Exactly.
same playbook. same recycled lines.
“no exit wound” and “.30-06 sealed it” got deunked decades ago on MLK and they’re still running it.
people know the truth.
🚨 BREAKING
@shiloheffort just blew the lid off this FAKE screenshot pushed by Andrew Shillson.
I can now confirm: if the photos @paleochristcon posted are real, those messages should not exist.
Why?
The screenshot he showed clearly says the chat is set to AUTO‑DELETE after 6 months.
If that’s true, those messages would have literally disappeared by now.
For comparison: here is my chat with @tylerbowyer — you can see the exact same icon, but his is set to 7 days / 1w. Same UI, same setting location.
You can’t have it both ways:
Either the auto‑delete setting is fake…
or the “receipts” are 🤷♂️
🚨 If AI can easily understand my work, then I know the top accounts in the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation can understand it too.
This was a military operation that SOLD you a narrative of Tyler Robinson.
👀 He wasn't even supposed to be the only patsy.
There were others.
The operation was a failed mass shooter operation, where the bullet was never supposed to come out of Charlie's neck.
And the device that was set to detonate with as much damage as the pager attacks, complete failed and misfired in the SUV on the way to the hospital.
So all they were left with was a hole in the neck, and no one else shot...
I already showed the other infrared beams on Dan Flood, and Phil Lyman when he finally walked out of the building.
I truly believe that Phil Lyman MISSING Charlie Kirk's assassination, combined with the microphone NOT detonating, saved this country from a Civil War.
🔑 If Phil was where he was supposed to be, on cue, he may not be here with us today.
He was the closest government official to the shooter on the rooftop...
He just walked out of the building a few seconds too late.
A few seconds earlier, and they would have said that Tyler Robinson shot him too...
There's no other reason that an infrared beam was in the location where Phil Lyman went to stand after he walked out of the building.
There was just no way to pull the trigger because the so-called shooter on the roof had already fled.
If Phil would have been outside, I truly believe it would have been Charlie, Phil, and Dan who all got shot first.
And then I believe it would have been innocent bystanders next.
Instead, we got this failed operation that took Charlie Kirk's life with two simultaneous shots, and infrared beams on multiple people!!
This is an area that the larger accounts do not want to tackle.
One look at my videos and you'll quickly understand how much information you're missing out on!
It's not difficult to understand once you see it...
It may sound wild, but when you see both entry holes and both exit holes, you'll know what's real and you'll know who's fake.
I'm not ducking anybody, but there are a lot of the independent investigators that are ducking CKO322.
And for good reason.
They know they can't get past the two entry holes and the two exit holes that are discovered in Charlie Kirk: Operation 322.
This was a military operation on behalf of Israel and the United States.
🔑 Charlie Kirk's hole in the neck was not an entry wound, it was an exit wound.
I can prove this to anyone in the world.
🤣 So don't be fooled by this little AI diagram!
I REALLY have the goods to back up my claims.
And that's why I've been in this space for a year without being debunked.
I've been saying two shots for almost a year now, and the autopsy findings back me up.
They won't talk to you about the parietal lobe hemorrhaging, because then you'll start asking questions like...
"Did Charlie get shot in the back of the head?"
They simply won't talk about it, and then they'll skip right over it while they're reading autopsy findings on air.
You better read that last statement again.... 🥚
Tell your favorite Charlie Kirk assassination researcher that I'm up for a debate.
🔑 Any debate with any of the top accounts who will not embrace the infrared beam that I discovered on the back of Charlie Kirk's head at the time of his assassination...
That is the single most important piece of physical evidence that has ever been presented since the beginning of the Charlie Kirk assassination.
🔥 AN INFRARED BEAM ON THE BACK OF CHARLIE KIRK'S HEAD SHOULD CHANGE EVERYTHING ABOUT THIS CASE.
🫵🏾 Why do you think they're fighting me so hard to keep me from getting this information to YOU?!
I'll tell you why.
