![Dialectism's tweet photo. May Allah punish you with a layer deeper than Firaun for your lies. you're a Jahil and a Fasiq, at worst a Kafir, but may Allah excuse you for your deficient brain. Now go takfir the Ulamah of the Shafiiyyah and Malikiyyah ya ibnul Sahir
1.
,,That is because the issue of labeling everything called sorcery as "disbelief" is extremely problematic according to our principles, for sorcerers rely on things that the rules of Sharia refuse to label as disbelief, such as the action of the stones mentioned before this issue. Likewise, they gather drugs and place them in rivers, wells, water jars, or graves of the dead, or in a door that opens to the East or other such places. They believe that the effects occur during those matters due to the properties of their souls, which God Almighty created to link between them and those effects when there is sincere resolve, as previously mentioned. Thus, we cannot declare them disbelievers for gathering drugs, nor for placing them in wells, nor for their belief that those effects occur through that action, because they have tried that and found it does not fail them due to the properties of their souls. Thus, that belief became like the belief of physicians that effects occur upon drinking drugs due to the properties of the natures of those drugs and the properties of the souls. It is not possible to declare them disbelievers for it, because it is not from their earning, nor is it disbelief without an earned act. As for their belief that the stars do that, it is by the power of God Almighty."
2.
,,I said: Regarding what he stated—that one cannot be accused of disbelief [i.e Takfir] for collecting medicines and other such actions—this is correct. This is if the collection and all such actions are not intended to bring about the required effects by themselves. However, if they were intended as such, then it is the kind of magic that is disbelief in itself, because it involves the belief that these things have influence [independent of God], or it is evidence of disbelief according to the Maliki [And Shaafi] school, and God knows best."
3.
,,As for his not being accused of disbelief for that—EVEN IF THEY BELIEVED THAT THE STARS AND DEVILS DO THAT BY THEIR OWN POWER AND NOT BY THE POWER OF GOD ALMIGHTY—some Shafi'i scholars said: This is the position of the Mu'tazilites regarding the independence of animals' actions by their own power without the power of God Almighty. Just as the Mu'tazilites are NOT accused of disbelief for that, these [people] and those who differentiate between them by saying that the stars are a subject of worship are not accused of disbelief. IF the belief in [independent] power and influence were disbelief, THEN the influence of an animal in killing, harming, and benefiting in the normal course of events—as witnessed in predatory beasts, humans, and others—would be REJECTED."
4.
,,By this investigation, the weakness of the Hanafis' statement appears: that "if he believes the devils do for him whatever he wishes, he is a disbeliever, but if he believes it is an illusion and a deception, he does not commit disbelief." Rather, they should have elaborated on this absolute statement; for the devils used to perform for Solomon, peace be upon him, what he commanded them of sanctuaries, statues, and the like.
If the sorcerer believes that God, Mighty and Majestic is He, subjected the devils to him because of the properties of his own soul along with his medicines, it is DIFFICULT to declare him a disbeliever."](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HH-Xb4uXQAEonE8.png)
![Dialectism's tweet photo. May Allah punish you with a layer deeper than Firaun for your lies. you're a Jahil and a Fasiq, at worst a Kafir, but may Allah excuse you for your deficient brain. Now go takfir the Ulamah of the Shafiiyyah and Malikiyyah ya ibnul Sahir
1.
,,That is because the issue of labeling everything called sorcery as "disbelief" is extremely problematic according to our principles, for sorcerers rely on things that the rules of Sharia refuse to label as disbelief, such as the action of the stones mentioned before this issue. Likewise, they gather drugs and place them in rivers, wells, water jars, or graves of the dead, or in a door that opens to the East or other such places. They believe that the effects occur during those matters due to the properties of their souls, which God Almighty created to link between them and those effects when there is sincere resolve, as previously mentioned. Thus, we cannot declare them disbelievers for gathering drugs, nor for placing them in wells, nor for their belief that those effects occur through that action, because they have tried that and found it does not fail them due to the properties of their souls. Thus, that belief became like the belief of physicians that effects occur upon drinking drugs due to the properties of the natures of those drugs and the properties of the souls. It is not possible to declare them disbelievers for it, because it is not from their earning, nor is it disbelief without an earned act. As for their belief that the stars do that, it is by the power of God Almighty."
