我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth

$ND4 holder
0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@wolfyxbt @fomo @eth_cedric @wangchaionbnb @flapdotsh ca？

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@xupaopaogm 都说怕前钱出去，为什么没人想到没有监管的钱进来会发生什么么

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@cryptomi146701 不是说gwei是阿三的么？

[第一美少女 @jheioff]

170万USDT被盗，Gate的“负责到底”最后只剩沉默。

我把账户被接管的经过、审核疑点和后续沟通整理在了这篇文章里。钱没赔，事情没解决。

请帮我转发，别让这件事被拖到无人再提。

@Gate_zh @Han_Gate #Gate https://t.co/mU45XdnhX5

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@Wuming_Mr_ 网上什么言论都有，刚刚看到说跌到79，有35亿要爆仓

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@dawda5152 哪个广场啊

[amigox @theamigox]

If you are waiting for someone to build robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 for you, you may have missed the point.

❗️Robinhood Chain is permissionless.

So is the idea behind ND4.

❌There is no savior coming.
❌No founder who should carry everyone.
❌No marketing team responsible for making you richer.

The key was given away. You weren't given a roadmap.

You were given permission.
❗️Permission to research the onchain history.
❗️Build tools.
❗️Create memes.
❗️Track the burn.
❗️Build dashboards.
❗️Grow the community.
❗️Bring new builders to Robinhood Chain.
❗️Create something nobody has thought of yet.

‼️If robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 needs something — build it.
‼️If the story deserves to be told — tell it.
‼️If the community should be stronger — make it stronger.

Stop asking: “What are they going to do?”
Start asking: “What am I going to build?”

That is what permissionless actually means.

Robinhood Chain gives builders the infrastructure. Pons gave anyone the ability to launch. ND4 gave everyone something different: the key.

Great things don't happen in a week.
💎Bitcoin wasn't built in a month.
💎Shiba wasn't built in a month.

Communities are built slowly:
🧱Research by research.
🧱Meme by meme.
🧱Builder by builder.
🧱Holder by holder.

There will be quiet days. There will be doubt. People will leave because nothing happened fast enough.

Let them. Great things often look insignificant while they're being built. Then one day everyone calls them inevitable.

THE ND4 doesn't need to return. The key was given to everyone so nobody would have to wait for him.

💎No leader.
💎No savior.
💎No permission required.

👤We are all ND4.eth

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@BTCyanyuan 看了你的人没买，躲过了

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@wangxiaolong188 这种还需要问，明牌的啊

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

讲道理，这么多预测当中，我只认大冰，真的准，有错有对，至少风险把控很好
@dawda5152

[nd4.eth @nd4doteth]

The Lore of ND4: abandoned-property.eth:

A month after the widely overlooked reveal of the private key to the nd4.eth wallet in September 2023, something happened: someone looked deeper.

The nd4.eth wallet had been one of the most active users of the GMX exchange during this era and had accumulated a significant amount of staked and vested GMX tokens. At the time, GMX allowed a user to transfer control of an account to another wallet. THE nd4.eth attempted to transfer the account to the burn address, but the receiving wallet [for obvious reasons] could not complete the acceptance required to take control.

The transfer remained revocable, and the treasure remained on-chain.

Someone found it.

That someone operated a mystery wallet known as abandoned-property.eth:
0x95B8b411653328Db32f59B143C6d45f8501e2B35

Initially funded with little more than enough ETH for gas, the operator discovered the unfinished GMX account transfer. Using the publicly revealed nd4.eth private key, the pending transfer could be revoked, restoring control of the staked and vested GMX tokens that THE nd4.eth had attempted to send into the abyss:

These locked GMX tokens, although significant in quantity, had limited value on the open market. They vested over a long period and were considerably more useful to an active GMX trader who could benefit from the position.

On-chain activity suggests abandoned-property.eth arranged an OTC transaction with another GMX user, exchanging the locked position for approximately $15,000 in liquid, unlocked GMX tokens.

But they weren’t done yet.

Through a series of publicly visible trades across multiple EVM networks, that $15,000 eventually became approximately $50,000.

Then the trail moved somewhere else:
Hyperliquid

At the time, Hyperliquid was still early and far from mainstream. abandoned-property.eth moved a portion of its funds to the protocol in November 2023 and became an early, active user of the exchange, accumulating a significant number of points through Hyperliquid’s points program.