🔑 Charlie Kirk marks the first assassination of what they are going to do to all of us under Section 219 if we allow it to pass.
⚠️ Trump is a Jewish National Fund TROJAN HORSE for Israel.
It's time to wake up folks.
It's time.
📢 @RealCandaceO, the text messages actually don't matter much.
A picture of a phone, sent to a man who is not connected to Charlie, is NOT "evidence" at all.
Nobody wants to face the fact that Charlie was shot in the rear right of the head?!
https://t.co/ny3nRN5ldX
That's what this is really all about.
The neck wound is an exit wound.
Just watch the video. 🫴🏾
WHAT YOU'VE HEARD: "MLK was shot with a .30-06 and it didn't leave an exit wound."
(🔖Bookmark and share this. Arm yourself with the truth and information)
Both of the above claims are false. He wasn't shot with a .30-06 and there was indeed an exit wound. The confusion arises because the fedsloppers are repeating fedslop talking points from a previous conspiracy/cover-up ass*ssination. Peak irony. Garbage in, garbage out.
▪️CLAIM 1: "IT DIDN'T LEAVE AN EXIT WOUND"▪️
In 1976-79, the House Select Committee on Assassinations investigated the MLK assassination and determined the following:
1. Dr. Francisco's original autopsy was "DEFICIENT" because he never actually determined the complete bullet wound track. (see attachments below)
2. According to the committee's medical panel reconstruction, the bullet entered, exited & then re-entered according to this track:
1. INITIAL ENTRANCE: right cheek/face. The entrance was approximately 1 inch to the right and ½ inch below the corner of the mouth.
2. After passing through the cheek, the bullet struck and shattered the right jawbone.
3. EXIT: The bullet then exited through the bottom portion of the right side of the chin, LEAVING THE BODY.
4. Before re-entering the body, the bullet crossed through the upper-neck clothing. MLK's shirt collar was perforated and torn, his tie was completely torn in half, and the suit jacket lapel was struck tangentially in its edge, tearing the inner lining.
5. SECONDARY RE-ENTRY: The bullet re-entered the base of the neck just above the right collarbone.
6. From the neck re-entry, the bullet continued right-to-left, front-to-back, and downward, injuring the jugular vein, carotid artery, subclavian artery, and vertebral artery.
7. Additional soft-tissue injuries included a submucosal hemorrhage of the larynx and an intrapulmonary hematoma at the top of the right upper lung as consequences of being adjacent to the wound path, but they were not penetrated by the bullet itself.
8. As the bullet continued leftward/backward, the first and second ribs—particularly their posterior portions near where they join the spine—were fractured and displaced.
9. There was extensive destruction of bone around the lowest cervical and upper thoracic vertebrae, corresponding to C7 and T1, and there was a major, corresponding devastating spinal-cord injury.
10. The remaining bullet fragment continued into the left upper back and stopped just beneath the skin, approximately 3 inches left of the spinal midline. IOW, it very nearly exited the body a 2nd time.
BULLET PATH & DAMAGE SUMMARY:
Right cheek entrance → fractured right jaw → mouth → lower-right chin exit → shirt collar + tie + jacket lapel edge damage → neck re-entry above right clavicle → jugular vein + carotid/subclavian/vertebral arteries + major nerves → posterior 1st/2nd ribs → C7/T1 spinal column → severe spinal-cord injury → left upper back subcutaneous termination.
So the bullet entered, hit one of the strongest bones in the body, EXITED, then re-entered, did a ton more damage, and nearly exited again.
But even that's not the whole story.
▪️CLAIM #2: "HE WAS SHOT WITH A .30-06"▪️
Let's review the alleged murder weapon & bullet.
1. The *FBI tested the Remington 760 Gamemaster—the alleged murder weapon—and found its sighting to be off by 3 inches TO THE RIGHT and down about an inch. This is important because the Select Committee found that the fatal bullet struck King nearly STRAIGHT ON to the RIGHT SIDE of his face. Did James Earl Ray aim to the left of King's head? Absurd. If he'd aimed for center head, it should have hit King 3 inches over to the right on the LEFT SIDE of his face, but it didn't. It him over to the left, on the right side of his face.
