Deepyate ದೀಪ್ಯತೇ

ಯುಗಪುರುಷ ಮೋದಿ ಅವರ ಪರಿವಾರದ ಸದಸ್ಯ YUGPURUSH MODI JI PARIVAAR KA SADASYA

[ಅಲ್ಪಸಂಖ್ಯಾತ @alpasankhyata]

ಚಿನ್ನಯ್ಯ ಪ್ರಕಾಶ್ ರಾಜ್ ಜೊತೆ ಮಾತಾಡಿದ್ದು ಜುಲೈ 14, 2025

ಪ್ರಕಾಶ್ ರಾಜ್ ಮೊಹಾಂತಿ ಅವರ ಜೊತೆ ಇದರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಮಾತಾಡಿದ್ದು ಜುಲೈ 15, 2025

ಆದರೆ, ಮೊಹಾಂತಿ ಅವರು ಈ ಕೇಸ್ ನ SIT ಮುಖ್ಯಸ್ಥರಾಗಿದ್ದು ಜುಲೈ 17 ಕ್ಕೆ 😂 😊

ಇದೇ ಕಾರಣಕ್ಕೆ ದಿನಾಂಕದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಕೇಳ್ದಾಗ ಪ್ರಕಾಶ್ ರಾಜ್ ಸಿಟ್ಟಾಗಿದ್ದು, ತಬ್ಬಿಬ್ಬಾಗಿದ್ದು.

[Amita Sachdeva, Advocate @SachdevaAmita]

Writ Petition to be Filed Tomorrow Before Hon'ble Delhi High Court Seeking Action Against Derogatory Content

With the blessings of Bhagwan Shri Ram and Bhagwan Shri Krishna, we will file tomorrow a Writ Petition before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court seeking removal of Dhruv Rathee’s highly derogatory video titled “Can Hindus Eat BEEF? | Kerala Story 2 EXPOSED”, which insults Bhagwan Shri Ram, Bhagwan Shri Krishna, Sita Mata and our sacred scriptures.

Despite more than 2.5 months having passed, the Grievance Appellate Committee has still not decided our Appeal No. 8321/2026. The video continues to remain public.

Along with this, we have also initiated criminal remedy and the Ld. CJM, Saket Courts has already called for Action Taken Report from the concerned SHO on our complaint against Dhruv Rathee.

After exhausting all remedies under IT Rules, we are approaching the High Court. The petition will be listed after the court vacations.

We seek immediate removal of this communally sensitive content.

Justice delayed cannot be justice denied.Heartfelt thanks to Sr. Adv. Makarand D. Adkar (@AdkarMakarand), Adv. Vikram Kumar, Adv. Yadavendra Saxena, Adv. Shantanu Adkar, Adv. Kartikeya Durrani, Adv. Mayank Dwivedi, Adv. Mohit Singh, Adv. Amandeep, Adv. Kartik Mehla

Jai Shri Ram
Jai Shri Krishna
Jai Hind

[Aishwarya Ananthkumar @Aishwarya_A_K]

. @PriyankKharge avare you hold the Home portfolio. You are the custodian of law & order. So a simple question: under which law are you raising these demands?

Name the law that compels a voluntary association to register. There isn’t one being unregistered is completely lawful in India, not an offence by any stretch of imagination.

As a custodian of law and order you should cite the law. So: which provision,exactly ?

Going forward best to get legal advice before you issue more such letters. An earnest suggestion.

[Republic Kannada @KannadaRepublic]

Chakravarthy Sulibele About Prakash Raj: ವೀರೇಂದ್ರ ಹೆಗ್ಗಡೆ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಗೌರವ ಇದೆ ಎಂದ ಪ್ರಕಾಶ್​​ ರಾಜ್​​ಗೆ ಸೂಲಿಬೆಲೆ ಚಾಟಿ​​

WATCH #RepublicKannada LIVE: https://t.co/la4w3D9DzZ

#chakravarthisulibele #karnataka #vasanthgiliyar #PrakashRaj #prakashrainews #vikasputtur #Dharmasthalacase #Dharmasthalacontroversy #PrakashRaj #republickannada

[Deepyate ದೀಪ್ಯತೇ @Deepyate]

@simplelady_ash ಎಚ್ಚರ ಇದ್ದೀವೋ ಇಲ್ವೋ ಅಂತ ಚೆಕ್ ಮಾಡಿಕೊಳ್ಳೋಕೆ

[Asianet Suvarna News @AsianetNewsSN]

