Diner Menu

Remember when the ocean went mad and we were to blame? 🇳🇱

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

Your children and children’s children will see,
it was wrong of you to just blindly agree.
For with hardship and blood, liberty will come near
but freedom is gone in the face of indifference and fear.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@Beach_Roy33 Ah jij hebt het Ipsos onderzoek dus? Kan je dat anders even delen met de trendrapportage erbij zodat we weten dat je het niet allemaal uit je grote teen hebt gezogen?

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@123Max6 @duin_dev @ajboekestijn Je kan het wel ontkennen maar we zitten vast in Europese regels waar “we” mee ingestemd hebben zonder enig inzicht wat voor effect dat op ons land heeft voor de middellange en lange termijn.

En daar kom je nooit meer vanaf tenzij je extreme stappen durft te nemen.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@123Max6 @duin_dev @ajboekestijn Dus daar hebben we soevereiniteit voor weggegeven. Je kn het mooier laten lijken dan het is, maar de waarheid is dat we veel minder te zeggen hebben in ons eigen land.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@ReMeij Behoorlijk rendabel, zeker als je de plantenvoedsel en het vlees wat het dier oplevert ook nog meerekent.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@pukkie010 @erikmouthaanRTL Continue. Bij ieder item over Trump moet je je steeds afvragen: wat vertellen ze niet?

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@123Max6 @duin_dev @ajboekestijn Als we nog steeds soeverein zijn, waarom hoor ik in het nieuws dan continue dat iets niet mag van Brussel?

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@123Max6 @duin_dev @ajboekestijn Maar ze willen soeverein blijven en dat kan nu net niet bij de EU. Je moet hoe dan ook mandaat, en dus soevereiniteit, moeten overdragen naar Brussel.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@rogertansey The “rampage” is well documented and public information, please point to the records supporting your claim?

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@123Max6 @duin_dev @ajboekestijn Dus juist niet bij de EU?

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@ajboekestijn Zoals vrede?

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@PoppoWit @chrisklomp Typisch geval van het ochtendgebed horen schallen maar niet weten waar de megafoon hangt.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@chrisklomp https://t.co/2ZasEx8KyL

[TaiigerBlue 🇨🇦 @TaiigerBlue]

Here's my read on the Ukraine Starlink/Starshield confusion: The press keeps conflating Starlink with Starshield.

The headlines and reporting that keep mentioning Starlink may have stemmed from the fact that Zelenskyy also falsely mentioned Starlink, when he should have said Starshield. Reporters don't know the difference and that gap is doing a lot of work.

Starlink is a commercial product and it's against its authorized terms to use it for offensive military action. That's what Starshield is for. So either Ukraine knowingly broke the authorized terms or they were using Starshield.

And from what we know, it was Starshield's speed that was throttled. Starshield is owned by the US government. SpaceX is contracted to run it on Starlink technology, but the government controls it.

These confusing headlines make people assume Musk ordered the slowdown of his own will. Conflicting anonymous sources with only parts of the story don't help either. But more likely, the US government ordered it and SpaceX followed through, per the contract.

Now look at Rubio's recent press conference. Reporters wrote about Starlink and asked about Starlink, so he answered about Starlink specifically. He used their error to say the government has nothing to do with Starlink and did not modify it, while mostly ignoring Starshield.

But during the conference he does mention Starshield and here are his exact words: "They are (SpaceX) in a contract with the United States military, like Starshield. That's a different matter because that is something we are purchasing and using. But in the case of Starlink, we're arguing that it just makes no sense..."

Rubio knows exactly what he's doing. He's being selective, taking advantage of the fact that reporters don't know any better, making it seem like the government had no say.

It's confusing the masses, so people don't know who to point to. Elon is being thrown under the bus but he likely did nothing he wasn't directed to do.

