@BenAdamsO_O@JustinWolfers Assuming you are asking this honestly, I can only recommend reading up on tariffs from an educational perspective rather than an editorial or political perspective. At its most simple tariffs are a tax on the consumption of whatever from whereever, it's about the trade-off then.
@BenAdamsO_O@JustinWolfers The first point would be the benefits of trade, they are broad, the reach far, they are universally accepted. Tariffs always have a cost, always create inefficiency, but you can argue there might be a time and a place ie. protectionism around a vulnerable industry.
@DaleJohnsonBBC@Mike__Abram Not convinced by this as a blanket statement, 'the ball is there to be won' but you then have to win ball, no ball, kick man, surely about the most classic foul that exists
@GerryMcBride I'll tell you another unrelated one Gerry, if that is your real name, we need to start pronouncing lavatory like laboratory if we have any hope of saving society.
@brianmlucey It's a nicely summarised stat, but obviously some sort of composite of emissions per capita with some manner of weight given to what the emissions are generating. Without that it's just shouting into the void.
@GraceOnFootball I think you have it a bit backwards, inverted forwards is probably more of a tactical choice than a player preference. But I agree with your broad point that he absolutely isn't cut out to play on the left in the modern system.