RSS Registration row: ಆರ್‌ಎಸ್‌ಎಸ್‌ ನೋಂದಣಿ ಕಡ್ಡಾಯ ಅಲ್ಲ; ಕುಟುಂಬ ರಾಜಕಾರಣದ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಯಿಂದ ಸಂಘಕ್ಕೆ ಪ್ರಮಾಣ ಪತ್ರ ಬೇಕಿಲ್ಲ - ಸುಪ್ರೀಂ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ ಹಿರಿಯ ವಕೀಲ ಮಹೇಶ್ ಜೇಠ್ಮಲಾನಿ ಅಂಕಣ
Link Click here:
https://t.co/npWXVrHpYA
#RSS #Priyankkharge #MaheshJethmalani #karnatakapolitics

[Shakunthala Nataraj @ShakunthalaHS]

ಕೊಂಚ ಕಾನೂನು ಕೂಡ ತಿಳಿಯದ, ಇತ್ತ ಸಂವಿಧಾನವೂ ಅರ್ಥವಾಗದ ರಾಜ್ಯದ ಗೃಹ ಸಚಿವರಿಗೆ ನ್ಯಾಯವಾದಿಗಳೇ ಬುದ್ಧಿ ಹೇಳಬೇಕಿದೆ...🙏

[Prashant Kaknale @KaknalePrashant]

RSS ನೊಂದಣಿ ಮಾಡಿಸದ್ದು ಕಂಡವರಿಗೆ ,

ಲಕ್ಷಾಂತರ ಬಾಂಗ್ಲಾ ದೇಶಿಯರು ರಾಜ್ಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಅಕ್ರಮ ನೋಂದಣಿ ಮಾಡಿಸಿಕೊಂಡದ್ದು ಇನ್ನೂ ಕಾಣಿಸಿಲ್ಲ....

Mr PUC Fail Pinku

[Madhukara R Maiya 🇮🇳 @madhumaiya]

ಹಿರಿಯ ನ್ಯಾಯವಾದಿ (ಮತ್ತು ಬಿಜೆಪಿ ಸಂಸದ) ಮಹೇಶ್ ಜೇಠ್ಮಲಾನಿ ಅವರು ಕರ್ನಾಟಕದ ಸಚಿವ *ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್ ಖರ್ಗೆ ಅವರಿಗೆ ನೀಡಿದ ಪ್ರತ್ಯುತ್ತರದ ಪ್ರಮುಖ ಕಾನೂನಾತ್ಮಕ ಅಂಶಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ವಾದಗಳ ವಿವರ ಇಲ್ಲಿದೆ:

ರಾಷ್ಟ್ರೀಯ ಸ್ವಯಂಸೇವಕ ಸಂಘದ (ಆರ್‌ಎಸ್ಎಸ್) ಕಾನೂನಾತ್ಮಕ ನೋಂದಣಿ, ಆರ್ಥಿಕ ವ್ಯವಹಾರಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ತೆರಿಗೆ ವಿನಾಯಿತಿಗಳ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಪ್ರಶ್ನಿಸಿ ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್ ಖರ್ಗೆ ಅವರು ಆರ್‌ಎಸ್ಎಸ್ ಮುಖ್ಯಸ್ಥ ಮೋಹನ್ ಭಾಗವತ್ ಅವರಿಗೆ ಬಹಿರಂಗ ಪತ್ರ ಬರೆದಿದ್ದರು. ಅದಕ್ಕೆ ಮಹೇಶ್ ಜೇಠ್ಮಲಾನಿ ಅವರು ಕಾನೂನು ಚೌಕಟ್ಟಿನಡಿ ನೀಡಿದ ಸವಿಸ್ತಾರವಾದ ಉತ್ತರದ ಪ್ರಮುಖ ಮುಖ್ಯಾಂಶಗಳು ಈ ಕೆಳಗಿನಂತಿವೆ:

೧. ಆರ್‌ಎಸ್ಎಸ್‌ನ ಕಾನೂನಾತ್ಮಕ ಸ್ಥಾನಮಾನ (Legal Status)

ಖರ್ಗೆ ಅವರ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆ:

ಶತಮಾನದಷ್ಟು ಹಳೆಯದಾದ ಇಂತಹ ಬೃಹತ್ ಸಂಸ್ಥೆಯು ಯಾವುದೇ ಸೊಸೈಟಿ ಅಥವಾ ಟ್ರಸ್ಟ್ ಕಾಯ್ದೆಯಡಿ ಅಧಿಕೃತವಾಗಿ ಏಕೆ ನೋಂದಣಿಯಾಗಿಲ್ಲ?

