@ShawnKelle12145@Revolutioig9 Attempting to disengage from the clearly dangerous group would probably be tactical unwise given that she would be at great risk if her focus was on retreating. This is a situation where neutralizing one or more of the members of the group would be more appropriate.
@ToddKaighin@PinkNews I agree, it is horrific these men attempted to enter a woman’s bathroom, refused to comply with requests that they leave, fought with members of the public as well as the police.
The mental illness that these men have is a serious problem!
You don’t necessarily have the right to information local, state, and federal governments collect. You can lobby your elected officials but it’s not necessarily something that I support. The network of cameras is expensive to operate and the intent of operating it is to assist law enforcement.
You are free to build your own camera network if you want data about the public but you can’t obtain content that the public invested in collecting and then turn around and use it for a different purpose.
@AmphibDeckape@mattvanswol The cameras are owned by either municipal governments or private corporations. You don’t have the right to content that others have collected. For example, I own a camera that is on my home and records the public street. You don’t have the right to content I record.
@LandmannDeborah@mattvanswol The fourth amendment protects people against unreasonable searches. You don’t have the right to prevent others from observing the world and recording their observations. You may not like Flock but it’s none of your business; the have the freedom to observe and record.
@TeamDianaForTN Let’s teach firearm safety and self defense skills so that when the children become adults they are prepared to be first responders.
Many adults have zero or near zero capability to defend themselves and others. When seconds matter the police are minutes away.