My theory: the US, either someone from the executive branch or Pentagon, throttled Starshield because Ukraine was using it for operations inside Russia, targeting infrastructure the US did not want hit.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@hissgoescobra You can’t sue a company for a product not working if you use that product against the t&c. Instead you open yourself up for being sued.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@rogertansey https://t.co/2ZasEx8cJd

[TaiigerBlue 🇨🇦 @TaiigerBlue]

Here's my read on the Ukraine Starlink/Starshield confusion: The press keeps conflating Starlink with Starshield.

The headlines and reporting that keep mentioning Starlink may have stemmed from the fact that Zelenskyy also falsely mentioned Starlink, when he should have said Starshield. Reporters don't know the difference and that gap is doing a lot of work.

Starlink is a commercial product and it's against its authorized terms to use it for offensive military action. That's what Starshield is for. So either Ukraine knowingly broke the authorized terms or they were using Starshield.

And from what we know, it was Starshield's speed that was throttled. Starshield is owned by the US government. SpaceX is contracted to run it on Starlink technology, but the government controls it.

These confusing headlines make people assume Musk ordered the slowdown of his own will. Conflicting anonymous sources with only parts of the story don't help either. But more likely, the US government ordered it and SpaceX followed through, per the contract.

Now look at Rubio's recent press conference. Reporters wrote about Starlink and asked about Starlink, so he answered about Starlink specifically. He used their error to say the government has nothing to do with Starlink and did not modify it, while mostly ignoring Starshield.

But during the conference he does mention Starshield and here are his exact words: "They are (SpaceX) in a contract with the United States military, like Starshield. That's a different matter because that is something we are purchasing and using. But in the case of Starlink, we're arguing that it just makes no sense..."

Rubio knows exactly what he's doing. He's being selective, taking advantage of the fact that reporters don't know any better, making it seem like the government had no say.

It's confusing the masses, so people don't know who to point to. Elon is being thrown under the bus but he likely did nothing he wasn't directed to do.

My theory: the US, either someone from the executive branch or Pentagon, throttled Starshield because Ukraine was using it for operations inside Russia, targeting infrastructure the US did not want hit.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@jimsciutto @GerberKawasaki https://t.co/2ZasEx8KyL

[TaiigerBlue 🇨🇦 @TaiigerBlue]

Here's my read on the Ukraine Starlink/Starshield confusion: The press keeps conflating Starlink with Starshield.

The headlines and reporting that keep mentioning Starlink may have stemmed from the fact that Zelenskyy also falsely mentioned Starlink, when he should have said Starshield. Reporters don't know the difference and that gap is doing a lot of work.

Starlink is a commercial product and it's against its authorized terms to use it for offensive military action. That's what Starshield is for. So either Ukraine knowingly broke the authorized terms or they were using Starshield.

And from what we know, it was Starshield's speed that was throttled. Starshield is owned by the US government. SpaceX is contracted to run it on Starlink technology, but the government controls it.

These confusing headlines make people assume Musk ordered the slowdown of his own will. Conflicting anonymous sources with only parts of the story don't help either. But more likely, the US government ordered it and SpaceX followed through, per the contract.

Now look at Rubio's recent press conference. Reporters wrote about Starlink and asked about Starlink, so he answered about Starlink specifically. He used their error to say the government has nothing to do with Starlink and did not modify it, while mostly ignoring Starshield.

But during the conference he does mention Starshield and here are his exact words: "They are (SpaceX) in a contract with the United States military, like Starshield. That's a different matter because that is something we are purchasing and using. But in the case of Starlink, we're arguing that it just makes no sense..."

Rubio knows exactly what he's doing. He's being selective, taking advantage of the fact that reporters don't know any better, making it seem like the government had no say.

It's confusing the masses, so people don't know who to point to. Elon is being thrown under the bus but he likely did nothing he wasn't directed to do.

My theory: the US, either someone from the executive branch or Pentagon, throttled Starshield because Ukraine was using it for operations inside Russia, targeting infrastructure the US did not want hit.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@WarintheFuture https://t.co/2ZasEx8cJd

[TaiigerBlue 🇨🇦 @TaiigerBlue]

Here's my read on the Ukraine Starlink/Starshield confusion: The press keeps conflating Starlink with Starshield.

