@moneyacademyKE The frustration comes from the double standard. Africans face strict visa checks, denials, and endless scrutiny, yet Kenya is expected to quickly accommodate sensitive U.S. operations without the same hesitation.
@LarryMadowo People are not “anti-help.” They’re questioning the logic: if America’s top priority is keeping Ebola away from its own citizens, why should Kenya be expected to normalize that risk?
@Kenyayearbook With all due respect, if the U.S. with one of the world’s most funded healthcare systems — says it “cannot and will not allow” Ebola cases into the country, Kenyans are justified in asking why Kenya’s far more limited health system should take that responsibility instead.
@HonAdenDuale Kenyans deserve clear answers. Why is Kenya being considered to host Ebola-exposed U.S. citizens.when Marco Rubio himself said: “We cannot and will not allow any cases of Ebola to enter the United States.” If it’s too risky for America, why should Kenyans not question it too?
@vinguard254 Marco Rubio literally said, “we cannot and will not allow any cases of Ebola to enter the United States.” But somehow Kenya should be comfortable hosting the quarantine center? If it’s too risky for America, Kenyans are allowed to ask questions too.
@salty_oysters @MigunaMiguna Kenya gained independence in 1963 and governs itself under international law like every recognized nation. Sovereignty isn’t up for debate because of foreign influence or aid.
@NancyCa07675857@MigunaMiguna No one is saying people will “walk freely.” The concern is the mindset that Africa should automatically become the solution whenever powerful countries want distance from a problem.