ಜೇಠ್ಮಲಾನಿ ಅವರ ಉತ್ತರ:

ಭಾರತೀಯ ಸಂವಿಧಾನದ ವಿಧಿ 19(1)(c)ರ ಅಡಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ದೇಶದ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಬ್ಬ ನಾಗರಿಕನಿಗೂ ಯಾವುದೇ ಸಂಘ ಅಥವಾ ಸಂಸ್ಥೆಯನ್ನು ಮುಕ್ತವಾಗಿ ಸ್ಥಾಪಿಸುವ ಮೂಲಭೂತ ಹಕ್ಕಿದೆ ಎಂಬುದನ್ನು ಜೇಠ್ಮಲಾನಿ ನೆನಪಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಸೊಸೈಟಿ ನೋಂದಣಿ ಕಾಯ್ದೆ (1860) ಅಥವಾ ಯಾವುದೇ ರಾಜ್ಯದ ಪಬ್ಲಿಕ್ ಟ್ರಸ್ಟ್ ಕಾಯ್ದೆಯಡಿ ನೋಂದಣಿ ಮಾಡಿಸುವುದು ಸ್ವಯಂಪ್ರೇರಿತವೇ ಹೊರತು ಕಡ್ಡಾಯವಲ್ಲ. ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯ ಅಥವಾ ಕಾನೂನಿನ ಮೂಲಕ ನಿಷೇಧಕ್ಕೊಳಗಾಗದ ಹೊರತು, ನೋಂದಣಿ ಇಲ್ಲದೆಯೂ ಯಾವುದೇ ಸಂಘಟನೆಯು ದೇಶದಲ್ಲಿ ಕಾರ್ಯನಿರ್ವಹಿಸುವುದು ಸಂಪೂರ್ಣವಾಗಿ ಕಾನೂನುಬದ್ಧವಾಗಿದೆ.

೨. ಆರ್ಥಿಕ ಪಾರದರ್ಶಕತೆ ಮತ್ತು 'ಗುರುದಕ್ಷಿಣೆ' ಕುರಿತ ಕಾನೂನು

ಖರ್ಗೆ ಅವರ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆ:

ಆರ್‌ಎಸ್ಎಸ್‌ಗೆ ಬರುವ ಭಾರಿ ಪ್ರಮಾಣದ ಹಣದ ಮೂಲ ಯಾವುದು? ಅದರ ಆಸ್ತಿಪಾಸ್ತಿಗಳ ನಿರ್ವಹಣೆ ಹೇಗೆ ನಡೆಯುತ್ತದೆ ಮತ್ತು ಅದರ ಆಡಿಟ್ ವರದಿಗಳು ಎಲ್ಲಿವೆ?

ಜೇಠ್ಮಲಾನಿ ಅವರ ಉತ್ತರ:

ಸಂಘಟನೆಯ ಮುಖ್ಯ ಆದಾಯದ ಮೂಲವಾದ 'ಗುರುದಕ್ಷಿಣೆ' (ಸ್ವಯಂಸೇವಕರು ನೀಡುವ ಮುಕ್ತ ನಿಧಿ) ಕುರಿತು ಈ ಹಿಂದೆಯೇ ಭಾರತದ ಸರ್ವೋಚ್ಚ ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯಗಳು ನೀಡಿರುವ ತೀರ್ಪುಗಳನ್ನು ಜೇಠ್ಮಲಾನಿ ಉಲ್ಲೇಖಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಗುರುದಕ್ಷಿಣೆಯು ವೈಯಕ್ತಿಕ ಗೌರವ ಮತ್ತು ಶ್ರದ್ಧೆಯಿಂದ ನೀಡುವ ಸ್ವಯಂಪ್ರೇರಿತ ದೇಣಿಗೆಯಾಗಿದ್ದು, ಇದು ವಾಣಿಜ್ಯ ಅಥವಾ ಕಾರ್ಪೊರೇಟ್ ತೆರಿಗೆ ವ್ಯಾಪ್ತಿಗೆ ಬರುವುದಿಲ್ಲ. ಹಾಗಾಗಿ, ಖರ್ಗೆ ಅವರು ಕೇಳಿರುವ ಮಾದರಿಯ ಸಾರ್ವಜನಿಕ ಘೋಷಣೆಗಳ ಅಗತ್ಯ ಇದಕ್ಕೆ ಇರುವುದಿಲ್ಲ ಎಂದು ಸ್ಪಷ್ಟಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ.

