Over the past year, I've been passionately working on addressing one of the biggest challenges facing open source: long-term sustainability.
Both Web2 and Web3 continue to struggle with this issue. While Web3 offers unique advantages through access to capital, decentralized governance, and programmable funding mechanisms, it often lacks the institutional and operational structures needed to effectively support maintainers, security, community collaboration, emerging technologies like AI, and the actual costs of sustaining open source projects.
Building on a pilot program in the Cardano ecosystem, along with lessons learned from other open source communities and industry initiatives, I've been developing a comprehensive approach that connects governance, operational maintenance, and economic sustainability into a cohesive model.
This research is structured around three interconnected frameworks:
The Who — Decentralized Open Source Program Office (dOSPO): How traditional Open Source Program Offices can evolve to coordinate governance, accountability, and open source stewardship within decentralized ecosystems.
The What — Open Maintenance Framework (OMF): How to structure programs that address the real needs of open source projects, including maintainer support, contributor development, security, community collaboration, and infrastructure resilience, rather than simply throwing money at the problem.
The How — Open Replenishment Framework (ORF): How to connect the economic value created by open source infrastructure back to the systems responsible for maintaining it, creating opportunities for recurring funding and long-term financial sustainability.
I encourage everyone to explore the first two whitepapers, covering the Who and the What, which are already available. The final piece of the puzzle, the How, is undergoing its final round of review and edits and will be published soon.
I've also been working with the @lfdecentralized to help establish a neutral home for this research through its Labs initiative, making these frameworks freely accessible for ecosystems to explore, adopt, test, and improve.
Ultimately, the goal is to move beyond asking how we fund open source today and start building the systems that can sustain it tomorrow. I believe this challenge will only become more important as our collective dependence on open source, decentralized infrastructure, and AI continues to grow.
Whitepapers and Frontiers Lab can be found here:
https://t.co/qKdjepCcFv
How does post-quantum cryptography fit into Cardano’s roadmap for 2030 and beyond?
Join us on Wednesday November 4th for a TSC discussion with Input Output Research (IOR) researchers.
All welcome - please share in your networks!
https://t.co/HTqhtNTMZm
My SEC comment letter explains how https://t.co/6XIqMdC4r4 can help regulators evaluate blockchain networks like Cardano, using independently verifiable evidence. https://t.co/iav3u102aw
JUST IN: 100,000 farm lands in India are now registered on the Cardano blockchain.
This marks a milestone for https://t.co/QKQl4Cqs8X’s agricultural trust layer, bringing farm data on-chain to support more verifiable, reusable records across the ecosystem.
I guess I'm pretentious to some, annoying to others, hated by a few; but to those who really know me, or those that I worked with or worked for, and or to those that have followed my outputs:
Then You know I do this work with passion, and I genuinely don't try to elevate myself above my station, I sought out true masters of their craft and learned from them and was privileged to do so.
I really care for this ecosystem, being Cardano, I left a cushy role to be in the weeds with the many and carve things from the ground up then be stuck in an ivory tower. I accomplished my goal at Intersect, IOG, and Voltaire, gave over something the community should run and left a foot in the door in the TSC to help propel things forward. I do consult and do work for free for on a few Cardano projects as they can attest to and hopefully they find it valuable, they're success is our success. And now I'm hoping to help with the commercial side.
And yes, I joined Filecoin to support the missing pillar in many ecosystems and to attack the most centralized part of the world outside of banking, being data storage. This is where web3 will first be proven outside privacy domains and banking. So I am proud to be on this mission and advance it.
I also am doing my best to support Midnight as time allows as well, but that has it's own force going on now and doesn't need much assistance.
But I hope none of the entities here or leadership or community find me atrocious, just speaking out what I believe is needed and imploring for change or action as best as I can, I'm just a frog on a Lilypad floating in a big pond. Do know nothing I say has malice, just passion behind it 😅
I'm sorry if you are not using Claude, Grok, Chat, Gemini, and one OS AI Model co-currently and use them to quality check each other then.....
Your outputs must be basic.....
@angerman@Malix_Labs Not to mention their legal team that will sue any copyright infringement or hint of it , They've sued the US gov't multiple times..................