2.
,,I said: Regarding what he stated—that one cannot be accused of disbelief [i.e Takfir] for collecting medicines and other such actions—this is correct. This is if the collection and all such actions are not intended to bring about the required effects by themselves. However, if they were intended as such, then it is the kind of magic that is disbelief in itself, because it involves the belief that these things have influence [independent of God], or it is evidence of disbelief according to the Maliki [And Shaafi] school, and God knows best."
3.
,,As for his not being accused of disbelief for that—EVEN IF THEY BELIEVED THAT THE STARS AND DEVILS DO THAT BY THEIR OWN POWER AND NOT BY THE POWER OF GOD ALMIGHTY—some Shafi'i scholars said: This is the position of the Mu'tazilites regarding the independence of animals' actions by their own power without the power of God Almighty. Just as the Mu'tazilites are NOT accused of disbelief for that, these [people] and those who differentiate between them by saying that the stars are a subject of worship are not accused of disbelief. IF the belief in [independent] power and influence were disbelief, THEN the influence of an animal in killing, harming, and benefiting in the normal course of events—as witnessed in predatory beasts, humans, and others—would be REJECTED."
4.
,,By this investigation, the weakness of the Hanafis' statement appears: that "if he believes the devils do for him whatever he wishes, he is a disbeliever, but if he believes it is an illusion and a deception, he does not commit disbelief." Rather, they should have elaborated on this absolute statement; for the devils used to perform for Solomon, peace be upon him, what he commanded them of sanctuaries, statues, and the like.
If the sorcerer believes that God, Mighty and Majestic is He, subjected the devils to him because of the properties of his own soul along with his medicines, it is DIFFICULT to declare him a disbeliever."](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HH-WllgXUAIG1VE.png)
![Dialectism's tweet photo. May Allah punish you with a layer deeper than Firaun for your lies. you're a Jahil and a Fasiq, at worst a Kafir, but may Allah excuse you for your deficient brain. Now go takfir the Ulamah of the Shafiiyyah and Malikiyyah ya ibnul Sahir
1.
,,That is because the issue of labeling everything called sorcery as "disbelief" is extremely problematic according to our principles, for sorcerers rely on things that the rules of Sharia refuse to label as disbelief, such as the action of the stones mentioned before this issue. Likewise, they gather drugs and place them in rivers, wells, water jars, or graves of the dead, or in a door that opens to the East or other such places. They believe that the effects occur during those matters due to the properties of their souls, which God Almighty created to link between them and those effects when there is sincere resolve, as previously mentioned. Thus, we cannot declare them disbelievers for gathering drugs, nor for placing them in wells, nor for their belief that those effects occur through that action, because they have tried that and found it does not fail them due to the properties of their souls. Thus, that belief became like the belief of physicians that effects occur upon drinking drugs due to the properties of the natures of those drugs and the properties of the souls. It is not possible to declare them disbelievers for it, because it is not from their earning, nor is it disbelief without an earned act. As for their belief that the stars do that, it is by the power of God Almighty."
2.
,,I said: Regarding what he stated—that one cannot be accused of disbelief [i.e Takfir] for collecting medicines and other such actions—this is correct. This is if the collection and all such actions are not intended to bring about the required effects by themselves. However, if they were intended as such, then it is the kind of magic that is disbelief in itself, because it involves the belief that these things have influence [independent of God], or it is evidence of disbelief according to the Maliki [And Shaafi] school, and God knows best."
3.
