David Sal

“truth doesn’t care about your feelings”

[David Sal @DavidSal810555]

@dennisowens41 @JRubinBlogger @marceelias Disturbing 😳

[Dennis @bulldawg_menace]

@JRubinBlogger @marceelias So pissed off she wants to kill your pets…

[David Sal @DavidSal810555]

@JRubinBlogger @marceelias What a horrible person you are. Why did Pnut deserve to die. Democrats like you are the reason people will elect Trump. Shame on you

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Vote in person in Bucks County!

Only 5 hours left.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

California needs comprehensive reform

[Billboard Chris 🌎 @BillboardChris]

Democracy dies when media lies.

Well done to @hughhewitt for dropping the truth and leaving mid-show.

“We are news people, even though we have opinions, and we have to report the whole story if we bring up part of the story.

“I’m done. This is the most unfair election ad I have ever been a part of.”

[David Sal @DavidSal810555]

@elonmusk You can just go through the border and come back in with special perks handed to you

[Robert F. Kennedy Jr @RobertKennedyJr]

If you want to avoid nuclear war, I strongly urge you to vote for Donald Trump. In fact, I would go so far as to say that a vote for Kamala Harris is a vote for nuclear war.

[David Sal @DavidSal810555]

@keepgoing432 This is no Milton. I’ve seen this a few months ago

[Elle Lookbook @EvaLovesDesign]

At work I’m drowning in a deep 🔵 sea.
Everyone I talked to today about Trump & saving America had zero clue about what I was saying. We’re living in two different worlds. I’m in the 𝕏 world of truth, they’re in the misinformation land of The View, even the intellectuals believe the lies.

[David Sal @DavidSal810555]

@zmcke @WalshFreedom @Yonatan_Touval What is genocide

[David Sal @DavidSal810555]

@WalshFreedom Trump is real. Harris is fake

[David Sal @DavidSal810555]

@solbrokken @jasondebolt Listen to Elon. He is smarter than you

[David Sal @DavidSal810555]

@rolandsmartin @jasondebolt Why

[Jon Voight @jonvoight]

Vote Trump 2024

[Andy Ngo @MrAndyNgo]

Los Angeles — Horrific video from Oct. 5 shows another 7-Eleven being violently looted by a "flash mob." The lone staffer at this location tried desperately to shut the doors before he was threatened with a concrete slab by one of the masked rioters.

Once inside, the mob attacked the clerk and looted the store. Over a dozen 7-Eleven stores have been targeted by "flash mob" robberies across Los Angeles in recent months.

[@amuse @amuse]

ENDORSEMENT: Why is it, one must ask, that the collective outrage machine revs to full throttle upon hearing that @elonmusk has dared to endorse Donald Trump, while the same critical tongues remain curiously silent when the New York Times predictably throws its weight behind Kamala Harris or, indeed, any other Democratic candidate? At the heart of this disparity lies a fundamental misunderstanding of the players involved.

Let us first consider 𝕏, the platform formerly known as Twitter, and its role in this electoral drama. 𝕏 is precisely that—a platform. It does not opine, it does not advocate; it simply facilitates the free exchange of ideas, opinions, and, yes, even endorsements. Elon Musk, for all his eccentricities and immense influence, is but a single user of this vast public square. His endorsement of Donald Trump is no more the official position of 𝕏 than your local tavern’s musings on politics reflect the views of the walls that contain it. Musk, as a private citizen and the steward of this platform, is endorsing the candidate he believes will best safeguard the principles of free speech—the very lifeblood of 𝕏.

Contrast this with the august New York Times—a journalistic entity that styles itself as the arbiter of truth, yet publishes only that which aligns with its firmly entrenched worldview. Unlike 𝕏, the New York Times does not merely provide a platform for all viewpoints. Rather, it curates, filters, and advances a specific ideological framework, one that has increasingly found its home on the leftward side of the political spectrum. When the Times endorses a candidate, it is not merely engaging in free expression but actively guiding its readership toward a prescribed political outcome, using the authority of its editorial voice to do so.

The inconsistency of the response, then, reveals a deeper anxiety within the establishment. Musk, by endorsing Trump, is seen as a threat not simply because of the endorsement itself, but because he dares to challenge the media gatekeepers who have long assumed the mantle of dictating public discourse. His belief in a candidate who will safeguard 𝕏's ability to remain an open forum for speech threatens the very control that institutions like the New York Times have wielded for so long.

At the end of the day, what we are witnessing is not merely a debate over political endorsements but a contest between two visions of public discourse—one that prizes the free exchange of ideas, and another that seeks to define the limits of permissible opinion. And it is for this reason, I suspect, that Musk’s endorsement sparks such ire, while the New York Times’ partisan advocacy passes by with nary a raised eyebrow.

---

Fun Fact: The New York Times has a long history of endorsing presidential candidates almost always supporting Democrats:

2024: Kamala Harris (Democrat)
2020: Joe Biden (Democrat)
2016: Hillary Clinton (Democrat)
2012: Barack Obama (Democrat)
2008: Barack Obama (Democrat)
2004: John Kerry (Democrat)
2000: Al Gore (Democrat)
1996: Bill Clinton (Democrat)
1992: Bill Clinton (Democrat)
1988: Michael Dukakis (Democrat)
1984: Walter Mondale (Democrat)

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

If Kamala wins, our 235-year experiment in constitutional government may well end

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

If @realDonaldTrump doesn’t win, the “Democratic” Party will legalize so many illegals that there will be no swing states!

America will become a single-party socialist state, just like what happened to California, where they just made requiring voter ID illegal.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Those against freedom of speech are the bad guys!