I dont waste time reading opindia pamphlet etc, so wondered if they are covering NEET, CBSE paper evaluation, homruz killing etc b/c if they dont, u must stop reading them just for stories of H women trying to set a narrative after their rships went wrong with M guys..
Men basically have to choose between being sexually arousing to women or being liked by women.
One of these is a much more enjoyable experience than the other trust me.
There is, as anyone who’s spent time in the industry knows, a strong inverse correlation between how “cookie cutter” you dress and how important you are.
For the first time in history, women are no longer marrying men for financial security or material things, just on the basis of their character and the men are failing miserably.
Looking at the 360 biriyani issue closely and feeling worried for singles, especially women. Makes you wonder if maybe traditional marriage apps are better to find matches, but then the Twisha Sharma case crops up in your head and reminds you even that route isn’t necessarily safer. No wonder more and more urban women are choosing to work more, spend on themselves and focus on their own lives instead of constantly looking out for men…..
There is no "Gender war." Men have been abusive to women for generations, and this generation of women is finally refusing to tolerate it anymore. That's all.
This right here hits the nail on the head.
Dating in India as a woman is an endless exercise in navigating male entitlement. The moment you step out, patriarchy assigns a transaction to your presence.
Men genuinely believe that buying a coffee, paying for dinner, or simply existing in the same space as them somehow gives them a deed of ownership over a woman's body and consent.
Our boundaries are not commodities open for negotiation or purchase.
When you reduce a woman's consent to a transaction, it isn't "just a joke," it is a reflection of a deeply sick culture that cannot comprehend female autonomy unless it has a price tag attached to it.
The sheer number of men rushing to defend this as "humor" proves exactly why feminist rage is not just justified, but absolutely necessary.
If you need a woman to be a commodity to find a punchline, the problem isn't the joke. The problem is your internalized misogyny.
Read my post. The point was not that every person in the room was a man. The point was that EVERY MAN IN THAT ROOM participated in what was happening.
Yes, there are women who enable misogyny. It isn't the groundbreaking revelation you like to make it seem like. Pointing to the couple of women in the audience doesn't absolve men of their doing, nor does it change the fact that misogyny is overwhelmingly driven and normalised by men.
mind you, they had no problems watching chopped uncles playing college students and romancing actresses half their ages but this is where they draw the line