,,As for his not being accused of disbelief for that—EVEN IF THEY BELIEVED THAT THE STARS AND DEVILS DO THAT BY THEIR OWN POWER AND NOT BY THE POWER OF GOD ALMIGHTY—some Shafi'i scholars said: This is the position of the Mu'tazilites regarding the independence of animals' actions by their own power without the power of God Almighty. Just as the Mu'tazilites are NOT accused of disbelief for that, these [people] and those who differentiate between them by saying that the stars are a subject of worship are not accused of disbelief. IF the belief in [independent] power and influence were disbelief, THEN the influence of an animal in killing, harming, and benefiting in the normal course of events—as witnessed in predatory beasts, humans, and others—would be REJECTED."
4.
,,By this investigation, the weakness of the Hanafis' statement appears: that "if he believes the devils do for him whatever he wishes, he is a disbeliever, but if he believes it is an illusion and a deception, he does not commit disbelief." Rather, they should have elaborated on this absolute statement; for the devils used to perform for Solomon, peace be upon him, what he commanded them of sanctuaries, statues, and the like.
If the sorcerer believes that God, Mighty and Majestic is He, subjected the devils to him because of the properties of his own soul along with his medicines, it is DIFFICULT to declare him a disbeliever."](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HH-V14fXQAI-42T.png)
Olivia
Online
turn boomers into an ethnicity to genocide groyper
@Dialectism
CEO of Tabdee Inc. | Schaaf'i | 19 | Athari | wannabe Qadiri | larping as Akbarian | I do this for you Mercury, Saturn and Venus | Kurd, Palestinian & Iranian
Joined May 2025
254 Following
616 Followers
3K Posts
My goat.
Here’s one such magic square associated with al-Ghazali, as related by taskoprazade
@z2568656275063 Athar of Baybylonkan Mushrikeen? Are you imbecile even allowed to look outside out of your window? Also how am i making fun of the deen ya hmar
And from Abdallah b Umar who said:I heard the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him say: “I do not care what I do if I drink an antidote, OR HANG AN AMULET, or compose poetry from myself.”Narrated by Abu Dawud.
May Allah cut off your tongue, there is enough
I have no words anymore, anyone who claims to be a Muslim and peddles this garbage has left the religion. There is no share of the akhira for anyone who practices sihr.
"...They learned what harmed them and did not benefit them—although they already knew that whoever buys into magic would have no share in the Hereafter. Miserable indeed was the price for which they sold their souls, if only they knew!"
Quran 2:102
@z2568656275063 ill literally write up an amulet right now seal it in leather and hang it around me, tell me exactly how its sihr for it just being an amulet
Will i get skinned alive if i say Minecraft updates nowadays are 5 minute ideas presented like they took months of hardcore designing and creative decisions to make.
@hashimiyy_ @oghuzathari @Ahmedbhalmuslim they accuse one of being a magician, the moment they are challanged to put their afterlife at stake for their slander they tuck their balls in and put their head under the earth lmao
An ignorant person should be careful not to speak on texts beyond his level.
Imām al-Ghazālī is counted as the final member of Aṣḥāb al-Wujūh among the Shāfiʿiyyah.
Imām Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī himself, one of the senior authoritative verifiers of the Shāfiʿī school, explicitly states afterwards:
“There is no prohibition in it if it is used for a permissible purpose. However, if it is employed in aid of something unlawful, then that is different.”
He is discussing al-awfāq specifically, not black magic in the commonly understood sense. He then explains that Imām al-Qarāfī’s statement that awfāq are from siḥr is carried upon cases where they are used for unlawful purposes.
Additionally, Imām al-Qarāfī is not some minor authority. He is among the greatest jurists and legal theorists of the Mālikī school.
There is nothing here involving seeking aid from other than Allah ﷻ, invoking jinn, calling upon spirits, or believing that anything besides Allah independently benefits or harms. Any benefit, if accepted, is only by the creation, will, and decree of Allah ﷻ.