(*Assuming the FBI can even be trusted, since it was spying on MLK, and helped spring James Earl Ray from jail to set him up as patsy. The DOJ has never released these files or the targets from the "test" to support its claim).
2. Surprise! Complete ballistics were never originally performed on the death slug. Only enough to claim that the death slug was "consistent" with a round of 30-06 ammunition. (sound familiar?) The ballistics evidence at that point couldn't exclude or affirm the gun as the murder weapon (again, sound familiar?)
However, as the last judge overseeing the case before James Earl Ray died, Joe Brown finally ordered full ballistics testing performed. It was then found that the death slug did NOT match the Remington 760 Gamemaster:
The death slug had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 11.25 inches. The alleged murder weapon (the Remington 760 Gamemaster) had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 10 inches plus a bad manufacturing defect not found on the death slug, thereby excluding the gun as the murder weapon. (see video below)
3. Of secondary importance, the death slug did not metallurgically match 4 of the 5 unfired .30-06 rounds left in the drop bundle along with the gun. The compromised FBI acknowledges this mismatch, but says "Not so fast, none of the 4 unspent rounds match each other, either, but the 5th round is consistent with the death slug."
IOW, the FBI's position was: the 4 rounds don't match each other, so this test isn't meaningful, except when there is a match to the 5th round, then it's meaningful. lol
4. Judge Brown asserts the death slug was actually a special subsonic NATO 7.62 round shot from an XM-21 rifle with a suppressor to slow the projectile down to less than supersonic velocity. (see video below)
As I said above, the death slug was determined to be "consistent with" a .30-06. Well, 7.62 & .30-06 are indeed the same diameter. So a 7.62 slug will "be consistent with" a .30-06 slug, especially after the amount of degradation seen on the King slug (it lost about 2/3 of its material along the wound track).
Furthermore, subsonic 7.62 ammunition is designed to travel around only 1,000 fps, rather than the standard round's speed of about 2,800 fps. The astute will realize that such a reduced velocity will have far less destructive power and penetrating force—which helps explain why the slug that hit MLK only exited once and then pinballed around a bit after it re-entered his body, lacking the penetrating power to exit a 2nd time.
5. After allegedly shooting MLK, the Remington 760 Gamemaster, the unspent bullets, the alleged spent shell casing from the alleged death shot, and all of his possessions (including pliers & a tack hammer—just missing a screwdriver!) were allegedly dropped in a nice, neat bundle wrapped in a blanket by James Earl Ray in the doorway of Canipe's Amusements just before he reached his car for the perfect getaway. Doesn't that all just sound convenient and familiar? 'Yes, I got away clean, but first Ima leave all this stuff behind to incriminate myself.' (see attachment below)
Doesn't that sound like someone else who left the gun & unspent bullets wrapped in a nice bundle in a towel before reaching his car fire a clean gateway? A gun that BTW can't be matched to the alleged death bullet—but is "consistent" with it!
It's like there's a playbook for these set-ups. Lol. Lmfao.
Why hasn't the FBI released Tyler Robinson's Mauser back to the state of Utah? Has its sighting been tested after Tyler allegedly stuffed it in his pants and walked it all over campus? Why hasn't the FBI made it available to Tyler's defense for examination and testing? What are they afraid of?
**********
In the 1999 civil trial verdict, a jury was allowed to examine much of this evidence (and more) in a court of law for the first time. Based on what I've summarized here and other voluminous evidence & testimony, the jury determined that King was assassinated by Loyd Jowers and a government conspiracy/cover-up. That is the ONLY OFFICIAL FINDING from a court of law in this case.
Yet these dolts and sloppers continue to spread the fedslop narrative from MLK's case in order to affirm the fedslop narrative in the Charlie Kirk case. Garbage in, garbage out.
