David Eades

“Do any human beings ever realize life while they live it -- every, every minute?”

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@MrmuddT @FarsePoetica @katrosenfield @neerajadeshp I don’t care how I seem to you. You are absolutely nothing to me, and your opinion of me could not matter less. I have a great life, which is why I don’t feel a need to troll the internet looking for strangers to insult. Hope you find a life worth living someday.

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@FarsePoetica @katrosenfield @neerajadeshp I’m exactly where Kat is. There’s a whole lot wrong with the right, and I loathe Trump, but 2019 - 2021 was truly around the bend.

Plus civil rights erosion has there been?

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@iowahawkblog I really think college football is over. It’s on a glide path to be just minor league pro football.

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@bmoreabsurd @charlescwcooke @AlDefinitely That’s what my article says and that’s exactly what I’ve said here. Spewing case names and partially quoting Section 2 doesn’t change that.

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@bmoreabsurd @charlescwcooke @AlDefinitely I can’t resist one more attempt to help you. Yes proof of legislative intent isn’t required. But then proof of at least a racist electorate is. Otherwise, you default to proportional representation, which can’t be the test. I just can’t make it simpler for you than that.

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@bmoreabsurd @charlescwcooke @AlDefinitely I harmonized the whole thing coherently. You can’.t. I will take the extreme lameness of your “intellectually dishonest” claim as a full capitulation.Thanks.

BTW, you might google my article to see how it’s been cited by courts..They didn’t think it “dishonest”at all.

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@bmoreabsurd @charlescwcooke @AlDefinitely Your crabbed reading of Section 2 makes the first and second parts of it irreconcilable. My reading harmonizes them, which what courts are supposed to do.

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@bmoreabsurd @charlescwcooke @AlDefinitely Also, straight from the part of the Act that you keep pointing to is this language: “The extent to which members of a protected class have been elected to office in the State or political subdivision is one circumstance which may be considered.” Cf. Tim Scott.

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@bmoreabsurd @charlescwcooke @AlDefinitely P.S. I’m done. I know what I wrote. Have at it.

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@bmoreabsurd @charlescwcooke @AlDefinitely It’s not 1965 anymore.

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@bmoreabsurd @charlescwcooke @AlDefinitely Maybe your obtuseness is real.

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@bmoreabsurd @charlescwcooke @AlDefinitely

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@bmoreabsurd @charlescwcooke @AlDefinitely There has to be proof of actual racism, not just racially disproportionate results. Go ahead and have the last word in this forum. I’ll stand on what I wrote 40 years ago and the jurisprudence that has cited it.

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@bmoreabsurd @charlescwcooke @AlDefinitely Nope:

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@MayesMick9455 @afrotrad @401Casey https://t.co/OnYVejFg8P

[David Eades @DavidLEades]

@MayesMick9455 @afrotrad @401Casey Charlotte is growing faster than either of those two cities, actually