Bitcoiner with philosophy background. No meaningful fiat credentials. Critiquing arguments--sometimes tweet about it, usually about Bitcoin. Learning in public.
The entire value prop of ordinals/inscriptions is a lie.
Ordinals are fiat; inscriptions are infinite, and are not inscribed upon an ordinal sat.
Anyone who says otherwise is either a bad actor, or has an incomplete understanding. Read more:
https://t.co/B5w2Wjoo8l
@ActuallyClimber Really interesting analysis, thank you. The narrative for MSTR for me just started to "feel wrong" for me last summer, but I could never really say why.
Blue-pickers having averted disaster by a modest majority, they subsequently round up and summarily execute the ~40% of the population that picked red.
@waitbutwhy Red button people should be publicly mock hanged and broadcast on TV. Then everyone reinforces altruism and over time people become good people.
That is in fact how our species evolved altruism.
We are social primates🦍, not lizards 🦎
Blue is the Human answer
@Gagege@douglaswils@ShawnMathis1972 No there is in fact ambiguity in the English word “responsible.” It can imply guilt/causation. “The drunk driver was responsible for 3 deaths.” It can also imply command or stewardship. A reasonable reading of Doug’s passage could conclude he’s saying men fail to lead.
@Gagege@douglaswils@ShawnMathis1972 Responsible in the sense that he fixed the problem, not responsible in the sense that he mismanaged his house and failed to lead properly. Hence why I pointed out the ambiguity in my first comment.
@Gagege@douglaswils@ShawnMathis1972 It says “the man is completely responsible for all the problems.” But somehow it insinuates something other than what it says?
@douglaswils@ShawnMathis1972 With respect Doug I think you’re equivocating on the ambiguity of the phrase “take responsibility” here. Jesus isn’t responsible for our sins in the way the quoted passage appears to insinuate a man is responsible for what goes on in his house.