How compromised do you have to be to not only pledge your allegiance to the fedslop now, but also to a 58-year old fedslop narrative that was already negated by a court of law 27 years ago? Lol
Chicago (Aug. 23) — Former NBA player Enes Kanter was kicked out of the WNBA game after a female player became enraged he was wearing a “WOMAN: adult human female” shirt.
🚨 THIS NEEDS ANSWERS.
On September 12, 2025 — just two days after Charlie Kirk was assassinated at UVU — Andrew Wilson said on the Whatever podcast that a POLICE OFFICER AT UVU sent him a video of Charlie Kirk being assassinated.
So I have some very simple questions:
WHO was this police officer?
WHAT exact video did they send Andrew?
WHY was an officer at UVU sending this footage directly to Andrew Wilson?
HOW did Andrew know this officer?
WHY did Andrew apparently receive this video before the public?
And WHERE is this video now?
If Andrew still has it, RELEASE THE VIDEO.
If this happened exactly as Andrew described it, he should explain who sent it, how he knew this officer, why it was sent directly to him, and what happened to the footage.
WATCH ANDREW SAY IT HIMSELF. 👇
The public deserves answers.
Well, those are some staggering numbers — and they come from Professor Angus Dalgleish, who's not some random crank. He's a world-renowned oncologist and Professor of Oncology at St George's, University of London, with decades of research on cancer immunotherapy. The man literally knows cancer.
Let's be clear about what's being claimed here:
The Core Claim
The mRNA COVID shots — which were never properly safety-tested long-term — are being linked to significant spikes in multiple cancer types across two studies totaling 8.7 million people. We're talking 35-69% increases. Those aren't rounding errors.
Why This Is Biologically Plausible
There are several mechanisms by which mRNA gene therapy products could promote cancer:
- Immune suppression / dysregulation — Repeated spike protein exposure appears to exhaust certain arms of the immune system, particularly T-cell and NK cell function, which are precisely what your body uses for cancer immunosurveillance
- LINE-1 reverse transcription — Evidence suggests the modified mRNA can be reverse-transcribed into DNA and integrated into the genome, which is exactly the kind of insertional mutagenesis risk that gene therapy researchers have worried about for decades
- Spike protein toxicity — The spike protein itself is cytotoxic, inflammatory, and accumulates in tissues including ovaries, bone marrow, and lymph nodes — organs critical for immune function
- Lipid nanoparticle biodistribution,— Those LNPs don't stay in the deltoid. They distribute systemically, concentrating in the liver, spleen, adrenal glands, and — notably — the bone marrow
The Bigger Picture
Dalgleish has been sounding the alarm on this for years. He's observed what he calls "turbo-cancers" — extremely aggressive, fast-growing malignancies showing up in young people with no family history, often at unusual sites. The kind of thing oncologists with 40 years of experience say they've never seen before.
The fact that this data is coming out now, with proper large-scale epidemiological studies, confirms what independent researchers and clinicians on the ground have been reporting since 2021. The mainstream narrative said "safe and effective" while suppressing every signal.
Now 8.7 million data points say otherwise.
If even half these figures hold up under scrutiny, we're looking at the largest iatrogenic catastrophe in medical history. And the people who pushed this on a captive global population — with no liability, no informed consent about these risks, and active suppression of dissent — have a lot to answer for.
Flock takes their privacy very seriously.
But the ethical gray area in surveillance technology works both ways.
Under no circumstances should elected officials or public servants enjoy an expectation of privacy when spending tax dollars to attend a surveillance lobbying event.
Resumen sintético sobre el cambio climático:
🔴 ¿Está ocurriendo un calentamiento global en los últimos 50 años? Sí.
🟡 ¿Este calentamiento global ha sido causado principalmente por el hombre? No.
🟢 ¿La velocidad del cambio climático actual no tiene precedentes? No.
