@caraeightyone No one was ahead of Oscar to give him a tow, so he needed a super mega lap to steal the pole from George at the time. The best thing Oscar could do was be a team player by giving Lando a tow. And you can absolutely lock-up your tires intentionally, so I bet that was intentional๐คทโโ๏ธ
@some0nethere @81oscunt I stand corrected. I was looking at Lap 5. He did brake early, but he wasn't able to establish the required overlap of front axles (or at least alongside the mirror) per the rule, which the FIA had based their ruling upon checking the official document.
@ErwinLiszkowicz @81oscunt Bro, other motorsports have their own driving standards. IndyCar is not governed by FIA, but they have similar rules, especially on overtaking. You just proved that you're unaware of these stuff lmao
@some0nethere @81oscunt There are bunch of free ones (with ads) on Google by searching "F1 Telemetry Online." And based on the video, Kimi braked earlier than Oscar and followed Lando's racing line.
@UnskullSam@maybezax It was risky on RBR's side, yes, but it clearly had significant improvements. People discredit other drivers by saying they should be embarrassed but at the same time downplaying the fact that Max is a great driver AND has a good car.
@ErwinLiszkowicz @81oscunt You're kidding, right? lol Without a guideline, there will be no basis on the legality of an action. Everyone can have their own interpretation without a guideline. It's like a Grade 2 logic lol
@some0nethere @81oscunt It was a dive bomb. If you compare their telemetry, Oscar braked way too late. He was attempting to get ahead, but locked up his wheels when he realized he couldn't make it. That could've been avoid if only he was patient enough until a safe opportunity becomes available.
@AussieFuckery @81oscunt Dude, Kimi was always ahead. You can clearly see that Oscar's front axle wasn't alongside Kimi prior to apex. Kimi was following Lando's racing line.
@UnskullSam@maybezax If you actually looked at the FIA document, the new setup at Parc Ferme was the "changes in PU elements" and 'suspensions'. There's clearly an advantage because his performance gap was massive compared to quali with the old setup.
@syws_17@oopspiastri Charles said Oscar was optimistic on the inside, and it wasn't 'all on Oscar'. That means, he believes neither Kimi nor Oscar should take the full blame, but they have partial accountability.
@RossC_AFC@F1BigData Yeah, sure dude. I wonder why Webber is dead silent if there's sabotage. I mean, he was a very vocal one back in his days, and as Oscar's manager, he made sure that Oscar won't be a 2nd driver. But I guess it's more convenient to just make assumptions to cope. ๐ฅ
@buggerlugs___@F1Yapp3r@MattP1Gallagher Oh, being aggressive is totally fine. A lot of drivers do that. What's not okay is not knowing when not to be stupidly aggressive.
@aabs_1990@F1BigData Classic Lando hater with low IQ. Go watch DTS instead of F1. Here's the comparison. In SG (left), there was a car-width space, and their front axles are side-to-side. Oscar just stupidly squeezed himself.
@Messiahhh22 @landosmile With extensive scrutineering from the stewards, I doubt any forms of technical sabotage will go unnoticed, especially those are detectable by data logs. For instance, they sent an independent steward to protect Alonso in 2007 from alleged sabotage.
@SulloReport I'm this ๐คclose to starting a mission on Twitter with only 1 thing in mind: a demolition job against Oscar. I'll intentionally post misinformation and disinformation. ๐๐