The headlines and reporting that keep mentioning Starlink may have stemmed from the fact that Zelenskyy also falsely mentioned Starlink, when he should have said Starshield. Reporters don't know the difference and that gap is doing a lot of work.

Starlink is a commercial product and it's against its authorized terms to use it for offensive military action. That's what Starshield is for. So either Ukraine knowingly broke the authorized terms or they were using Starshield.

And from what we know, it was Starshield's speed that was throttled. Starshield is owned by the US government. SpaceX is contracted to run it on Starlink technology, but the government controls it.

These confusing headlines make people assume Musk ordered the slowdown of his own will. Conflicting anonymous sources with only parts of the story don't help either. But more likely, the US government ordered it and SpaceX followed through, per the contract.

Now look at Rubio's recent press conference. Reporters wrote about Starlink and asked about Starlink, so he answered about Starlink specifically. He used their error to say the government has nothing to do with Starlink and did not modify it, while mostly ignoring Starshield.

But during the conference he does mention Starshield and here are his exact words: "They are (SpaceX) in a contract with the United States military, like Starshield. That's a different matter because that is something we are purchasing and using. But in the case of Starlink, we're arguing that it just makes no sense..."

Rubio knows exactly what he's doing. He's being selective, taking advantage of the fact that reporters don't know any better, making it seem like the government had no say.

It's confusing the masses, so people don't know who to point to. Elon is being thrown under the bus but he likely did nothing he wasn't directed to do.

My theory: the US, either someone from the executive branch or Pentagon, throttled Starshield because Ukraine was using it for operations inside Russia, targeting infrastructure the US did not want hit.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@JohnnyFDK https://t.co/2ZasEx8cJd

[TaiigerBlue 🇨🇦 @TaiigerBlue]

Here's my read on the Ukraine Starlink/Starshield confusion: The press keeps conflating Starlink with Starshield.

The headlines and reporting that keep mentioning Starlink may have stemmed from the fact that Zelenskyy also falsely mentioned Starlink, when he should have said Starshield. Reporters don't know the difference and that gap is doing a lot of work.

Starlink is a commercial product and it's against its authorized terms to use it for offensive military action. That's what Starshield is for. So either Ukraine knowingly broke the authorized terms or they were using Starshield.

And from what we know, it was Starshield's speed that was throttled. Starshield is owned by the US government. SpaceX is contracted to run it on Starlink technology, but the government controls it.

These confusing headlines make people assume Musk ordered the slowdown of his own will. Conflicting anonymous sources with only parts of the story don't help either. But more likely, the US government ordered it and SpaceX followed through, per the contract.

Now look at Rubio's recent press conference. Reporters wrote about Starlink and asked about Starlink, so he answered about Starlink specifically. He used their error to say the government has nothing to do with Starlink and did not modify it, while mostly ignoring Starshield.

But during the conference he does mention Starshield and here are his exact words: "They are (SpaceX) in a contract with the United States military, like Starshield. That's a different matter because that is something we are purchasing and using. But in the case of Starlink, we're arguing that it just makes no sense..."

Rubio knows exactly what he's doing. He's being selective, taking advantage of the fact that reporters don't know any better, making it seem like the government had no say.

It's confusing the masses, so people don't know who to point to. Elon is being thrown under the bus but he likely did nothing he wasn't directed to do.

My theory: the US, either someone from the executive branch or Pentagon, throttled Starshield because Ukraine was using it for operations inside Russia, targeting infrastructure the US did not want hit.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@ewaldeng Precies, ze willen ze er ook helemaal niet bij hebben.

Zo hypocriet.

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@kaitlancollins E … U … L … A

[Diner Menu @DinerMenu]

@LauRademakers1 Nee dat meen je niet, dus Trump wordt niet voor een derde termijn president?