Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist. He may be an adjudicated digital rapist, to be more precise, but he’s still a rapist, and it’s long past time that people stop pretending that he isn’t and wasn’t found to be one—or that forcible sexual abuse is somehow more tolerable than forcible rape.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
@rascalman4@kylegriffin1 “stubborn, confused, psychotic, tranny, simple minded”… a Christ Follower empties his dictionary of negative attributes, but fails to comprehend the complete lack of cognitive reasoning behind his own attribute.