೩. ಸಚಿವರ ಅಧಿಕಾರದ ವ್ಯಾಪ್ತಿ

ಜೇಠ್ಮಲಾನಿ ಅವರ ವಾದ:

ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್ ಖರ್ಗೆ ಅವರ ಬಹಿರಂಗ ಪತ್ರದ ಧಾಟಿಯನ್ನು ಟೀಕಿಸಿರುವ ಜೇಠ್ಮಲಾನಿ, ಇದು ಕೇವಲ ರಾಜಕೀಯ ಪ್ರೇರಿತ ಹೇಳಿಕೆಯೇ ಹೊರತು ಅಧಿಕೃತ ಆಡಳಿತಾತ್ಮಕ ವಿಚಾರಣೆಯಲ್ಲ ಎಂದಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಖರ್ಗೆ ಅವರು ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ಸಚಿವರಾಗಿದ್ದರೂ, ಸಂವಿಧಾನವು ನೀಡಿರುವ ಮೂಲಭೂತ ಹಕ್ಕುಗಳನ್ನು ಮೀರಲು ಅಥವಾ ಖಾಸಗಿ ಸಂಘಟನೆಯೊಂದರ ಮೇಲೆ ಕಾನೂನುಬಾಹಿರವಾಗಿ ನೋಂದಣಿ ನಿಯಮಗಳನ್ನು ಹೇರಲು ಅವರಿಗೆ ಅಧಿಕಾರವಿಲ್ಲ ಎಂದು ಪತ್ರದಲ್ಲಿ ಉತ್ತರಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ.

[Shakunthala Nataraj @ShakunthalaHS]

ಅಲ್ಲಿ ಅಪ್ಪ, ಇಲ್ಲಿ ಮಗ ಇಬ್ಬರೂ ಸೇರಿ ಕಾಂಗ್ರೇಸ್ ಎಂಬ ಪುರಾತನ ಪಿತೃಪಕ್ಷಕ್ಕೆ ತಿಥಿ ಮಾಡಿಯೇ ಹೋಗೋದು..!🙄

[Ganesh @me_ganesh14]

Public TV journalist Arun Badiger takes on Priyank Kharge over his letter to Mohan Bhagwat with a series of points

1) Rahul Gandhi carries the Constitution everywhere. Then under which provision of the Constitution is registration mandatory for an organisation? He adds that registration is required only when Orgg wants to take Govt Benefits or Public donations.

2) Responding to MB Patil's support for Kharge, he asks how many Dalit organisations and pro-Kannada organisations are registered and whether the same standard is being applied to all.

3) He adds that RSS functions through multiple affiliated organisations which are duly registered and that those entities follow the rule of land perfectly

4) He asks how writing a public letter demanding answers from RSS becomes a legal process. If there is a legal issue, why not approach the court and get the registration issue settled, also in letter no where it has been mentioned that which article of the constitution?

5) Talking about Unregistered Organization there are a lot in Bengaluru and Karnataka which takes donation from Public and misuses it for personal use. So Home Minister who has power can declare only Orgg with legal right can work

6) In case of registered Organization only those above 18+ can become members but in RSS anybody from any age can join and RSS only gives the teaching of Patriotism and Dharma so minister should say what is wrong in it?

My take on Kannada media 👇

Unlike Malayalam or Tamil media the Kannada media have full ethics they won't blindly follow agenda set up by Congress. Priyank Kharge will be questioned for pulling this Political stunt without any reason and Congres plan of witch hunt on RSS won't go unchecked.

[𝗚𝘂𝗿𝘂🇮🇳 (мσ∂ιʝι кα Y̺o̺d̺h̺a̺) @Gururaj1972]

ತನ್ನ ಸ್ವಕ್ಷೇತ್ರಕ್ಕೆ ಹೋಗಲು ಎಸ್ಕಾರ್ಟ್ ಬೇಕಾಗಿರೋ ಬಾಯಿ ಬಡುಕ ಕಪ್ಪೆರಾಯನಿಗೆ
ಹಿಗ್ಗಾಮುಗ್ಗ ಜಾಡಿಸಿದ ದಾವಣಗೆರೆ ಅಜಯಕುಮಾರ್...... 💥💥💥

ನರ ಸತ್ತ ನಾಮರ್ದ... 🤡🤡🤡
ಬಾಯಿ ಬಡಾಯಿ ಮುಕುಳಿ ಲಡಾಯಿ...🤡

[News Arena India @NewsArenaIndia]

6 BJP MPs give privilege notice against Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge for making 'disrespectful' remarks against PM.

[Kiran Aradhya @KiranAradhyaadv]

Puneeth Kerehalli and other activists exposed illegal muslims from Banglades stealing Kannadiga jobs, tax money, and benefits using fake documents.

