@kellerjordan0 Currently achievable growth rate in computation might be a maximum; then this would be a minimum bound by your definition. Further, as soon as computation is greater than all human cognition, change (informational and material) happens faster than our perception forever hence.
@pmarca@bhorowitz Can we get right to try laws federally so drugs can be taken after safety is proven? (Phase 1)
Can we have Operation Warp-speed for aging?
Can we create Special Jurisdictions (similar to how SEZs transformed China) to try out new governance models and incorporate what works?
When I started writing long-reads on X, my idea was to a bunch of interesting people discussing interesting science together. Last week I ran a provocation explaining my position on strong rejuvenation in humans and got comments from @DrMorganLevine , @drmichaellevin, @DerekU02 , @NunzioCuzzucoli and many more. I summed up the conversation in the article below. Thank you very much and let’s think about the next intellectual provocation ahead!
@fedichev Good points. Maybe there is some combination of young plasma/mitochondria infusion that would keep the body from aging the new organs/tissues. At least they wouldn't suffer from as much entropic aging. You could even engineer them for antibody-mediated partial reprogramming.
@fedichev The ship of theseus argument could improve the case against your example. If you replace things piece by piece, it will be hard to argue the resulting human is a different individual than the one who started the therapies. Of course this happens naturally at the molecular level.
@KKajderowicz Yeah, you're right. I guess this works the best the more clone-like it is though. E.g. cloned cells seeded on a 3d printed lattice. Need young age of cell lines + no rejection by host + appropriate cell development/differentiation. I like Renewal bio, ImmuneAge, and Mitrix