Detvan SK

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@CachacaLimonada @_dunningkruger1 @nocontextmemes Humankind had some former Civilisation developers in team so they probably just used ideas that was talking about in Firaxis.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

Just trying to get from him what is this post trying to say.

Like really. Reacting at old post from december 2025 about bug that can be used when Mojang wanted to patch these things and his defence is that no one actually using it.

Shouldn't he rather focus then at examples what people actually using? Because defense 'no one doing this' isn't a reason to not patch it.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

Ok, what the heck was that picture for what he blocked me?

Like just because I have similiar opinion than someone else I have to coppied my point from somewhere else or what the fuck?!!!

2 people are not allowed to have similiar opinion at this platform even don't know about each other?

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

Do I have to explain the basics of game design to you now? There's a difference between when a player is killed in such a way that they don't even know what happened and when they see that the better player just overplayed them.

Attribute swapping is not an intuitive thing and it doesn't actually make sense that it's in the game because it's a bug, everything indicates to the player that you have to cheat because why does he have a delay on switching weapons and you don't?

Minecraft mini-games mostly don't have anything like a ranking system, experienced PVP players go against players who just play to relax, so even "don't play on PVP servers" is not an argument because every mini-game with combat is PVP.

And the main thing I meant with that comment (which you confirmed by writing it) is that you don't really need attribute swapping for PVP, you just got used to it because Mojang didn't patch it in 1.10. when it should have.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@Toboinetsu @_prophet_futu Funny that no one of you made such big deal from that when MS added direct storage into Windows since that was direct access of GPU into RAM.

30 years of no change ..... sure.

Also, it is not like we had not NPUs in CPUs like 3 years at this point.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@RABBI3D I don't know if in 1.2 it can be called bug since untill 1.9 there wasn't something like forced weapon delay.

Then in 1.9 they kinda forget to patch it in the code since point of combat update was delay between hits.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@KongsiKonn @the_shrimp_lord @Trad_West_Art It means you see only survivors pattern.

Even not sure if that fits to theme since there is lot of things in modern bread that was not in old one.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@Toboinetsu @_prophet_futu Yeah and same thing will be implemented into PCs ... and what? Still it is performance boost.

Like you trying to say that only difference between new laptop and laptop from 1996 (30 years ago) are different only in raw power?

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

M1 didn't changed whole industry. It was just really impresive CPU for power effectivity at battery mod.

Also graphs M1 had showen to be really wrong about power and Apple then started defending that it showing only watts vs power.

We are still using x86-64 as 6 years ago even predictions that it should be long death. Even laptops and handhelds still using same architecture.

Yeah companies trying for ARM but saying "changed whole industry" while in customer level is seen almost nothing changed, only change is that MacBooks last longer at battery.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@SebAaltonen @shiri_shh I agree with most but no way M5 Max will be stronger than than RTX Spark. That things is literally build to be developer tool at highest models.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@shiri_shh So Nvidia just did stronger version what Apple and Qualcomm did and more expensive.

What it realistically changed? Like if power jumps, better battery and less weight isn't change, then why this is?

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@Toboinetsu @_prophet_futu So Nvidia just did stronger version what Apple and Qualcomm did and more expensive.

What it realistically changed? Original post was about laptops didn't changed in 30 years. Like if power jumps, better battery and less weight isn't change, then why this is?

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@may_existed @0xAbhiii Because Claudie Mythos found 100s of bugs in almost every software we are using so lot of things now got big patches.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@PotatoCam69 Well kinda true that if it is spin-off should be called like that. But game is called as if it is sequel. So lot of people will not know that.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@Lampontheapp @Pirat_Nation I don't really thing that if there will be such a problem it is really her fault.

She wasn't project leader, and wasn't even at final phase of production.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@ShitpostRock2 /gamerule KeepInventory is fine.

Just give me anything that will actually kill me by other way than making me lost in the cave or something like that.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@ArtDonaled @Wolf_BergEis @VALC_6 Yeah but would if GOG would allow DRM?

Like No-DRM is reason why there are any users at GOG, and brining in DRM would some companies in, but also lost users in record time.

So original argument still stance that market just don't care about other stores exist enough.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@gabefollower Microsoft and Valve are in cahoots?

Isn't it MS who lowered cut at Xbox PC store at 12%?

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

@SucharSharma @Domuru_ @Garaa0fTheRage That is not mentioned at email that it is a reason.

[Detvan SK @DetvanS]

If Epic case would be illegal then Nintendo and Sony would have also stop all their contacts at support game studios with exclusive deals. Because technically there is no difference if without contract game would be made, then would be at Steam.

And yes, forcing someone else to price parity is illegal if courth will see Steam as essential store at market.