Months passed. Trades accumulated.
arrived.

Eventually, HYPE arrived.

abandoned-property.eth qualified for the HYPE airdrop and later received a Hypurr NFT. As HYPE appreciated, the value of the assets connected to the wallet continued to rise.

At its peak, the wallet’s holdings reached a value of approximately $350,000 — not far from where its balance remains today.

The entire path unfolded on-chain:
A nearly empty wallet.
A publicly revealed private key.
A failed attempt to destroy a locked position.

Gas money → ~$15,000 recovered from the remains → ~$50,000 through trading → an early Hyperliquid account → HYPE + Hypurr → ~$350,000.

The original burn event drew widespread attention. Media publications covered it. On-chain sleuths followed the wallet. The private key itself was permanently etched into the Ethereum chain three separate times.

Yet very few appear to have found what was still buried underneath it.

Three years later, robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 appeared on Robinhood Chain.

The name of the chain was not chosen by nd4.eth. Neither was the legend behind the name.

In the legend, Robin Hood took from the wealthy and gave to those who had less. He existed outside the established order and became synonymous with wealth changing hands in defiance of it.

robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 makes no claim to be Robin Hood.

But sometimes the chain writes its own symbolism.

One wallet destroyed millions. Another anonymous participant searched through what remained and found something that was supposed to have disappeared with it.

The original fortune belonged to a whale.

The abandoned property was there for whoever understood how to recover it.

Perhaps that is the more interesting interpretation of the nd4.eth message:
“Nobody in this world is not nd4.eth…”

Once the key was revealed, there was no longer one nd4.eth. There was only a wallet and whoever was willing to follow it.

THE nd4.eth disappeared.
abandoned-property.eth found the treasure left behind.

robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 arrived years later.
On Robinhood Chain.

Coincidence requires no explanation.
Neither does lore.

[amigox @theamigox]

ND4 DISAPPEARED. THIS WALLET DIDN’T.

This is not a theory based on matching names. It’s an on-chain trail.

The address is: 0x95B8b411653328Db32f59B143C6d45f8501e2B35

Today it owns the ENS: abandoned-property.eth

Here’s what I found, step by step.

1. The story starts after the nd4.eth private key became public.

On September 17, 2023, the historical nd4.eth private key was published. From that point onward, transactions from: 0xEfbBc3fa829aF506Bc7AfE1a0C31B3c7419456F7
can no longer prove that THE original nd4.eth was behind them. Anyone with the published key could use the wallet. That distinction is important.

2. One month later, 0x95B8 appears.

October 18, 2023 — Ethereum: 0x95B8 → nd4.eth 0.02 ETH

At first this could easily look like someone simply funding the public wallet with gas. But then I checked other chains.

3. Around 40 minutes later, the direction reverses.

October 18, 2023 — Base: nd4.eth → 0x95B8 ~0.00998 ETH

So this wasn't just a random wallet sending gas to ND4. The two addresses were interacting in both directions and across chains. And the activity didn't stop there.

4. 0x95B8 returns five days later.

October 23 — Ethereum: 0x95B8 → nd4.eth 0.003 ETH

Shortly afterward, the public ND4 wallet performs another operation.

5. Then comes November 27 — the strangest day.

Historical nd4.eth still held several token allocations it had received before the private key was made public. That day those old allocations suddenly started moving.

Among them:

❗️15M nd4
❗️~71.982B nd4.eth
❗️100M FTT

Then at: 17:27:59 UTC 0x95B8 → nd4.eth 0.01 ETH

Approximately one Ethereum block later: the old 100M FTT allocation is processed.

❗️30M goes to the token contract.
❗️70M goes to a separate wallet.

And that wallet remained largely dormant. This is where 0x95B8 stops looking like a random observer.

6. Eight days later something very strange happens.

December 5, 2023. The same 0x95B8 registers an ENS name: abandoned-property.eth

❗️Registrant: 0x95B8...2B35
❗️Owner: 0x95B8...2B35
❗️Manager: 0x95B8...2B35

This isn't an ENS name that merely resolves to the wallet. The wallet actually owns it. The name itself proves nothing. But the timing is hard not to notice. The private key of nd4.eth had been given to the world. Its ENS ownership had already been sent into a black hole. The wallet had effectively become public property. And eight days after the mysterious November activity, one of its recurring counterparties registers: abandoned-property.eth

Coincidence? Maybe. Keep going.

