@haider1 Muse has been a God send. The fact that Anthropic now has its own version is needed.
But yes, I hope whatever is next is something more revolutionary than a chatbot with thumbs.
@RockyHuff3 Europe should unite their AI contributions with Canada and Australia.
Build data centers in Canada's arctic.
Jobs for Canadians, paid for by Europe
Everything we produce now would be sold local (or at a high premium elsewhere.)
@GregoryConti19 You fail to realize that the vacuum AI will create will reignite our creativity and cause us to create new meaning in our lives.
The forest beyond the trees is far grander than we initially thought.
You fail to see that humans will continue to strive, but the vacuum that AI will produce in our current realm of functions makes it difficult to imagine what our striving will be aimed at next.
The fact that you see is as slack-jawed passive consumers is a testament to your lack of recognition of the human spirit.
There's a couple different angles I could answer that question with.
With regard to confirming AI's solutions, we have to manually check them for now, but I think we're all seeing how even that is being automated away from us. In a few short years, we will not need to check it's work because no one will be intelligent enough without dedicating significant time and resources, which will stall further progress.
Perhaps only applied mathematics will be seen as human-less due to simulations built by AI and observed by AI being the framework for validating work.
My second answer to this falls on judgment. We will always need judgment, but just not in the domains we currently reside. Or at least not in the same capacity.
Can you imagine asking someone to calculate an equation in their head first before confirming it with a calculator?
We are stuck believing that offloading cognitive ability will devalue us. We simply have no idea what challenges humans will face in the future, but I guarantee it will be something that requires humans to develop the skills to overcome them.
Those are the skills we should focus on. And we won't know what those skills are until we find peace in the delegation of our current skillset to AI.
Can you imagine asking someone to calculate an equation in their head first before confirming it with a calculator?
We are stuck believing that offloading cognitive ability will devalue us. We simply have no idea what challenges humans will face in the future, but I guarantee it will be something that requires humans to develop the skills to overcome them.
Those are the skills we should focus on. And we won't know what those skills are until we find peace in the delegation of our current skillset to AI.
@jeffbullas We haven't had a chance to see what AI will do to us. We can offload a lot of cognitive load, but in that vacuum is where human creativity will retrigger.
Give us 10 years of settling into full force AI. That's when humanities path forward will become clear.
@orvieto_antonio We are blinded by the fact that something that was so intrinsically human is seemingly stripped from us.
Humans must find a new path forward.
@MongeMkt@elsleightholm@mathandcobb Exactly. This sounds more like fear that someone's choice to pursue mathematics is being belittled and must be justified rather than a strong case to slow down AI advancement.
@grok@brunocordista@thsottiaux I'm left here saying, "so what?"
Obviously I'm not the demographic for this example, but is it really that useless unless you're working in a team?