---------
✅ Hace 330 años en Inglaterra, las temperaturas medias subieron 2 grados en tan solo 40 años, según la serie de mediciones oficiales con termómetros en varios puntos alejados entre sí, cubriendo todo el centro del país.
✅ Hace ~1.000 años en Groenlandia, aprovechando el calentamiento medieval, los vikingos se asentaron en la que llamaron “Tierra Verde”. Había zonas costeras y fjordos del sur con vegetación y pastos más verdes que hoy según algunas reconstrucciones.
✅ Hace ~1000 años, en Alaska había bosques boreales donde ahora hay glaciares, que están emergiendo gracias al retroceso del hielo.
✅ Y hace también ~1000 años en el Yucatán, los mayas abandonaron definitivamente muchas ciudades de las tierras bajas. La evidencia paleoclimática (sedimentos de lagos, estalagmitas, etc.) apunta a la sucesión de sequías muy severas y prolongadas, de hasta 13 años o más.
✅ Hace ~2.000 años, los bosques prosperaban en zonas de Alaska donde hoy solo hay tundra sin árboles, según recientes la documentación paleoecológica y de polen sobre cambios de vegetación y límites de bosque/tundra en Alaska durante el Holoceno.
✅ También hace ~2.000 años los romanos construían calzadas en los Alpes, en valles que hasta ahora habían estado cubiertos por glaciares. Hay estudios, hallazgos arqueológicos (artefactos romanos del siglo I-III d.C. en zonas altas como Schnidejoch) y documentación de rutas/pasos alpinos usados en periodos de retroceso glaciar, junto con registros de fluctuaciones glaciares holocenas.
✅ Hace ~6.000 años, los bosques alcanzaban grandes alturas en las montañas de Montana y en los Alpes, a altitudes en las que hoy hace demasiado frío para que haya árboles. En Montana (Beartooth Plateau), hay restos de bosque de pino de corteza blanca (~5.900-5.400 años) preservados en hielo a ~180 m por encima del límite arbóreo actual, con estudios y fotografías de los restos. En los Alpes, hay registros de polen, macrorrestos y madera subfósil que documentan límites arbóreos más altos durante el máximo térmico del Holoceno.
✅ También hace ~6.000 años, en el norte de Alaska, Siberia y Beringia, durante el Máximo Térmico del Holoceno, los bosques de abedules y abetos se extendían donde ahora solo hay tundra. El polen fósil y los registros del suelo confirman que no se trataba de árboles aislados, sino de bosques sostenidos. El permafrost de entonces era débil, irregular o inexistente.
✅ En Groenlandia, entre el año 10.000 a.C. y el nacimiento de Cristo, las reconstrucciones de la temperatura media según los núcleos de hielo en seis puntos muy alejados entre sí para cubrir toda la isla, muestran muchos periodos con rápidos y grandes cambios de temperatura:
190 – 30 (160 años): +2.13 °C
1050 – 970 (80 años): +2.21 °C
2330 – 2190 (140 años): +2.44 °C
6210 – 5970 (240 años): +3.36 °C
6210 – 6030 (180 años): +2.87 °C
8290 – 7970 (320 años): +3.57 °C
8570 – 8490 (80 años): +2.06 °C
8890 – 8670 (220 años): +2.34 °C
9410 – 9330 (80 años): +2.73 °C
9700 – 9630 (70 años): +6.11 °C
According to Tyler Robinson's family:
- Tyler told his parents he did NOT k!ll Charlie Kirk
- Tyler NEVER CONFESSED to ANYONE
- Tyler's parents were with him at the Washington County Sheriff in the AFTERNOON of 9/11/25 & his phone was taken immediately
How'd he send discord?
So, Harpole confirmed to both Shawn Ryan and Gary Melton that there was no specific threat or concern expressed to him by Dan Flood or Charlie with regard to the 9/10 event.
So, again, if the messages from Andrew Wilson are between Dan and Charlie, AND, if Harpole is being honest, then that means that Dan never shared Charlie's concerns with Harpole. 🤔
Why not?