BSV Browser is live.
iOS: https://t.co/TljuF17Irk
Android: https://t.co/fyh3eUUoIP
It's a regular web browser — tabs, bookmarks, search — with a self-custodial BRC-100 wallet baked in.
Source available:
https://t.co/NtFVJtUFDh
@EquityDiamonds@MissionGains@XMoney They’re rolling it out gradually. I have an invite but the link is 404 for some reason.
I would like to investigate and let you know.
“We” aren’t switching over. It’s just a new option. Also BRC-100 is an app to wallet interface. The general approach being discussed here is whether or not to run a global index to support address based payments.
I have been one of the proponents of moving away from address payments because the cost to facilitate them goes up with network wide throughput. Whereas the cost to do SPV remains both lower and static, independent from network growth as a whole.
Recently attended a workshop presented by Axel in Zürich. He showed his BSV Desktop mnemonic on screen for all to see.
Curiously, you can’t just steal funds from him despite having access to his root key here.
This is the tradeoff between BIP-32 (trad crypto) and BRC-42 (used here).
Without Axel’s laptop, the root key can’t be used to steal his existing funds.
Still though… time to rotate your keys Axel!
One of the coolest features of BRC100 is that, for most purposes, your wallet IS your applications database. Label transactions and tag outputs, and you don't need to build anything else.
Nice work! Would you consider writing a BRC specification?
There are a few attempts to handle 402 already here, but we merge any serious proposal without editorializing.
With auth
https://t.co/YVxzdTaQdF
Without
https://t.co/M20iiUWTE0
X402 official repo PR (open to help here)
https://t.co/AnvGBKK2MS
Pointed 1,000 live mainnet Traceport attestations at Arcade. Many orgs, many sectors, with no failures.
Straight to Teranodes. No ARC key, rate limits, or account. This is the Teranode architecture moving forward, and I’m genuinely excited. 🚀
TY @CrosTheRubicon & the Arcade devs
Right, my point was just that "mempool" is often considered as something which exists globally; but in reality each node has a set of what it considers valid transactions which they have in their block template. (subtrees these days)
That set can be different per miner. Whoever mines the block ultimately decides which txs are valid if there are any conflicts. So...
...there is no mempool. 🥄
@johncalhooon Depends on the source.
I created tx = optimistic
From 3rd party = wait for SEEN MULTIPLE
I have a PR in the works for SEEN MULTIPLE. I think it should be based on miners of last 100 blocks including it.