Zealous laymen posting selective excerpts from technical works to score points, while ignoring the author’s own qualifications, is irresponsible and misleading.
@Hanabilah_108 @AMB_2K @yetoshi24 omg bruh you fucking moron do you think salafi only entails aqidah? stop being a dishonest mubtadi and just admit you both are salafis idk why you guys are acting like you're ignorant
@AMB_2K @yetoshi24 @Hanabilah_108 lmao what a subhuman iqlet retard you are, you literally have the same belief as an atheist lmao
@AMB_2K @yetoshi24 @Hanabilah_108 Salafi niggas believe in the evil eye but can't think 3 steps ahead on how its supposed to work
@AMB_2K @yetoshi24 @Hanabilah_108 try to read more about what scholars say about it retard, rather than just shitting yourself when you see geometric circles with names and numbers in them.
Also, yes, they are repeateable, they work by their own learnable mechanisms. imbecile.
https://t.co/9EBfUYipZq
May Allah punish you with a layer deeper than Firaun for your lies. you're a Jahil and a Fasiq, at worst a Kafir, but may Allah excuse you for your deficient brain. Now go takfir the Ulamah of the Shafiiyyah and Malikiyyah ya ibnul Sahir
1.
,,That is because the issue of labeling everything called sorcery as "disbelief" is extremely problematic according to our principles, for sorcerers rely on things that the rules of Sharia refuse to label as disbelief, such as the action of the stones mentioned before this issue. Likewise, they gather drugs and place them in rivers, wells, water jars, or graves of the dead, or in a door that opens to the East or other such places. They believe that the effects occur during those matters due to the properties of their souls, which God Almighty created to link between them and those effects when there is sincere resolve, as previously mentioned. Thus, we cannot declare them disbelievers for gathering drugs, nor for placing them in wells, nor for their belief that those effects occur through that action, because they have tried that and found it does not fail them due to the properties of their souls. Thus, that belief became like the belief of physicians that effects occur upon drinking drugs due to the properties of the natures of those drugs and the properties of the souls. It is not possible to declare them disbelievers for it, because it is not from their earning, nor is it disbelief without an earned act. As for their belief that the stars do that, it is by the power of God Almighty."
2.
,,I said: Regarding what he stated—that one cannot be accused of disbelief [i.e Takfir] for collecting medicines and other such actions—this is correct. This is if the collection and all such actions are not intended to bring about the required effects by themselves. However, if they were intended as such, then it is the kind of magic that is disbelief in itself, because it involves the belief that these things have influence [independent of God], or it is evidence of disbelief according to the Maliki [And Shaafi] school, and God knows best."
3.
,,As for his not being accused of disbelief for that—EVEN IF THEY BELIEVED THAT THE STARS AND DEVILS DO THAT BY THEIR OWN POWER AND NOT BY THE POWER OF GOD ALMIGHTY—some Shafi'i scholars said: This is the position of the Mu'tazilites regarding the independence of animals' actions by their own power without the power of God Almighty. Just as the Mu'tazilites are NOT accused of disbelief for that, these [people] and those who differentiate between them by saying that the stars are a subject of worship are not accused of disbelief. IF the belief in [independent] power and influence were disbelief, THEN the influence of an animal in killing, harming, and benefiting in the normal course of events—as witnessed in predatory beasts, humans, and others—would be REJECTED."
4.
,,By this investigation, the weakness of the Hanafis' statement appears: that "if he believes the devils do for him whatever he wishes, he is a disbeliever, but if he believes it is an illusion and a deception, he does not commit disbelief." Rather, they should have elaborated on this absolute statement; for the devils used to perform for Solomon, peace be upon him, what he commanded them of sanctuaries, statues, and the like.
If the sorcerer believes that God, Mighty and Majestic is He, subjected the devils to him because of the properties of his own soul along with his medicines, it is DIFFICULT to declare him a disbeliever."
