Domais

American

[Domais @Domais3]

@Kevin_D_53 @seanfeucht Sorry, for 2, I mean nouns preceding it

[Domais @Domais3]

@Kevin_D_53 @seanfeucht 1. There is no conjunction. He did not say "Foreigners, aliens, AND who belong to..." In English, when you are listing items you need a conjunction
2. The phrase, "who belong to the families of ambassadors..." is a restrictive clause that limits the blind preceding it.

[Domais @Domais3]

@Kevin_D_53 @seanfeucht Therefore, he is only taking about the children of foreign diplomats.

[Domais @Domais3]

@stevechapmanjr1 @chefjoseandres You are misreading the quote. It says that everyone born in the US is a citizen except children of foreign diplomats

[Domais @Domais3]

@Chester1799 @PheelophJohnson @Pharaoh_Jake @chriswithans If illegals weren't subject to the jursdiction of the US, then ICE would have no jursdiction to arrest and deport them.

[Domais @Domais3]

@PeteTruthUSA Haven't they already done that?

[Domais @Domais3]

@end_lawfare @RonDeSantis @HBHPatriot1 Well, since the child is a citizen of the US they are also a citizen of Florida. Florida has not choice but to treat the child as a citizen because they are.

[Domais @Domais3]

@WheelmanForHire So the plain meaning of the Constitution changes over time? How are you not advocating for judical activism?

[Domais @Domais3]

@DickZorro @end_lawfare @RonDeSantis @HBHPatriot1 How else would it work? Marbury v. Madison is implied by the supremacy clause.

[Domais @Domais3]

@DickZorro @end_lawfare @RonDeSantis @HBHPatriot1 What are you talking about? Per the Constitution, the Supreme Court is the supreme tribunal and the Constitution provides thar the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the supreme law of the land. The laws of the states are not the supreme law of the land.

[Domais @Domais3]

@justin_highrize I don't agree. There are certain fudmental rights that drive from the Natural Law that are so obvious such as the freedom of religion, that it do dangerous to allow the government to take them away.

If we embraced state's rights then Jim Crow would still exist.

[Domais @Domais3]

@BasedAF1776X @Tomv55308850 @StephenM Yeah but the debates around the amendments passage contradicts your claim. This clause was intended to give every human being born in the US citizenship except the children of foreign diplomats and Native Americans (they were seen as belonging a different political body)

[Domais @Domais3]

@ItsWrathful1 @scotus_wire So, you don't support the equal protect of and the due process the law? Without 14a, the bill of rights only applies to the feds. This means that any state could disarm you, violation your freedom of speech, and ban your religion legally.

[Domais @Domais3]

@ThomGallagher27 @AngelaBelcamino It says that every other class of person born in the US besides the children of diplomats are citizens of the US

[Domais @Domais3]

@end_lawfare @RonDeSantis @HBHPatriot1 The Constitution says the federal law is the supreme law of the land. Any states rights exists only on the context of what the Constitution allows. The Supreme Court is the institution that decides what the Constitution means. Sorry.

[Domais @Domais3]

@MustangEllie444 @RonDeSantis There is a process for everything. If we are so committed to the Constitution, then this decision should be lauded as correct based upon the plain meaning of the text. God isn't going to do anything, only the living can change this (as unlikely as that is)

[Domais @Domais3]

@realCarnasis @coachchetmanley @america No, that doesn't prove anything. All that says is that diplomats' children are not citizens.