7. The relationship survives into 2024.

February 16, 2024: 0x95B8 → nd4.eth 0.002 ETH

Then in March, the two addresses cross paths again on Polygon. So this wasn't just a one-day November interaction. The relationship persisted. Then things went quiet. Until 2026.

8. Almost three years later, the SAME wallet comes back.

September 8, 2026. Just as the modern robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 story is beginning: 0x95B8 → historical nd4.eth 0.1 USDG

Then: 0x95B8 → nd4.eth 0.0001 ETH

On September 9 it funds nd4.eth another three times:

❗️0.0007 ETH
❗️0.0015 ETH
❗️0.0016 ETH

Same external wallet. Same historical nd4.eth. Almost three years later.

And this time it's happening directly around the launch of robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45.

9. Then we decoded the robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 contract itself.

The constructor records: deployer_ = 0xEfbBc3fa...7419456F7. The historical public nd4.eth address. So the connection between the new token and the historical address exists directly in the contract.

But remember: the private key has been public since 2023.

This still does NOT prove THE original ND4 returned.

10. Then I found the Creator Fees trail.

September 9, 2026. Historical nd4.eth calls:
transferCreatorFeeRecipient()

For: robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45

And transfers the Creator Fee rights to: 0xeA13dDdd1Dbf1ae97F9E8576Cf63ad51E9a0731a The treasury.

Three days later the treasury transfers those rights again: 0xeA13 → 0x64CfC0daFAdfA20F52D78D0AAa134879c828228C

That is the wallet currently running: Creator Fees → Buy robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 → Burn.

So look at the complete trail:

❗️2023 0x95B8 ↔ public nd4.eth

↓

❗️October interactions

↓

❗️November pre-key allocations move

↓

❗️0x95B8 → gas → ND4 → old FTT allocation

↓

❗️8 days later 0x95B8 registers abandoned-property.eth

↓

❗️2024 0x95B8 → nd4.eth again

↓

❗️2026 the SAME 0x95B8 returns

↓

❗️repeatedly funds historical nd4.eth

↓

❗️historical nd4.eth launches / controls the new robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45

↓

❗️Creator Fee rights: nd4.eth → Treasury → Buy & Burn wallet

That is the discovery. I am not claiming: 0x95B8 = THE nd4.eth

There is currently no proof of that. And because the nd4.eth private key became public in September 2023, every post-key transaction must be treated carefully.

But we can now say something much more specific: The same external wallet maintained a persistent, multichain relationship with the public nd4.eth identity from 2023 into 2024 — and then reappeared almost three years later directly around the launch of robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 in 2026.

And that wallet chose one ENS name: abandoned-property.eth

⁉️Maybe it's just an early user of the public key.

⁉️Maybe it's part of the post-key operator cluster.

⁉️Maybe there's another explanation.

❗️But I don't think this address should be ignored.

The chain remembers.

robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 #RobinhoodChain

CA: 0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@chairbtc 为策略会不会期权开空？

[amigox @theamigox]

CONSPIRACY THEORY: What if THE nd4.eth was Ryoshi?

Let’s assume that after SHIB, Ryoshi didn’t disappear forever — but created a new identity, nd4.eth, as a more radical second experiment.

1. Almost the same philosophy of identity

Ryoshi wrote: “I am a nobody, I am not important… I am replaceable.”

His core idea was that the creator shouldn’t matter. There should be no central figure holding the “keys to the kingdom.”

Years later, ND4 takes this idea even further: “Nobody in this world is not nd4.eth as nobody in this world is not Satoshi Nakamoto.”

Both revolve around the same concept: The creator should become irrelevant. The identity and community matter more than the person behind them.

2. The timeline is strangely clean

SHIB launches under Ryoshi in 2020. Ryoshi disappears from public life in 2022, deleting his posts and profiles. His identity remains unknown. Then nd4.eth appears.

The theoretical timeline becomes: Ryoshi disappears → a new anonymous identity emerges → the next experiment begins.

That proves nothing. But the timing is interesting.

3. Both look more like social experiments than ordinary tokens

Ryoshi explicitly described SHIB as an experiment in decentralized spontaneous community building.