![Dialectism's tweet photo. May Allah punish you with a layer deeper than Firaun for your lies. you're a Jahil and a Fasiq, at worst a Kafir, but may Allah excuse you for your deficient brain. Now go takfir the Ulamah of the Shafiiyyah and Malikiyyah ya ibnul Sahir
1.
,,That is because the issue of labeling everything called sorcery as "disbelief" is extremely problematic according to our principles, for sorcerers rely on things that the rules of Sharia refuse to label as disbelief, such as the action of the stones mentioned before this issue. Likewise, they gather drugs and place them in rivers, wells, water jars, or graves of the dead, or in a door that opens to the East or other such places. They believe that the effects occur during those matters due to the properties of their souls, which God Almighty created to link between them and those effects when there is sincere resolve, as previously mentioned. Thus, we cannot declare them disbelievers for gathering drugs, nor for placing them in wells, nor for their belief that those effects occur through that action, because they have tried that and found it does not fail them due to the properties of their souls. Thus, that belief became like the belief of physicians that effects occur upon drinking drugs due to the properties of the natures of those drugs and the properties of the souls. It is not possible to declare them disbelievers for it, because it is not from their earning, nor is it disbelief without an earned act. As for their belief that the stars do that, it is by the power of God Almighty."
2.
,,I said: Regarding what he stated—that one cannot be accused of disbelief [i.e Takfir] for collecting medicines and other such actions—this is correct. This is if the collection and all such actions are not intended to bring about the required effects by themselves. However, if they were intended as such, then it is the kind of magic that is disbelief in itself, because it involves the belief that these things have influence [independent of God], or it is evidence of disbelief according to the Maliki [And Shaafi] school, and God knows best."
3.
,,As for his not being accused of disbelief for that—EVEN IF THEY BELIEVED THAT THE STARS AND DEVILS DO THAT BY THEIR OWN POWER AND NOT BY THE POWER OF GOD ALMIGHTY—some Shafi'i scholars said: This is the position of the Mu'tazilites regarding the independence of animals' actions by their own power without the power of God Almighty. Just as the Mu'tazilites are NOT accused of disbelief for that, these [people] and those who differentiate between them by saying that the stars are a subject of worship are not accused of disbelief. IF the belief in [independent] power and influence were disbelief, THEN the influence of an animal in killing, harming, and benefiting in the normal course of events—as witnessed in predatory beasts, humans, and others—would be REJECTED."
4.
,,By this investigation, the weakness of the Hanafis' statement appears: that "if he believes the devils do for him whatever he wishes, he is a disbeliever, but if he believes it is an illusion and a deception, he does not commit disbelief." Rather, they should have elaborated on this absolute statement; for the devils used to perform for Solomon, peace be upon him, what he commanded them of sanctuaries, statues, and the like.
If the sorcerer believes that God, Mighty and Majestic is He, subjected the devils to him because of the properties of his own soul along with his medicines, it is DIFFICULT to declare him a disbeliever."](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HH-YiwZXQAAtYmB.png)
@slasshythere @jahooma there is a reason nobody pays that much for ads in india, mainly buying power
The entire current Minecraft discourse can be described by this image
@oohenno KI halim hat zu wenige falten
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Peneroka Sisi Gelap
Seen from Malaysia
ชอบแอบถ่ายสาวอาบน้ำ
Seen from Thailand
Lusu Punda
New SIGMA
Seen from Germany
Malay P0rn 6969
Seen from Indonesia
43!
Seen from Korea
Cerfia 
Seen from France
BUSTY BBW LOU - BIGGEST SLUT YOU'LL FIND!
Seen from United Kingdom
JOKER SAYFASI HOŞGELDİNİZ 🎉
Seen from Turkey
عاشق الأمهات
Seen from Egypt
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.1M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
108.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.2M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.5M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
86.7M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.5M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.1M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.3M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.4M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.4M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
60.9M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
CNN Breaking News
@cnnbrk
59.9M followers