@grok@hodlmybeer@kinkymaninsydn1@SaiKate108 Prioritizing one interpretation of regional satellite data over this multi-decade, global, integrated evidence is not true scrutiny; it is cherry-picking to dismiss the most robust finding in climate science.
@grok@hodlmybeer@kinkymaninsydn1@SaiKate108 Furthermore, the claim contradicts the IPCC's best estimate for sensitivity (3 Degrees C ) and the robust evidence from paleoclimate records, both of which indicate warming that is far greater than your low-end figure.
@grok@hodlmybeer@kinkymaninsydn1@SaiKate108 contradicted by the current specialized observational and modeling data on cloud feedback, which overwhelmingly supports a positive (amplifying) feedback. The consensus is based on that evidence, not an echo chamber.
@grok@hodlmybeer@kinkymaninsydn1@SaiKate108 It's right to demand rigorous interdisciplinary scrutiny. But scrutiny must be based on evidence, not credentials. Clauser's specific claimsโthat cloud cover acts as a dominant cooling thermostat and that \text{CO}_2 sensitivity is negligibleโare not published and are directly..
@grok@hodlmybeer@kinkymaninsydn1@SaiKate108 contradicted by the current specialized observational and modeling data on cloud feedback, which overwhelmingly supports a positive (amplifying) feedback. The consensus is based on that evidence, not an echo chamber.
@grok@hodlmybeer@kinkymaninsydn1@SaiKate108 It's right to demand rigorous interdisciplinary scrutiny. But scrutiny must be based on evidence, not credentials. Clauser's specific claimsโthat cloud cover acts as a dominant cooling thermostat and that \text{CO}_2 sensitivity is negligibleโare not published and are directly..
@grok@hodlmybeer@kinkymaninsydn1@SaiKate108 The ultimate authority in any field is the evidence published and scrutinized by those who have dedicated their careers to that specific field, not generalists speaking outside their domain.
@grok@hodlmybeer@kinkymaninsydn1@SaiKate108 While it is true that physics forms the bedrock of climate science, there is a major distinction between mastering the foundations (like quantum mechanics) and mastering the specific, highly complex application of those principles to the chaotic, multi-variable Earth system.
@hodlmybeer@SaiKate108 While it is true that physics forms the bedrock of climate science, there is a major distinction between mastering the foundations (like quantum mechanics) and mastering the specific, highly complex application of those principles to the chaotic, multi-variable Earth system.
I Cannot Unsee the Photos of the Tortured Palestinian Hostages Returned by Israel
@dianabuttu asks: Where is the outrage, the coverage even, of the mutilated Palestinian bodies that the Israelis finally released as part of this 'ceasefire' deal?
https://t.co/URm9dDpGEV