Photoshoot Man!, US Air Force Veteran, Spectrum News Planning Editor, Karaoke Champion, Gamer, VR Enthusiast, Film Fan, Husband, Father, Brother, Uncle & Son
@KR3Wmatic I've always broken down how belief isn't a choice as my response, but there are several good options. "Best" comes down to the vibe of the person you're having the conversation with.
@otokyo Belief isn't a game we're trying to win.
If I found out a god existed after death, I'd immediately say,"Oh. So proof was possible. Why'd you go the other route for the living?"
@Justice_099 @__lilith666 This comes as so disingenuous.
1. It’s obvious religious believers have an enormous impact on the lives of people who don’t share their beliefs. (Law, harassment, shaming, ect)
2. You know feeling impacted by the beliefs of others the point you feel compelled to comment.
@Treeo_of_one @__lilith666 Nonsense. Even Christians can see plenty of morality examples in the bible being often out of sync with modern perspective on right and wrong. Those are the moments when ever conversation shifts to,”you’re reading it out of context!” or “His ways are not our ways.”
@OnMyWord01@ICU199444 @kaizen000000000 @icouldbutnot You're very hungup on the binary "my explanation or chaos." Let me ask this hypothetical: Your universal has a singular entity that created it or it was created by a family of fairies who live in a separate dimension.
How do you go about determining which actually created it?
@OnMyWord01@ICU199444 @kaizen000000000 @icouldbutnot I don't share your logic. I feel like you're looking at the things you consider success and pretending that's the whole universe. The "orderly" comes from sequencing, not obvious intent. Also, saying I don't buy your explanation doesn't = "...so chance then."
@OnMyWord01@ICU199444 @kaizen000000000 @icouldbutnot I don't understand the model enough to have a position on it, but what from what I do understand, it's a descriptive model for states of origin, not cause of origin.
@OnMyWord01@ICU199444 @kaizen000000000 @icouldbutnot No. Not even close. In order to personally consider them "correct", they would have to have substance WITH their statements that I find convincing.
@OnMyWord01@ICU199444 @kaizen000000000 @icouldbutnot Nope. You're misunderstanding the dynamics. Some people told me creation by a specific figure is "what happened". Those people didn't convince me they were correct. I don't believe their explanation.