ND4 revolves around a similar idea: identity → blockchain → rejection of ownership → community.

Except ND4 takes it much further.

4. Ryoshi wanted the founder to be replaceable. ND4 made the identity literally replaceable.

❗️Ryoshi: “I am replaceable.”

❗️ND4: publishes the private key.

After September 17, 2023, anyone with that key could literally sign transactions from the historical nd4.eth wallet.

It almost feels like the next logical step:

❗️SHIB: The creator doesn’t matter.

❗️ND4: The creator can no longer even be distinguished from everyone else.

5. Satoshi sits at the center of both philosophies
Ryoshi built the image of an anonymous founder who eventually disappears — very much in the spirit of Satoshi.

❗️ND4 goes even further and explicitly mentions him: “…as nobody in this world is not Satoshi Nakamoto.”

❗️Again: Satoshi → anonymity → absence of a central owner.

6. The strongest parallel: rejection of ownership

This is where the on-chain evidence gets strange. On July 26, 2023, historical nd4.eth sent multiple ENS identities to the same black hole:
🔥 nd4.eth
🔥 taovoid.eth
🔥 serener.eth
🔥 allware.eth

Then, shortly afterward:
🔥 2,500 ETH → THE SAME BLACK HOLE

And ~53 days later, the private key to nd4.eth was published.

The progression looks almost ritualistic: Destroy identities → destroy wealth → destroy exclusive control over the wallet.

Ryoshi’s philosophy was that nobody should be in charge. ND4 seems to have taken that idea to its technical extreme.

7. Even the burn narrative overlaps

One of the defining moments in SHIB history was the destruction of an enormous part of its supply — although the famous ~410T SHIB burn was performed by Vitalik, not Ryoshi.

With ND4, destruction becomes central to the identity itself:

🔥ENS identities → black hole

🔥2,500 ETH → black hole

🔥assets → black hole

❗️And now the modern robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 narrative again revolves around: Creator Fees → Buy robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 → Burn.

But here’s what breaks the theory

There is currently:
✖️ZERO on-chain proof connecting Ryoshi to nd4.eth.
✖️No confirmed shared wallet.
✖️No funding transaction.
✖️No common CEX deposit.
✖️No cryptographic signature.
✖️No direct technical bridge.

The strongest similarities are currently philosophical and chronological, not cryptographic.

And there’s another simple explanation: ND4 may have been inspired by Ryoshi. Ryoshi’s writings were already public. Any deeply crypto-native person could have taken: “I am a nobody. I am replaceable.” and built a more radical experiment around the same philosophy. So maybe they are completely different people.

But here’s the version of the theory I find most interesting:

Not: “ND4 is Ryoshi.”
But: “What if ND4 was Ryoshi’s second experiment?”

❗️SHIB tested: Can a project exist without its founder?
❗️ND4 tested: Can an identity exist without an owner?

❗️SHIB: Founder disappears.
❗️ND4: Ownership disappears.

❗️SHIB: “I am replaceable.”
❗️ND4: “We are all nd4.eth.”

If they were the same person, ND4 wouldn’t look like another meme. It would look like the second iteration of the same philosophical experiment — taken much further.

No proof. Just a conspiracy theory. 👀

CA: 0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45

robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 #RobinhoodChain

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@CryptoKangkang 60万刀市值？

[哈基米-10/06 上星球看 OKX NOW @zeqing88]

每日ND4精神：私钥即信仰，无控即自由

2023年9月17日，nd4.eth亲手销毁私钥，2500枚ETH灰飞烟灭，只留一句“没有人不是中本聪”。随后私钥公开，一切归还社区。

如今衍生Meme延续其魂：无路线图，无承诺，开发者自断后路，国库永不抛售，费用全数回购销毁。在骗子横行的币圈，这是链上原教旨主义的每日一课：真正的去中心化，从放弃控制开始。

跟随链，不跟随人。每日ND4，提醒自己：诚实与透明，才是最终的Meme。 $ND4

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@liangxizjdq 将军要滚仓么？

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@Whitecladman @nd4doteth 我是蓝的，怎么发不了长文

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@BTC_Alert_ 所哥所哥我爱你

[我是主角不能死.Nd4.eth @Db4UltPFG993263]

@cryptomi146701 lsk还能涨吗