In fact I just received a cease and desist for writing the message
.@chainlink is proud to partner with @hedera, @Aptos, @AvaLabs, and @StellarOrg in urging the SEC to codify its digital commodity framework.
Builders need lasting certainty. Codifying this progress would be a meaningful step toward keeping America the home of digital asset innovation.
H/t @jackson_mueller for leading this effort 🫡
The baptism of Jesus isn't simply the Father pouring His power onto the Son. Scripture describes three distinct persons acting simultaneously: Jesus standing in the water, the Holy Spirit descending upon Him like a dove, and the Father speaking from heaven.
If the Spirit is merely an extension of the Father's power, how do we explain Scripture describing Him as one who teaches, convicts, intercedes, speaks, guides, and can even be grieved (John 14:26; 16:13; Romans 8:26; Ephesians 4:30)? These are personal actions, not merely the workings of an impersonal force.
Regarding John 10:30 and 14:9, I agree these passages demonstrate the unity between the Father and Son and how perfectly Christ reveals the Father.
But we can't ignore the broader context. When Jesus declared, "I and the Father are one," His opponents understood Him to be making a claim to deity and accused Him of blasphemy (John 10:33).
Throughout Scripture, Jesus forgives sins, receives worship, claims divine authority, and identifies Himself in ways associated with Yahweh (John 8:58; 20:28; Colossians 2:9).
Yet He also prays to the Father, is sent by the Father, and promises to send the Spirit. Scripture presents both divine unity and personal distinction. The Trinity is an attempt to faithfully account for both without denying either.
The same applies to Genesis. God's use of "us" suggests plurality, though I wouldn't argue that Genesis 1:26 alone establishes the entire doctrine of the Trinity. Its meaning must be considered alongside the rest of Scripture. Israel's confession that "the LORD is one" (Deuteronomy 6:4) remains foundational.
Yet the New Testament reveals Christ as the one through whom all things were created (John 1:1–3; Colossians 1:16), while also identifying the Spirit as personally active in God's work. We also see Father, Son, and Spirit distinguished together in Christ's baptism (Matthew 3:16–17), the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19), and the apostolic benediction (2 Corinthians 13:14).
A framework that recognizes only the Father and Son as persons while reducing the Spirit to impersonal power struggles to account for these passages collectively.
As for the hypostatic union, it isn't some doctrine invented to escape difficult biblical passages. It's a theological description of what Scripture already teaches. John tells us that the Word was God and became flesh (John 1:1, 14).
Paul tells us that Christ existed in the form of God yet took the form of a servant (Philippians 2:6–8), and that the fullness of deity dwells in Him bodily (Colossians 2:9). Scripture presents Christ as genuinely divine—preexistent, Creator, and worthy of worship—while also genuinely human, having been born, tempted, having suffered, and having died.
The doctrine of two natures in one person preserves both truths without diminishing His divinity, denying His humanity, or dividing Him into two persons.
Ultimately, the question isn't whether the word "Trinity" appears in Scripture. It's whether the doctrine accurately accounts for everything Scripture reveals about God.
We have one God, not three gods. Yet Scripture identifies the Father as God, the Son as God, and the Spirit as acting personally and divinely, while consistently distinguishing them from one another. Their distinction is more than a loving relationship between a father and son, and their unity is more than agreement in purpose.
Any alternative explanation has to account for all of that without dismissing or redefining the passages that challenge it. Simply describing the Father and Son as a divine family and the Spirit as their shared power doesn't adequately explain the full biblical witness.
The Trinity doesn't attempt to add something to Scripture. It seeks to reconcile what Scripture already reveals: one divine being, three distinct persons, without confusing the persons or dividing the nature of God.
Been in the space for a bit and it’s good to see ecosystems mature and taking GTM, viable product solution building, and incentive structures serious, latest one of note below 👇
Read the full story here:
https://t.co/upS0rOBrBu
The Filecoin network's latest upgrade is complete! Now, a growing share of rewards will go to services that bring paying customers onto the network, and that share grows as paid demand grows.
@TheExBeliever Yet the are over 8 Billion people on the planet and more food in US store shelves to feed the world over, how can He be to blame when we’ve betrayed each other for greed?