Instead of acting on it, the Congress government is after RSS registration 🤷‍♂️

Knock Knock Lashkar-e-olata's 🤮

[SanghiDentico🇮🇳,🚩🚩🕉️ @priyathedentico]

Karnataka and Telangana two potential states for BJP sarkar . People are fed up with congress rule!!

[Kiran Aradhya @KiranAradhyaadv]

"Why demand accountability only from Shri Ram? Why not from Allah? Why not from Jesus?"

Kannada journalists are on fire🔥

[Deepyate ದೀಪ್ಯತೇ @Deepyate]

@JethmalaniM @PriyankKharge Sir
Can we file Defamation Case on daily ranting misleading claims by CON gress team?

[Mahesh Jethmalani @JethmalaniM]

.@PriyankKharge’s letter addressed to RSS Chief Shri Mohan Bhagwat Ji is not an exercise in constitutional inquiry.

It is a calculated political provocation: thin on law, thick on presumption, and conspicuously marked by the entitlement of dynastic politics.

For a full century, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has served the nation openly, in the full glare of public scrutiny: building character, fostering discipline, strengthening social cohesion, and doing so without seeking state patronage.

Certain Congress leaders, by contrast, have preferred suspect diplomacy - flying to China to sign an MoU with the Chinese Communist Party, shrouded in secrecy and political discomfort.

The contrast could not be starker.

One has operated in Indian sunlight for a hundred years.

The other has repeatedly found comfort in foreign shadows.

Let us address Priyank Kharge’s demands with the precision they lack.

Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution guarantees every citizen the fundamental right to form associations, unions or co-operative societies. This is not a privilege granted by the State. It is a constitutional freedom.

Article 19(4) permits reasonable restrictions on this freedom only on specified constitutional grounds, and only by authority of law.

Nowhere does the Constitution mandate that every voluntary association must first obtain registration from the State before it can exist or function.

The RSS is precisely such a voluntary association of citizens, united by a shared ideological, cultural and national vision.

It requires no certificate of existence from a minister.

It requires no political permission slip from a dynast.

It requires no registration merely because a Congress leader wishes to manufacture a controversy.

Priyank Kharge’s demand that the RSS must “register” or justify its legal existence is not rooted in constitutional text, statutory obligation or settled principle. It is a whimsical assertion unsupported by law.

In a constitutional democracy governed by the Rule of Law, no individual, however exalted his office, may issue dictates and expect compliance merely because he occupies public office.

Priyank Kharge may be a Minister in the Government of Karnataka. That office confers upon him only those executive powers that law recognises. It does not confer upon him the authority to summon any citizen or organisation and demand that it restructure itself according to his personal fancies.

Such demands, unmoored from any legal mandate, are non est in law.

A dynast indulged by inheritance does not become larger than the Constitution merely because he sits in a ministerial chair.

It was perhaps in anticipation of precisely this species of overreach by those clothed with temporary authority that Thomas Fuller observed: “Be you ever so high, the law is above you.”

Those words were later immortalised by Lord Denning in The Due Process of Law.

The point applies squarely here.

Further, Mr. Kharge’s insistence on disclosure of funding, expenditure, assets and taxation conveniently ignores settled judicial pronouncements.

The question of taxability of Gurudakshina - the voluntary offerings received by the RSS from its members - has already been examined by a constitutional court.

In Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the Patna High Court upheld the principle of mutuality and held that Gurudakshina received from members is not taxable.

The RSS has never claimed exemption from the law.

It has simply refused to be bullied into accepting obligations that the law itself does not impose.

For a hundred years, it has functioned openly, published its activities, withstood bans, political hostility and repeated attempts by Congress governments to delegitimise it.

It has done so without taxpayer money. Or foreign funding.

The letter addressed by Junior Kharge in the garb of accountability stems from legal misconception and political malice.

It is unworthy of the constitutional office he holds and of the democratic traditions he claims to defend.

The RSS needs no certificate of good conduct from any dynast, however high his office.

The law remains above all of us.

Kharge junior’s pompous demands lie beneath it.

[ಭೀಮಾ ತೀರದಲ್ಲಿ..🏹 @bharatvarsha03]

🚨 BREAKING NEWS

Criminal complaint filed in Tirupati court against actor Prakash Raj for allegedly derogatory remarks on Lord Rama.

Prakash Raj had claimed that Lord Rama and Lakshmana travelled south to "occupy" South India.

Case registered today.

[ANI @ANI]

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge writing to RSS over its registration, BJP MLA Mihir Kotecha says, "Priyank Kharge is a fool. Whenever this country has faced a disaster, the RSS has always been the first to respond, going to the scene and serving our people. Commenting on the RSS shows Priyank Kharge's foolishness."