@plain_wild@NBA__Courtside I think some would but some of their jumpers were kind of broke fr. I just reject the idea that everyone would just automatically be good shooters now. I’ll never understand why they didn’t get better back then at a shot that would get them an extra point every time they made it
@Twopoint0h__@NotThe12GAF Bron obviously my 🐐 but I don’t disagree with much here. I think Shaq could’ve been as dominant (maybe more so numbers wise) without Kobe but I doubt it would’ve translated to winning. They needed each other. All the greats need great running mates to win tbh
@plain_wild@NBA__Courtside I think Scott could be a good shooter in todays game, not sure about Coop. I think they would hold their own a lot better than the majority of teams from that era but would still struggle due to spacing IMO. You’re right about Kareem. They’d still be entertaining as hell tho.
@overtime I mean MJ prob wins but I think Podz(who I think isn’t a very good nba player in 2026) would give him trouble bc MJ is used to guarding much less talented guards and/or non athletes.
@Twopoint0h__@NotThe12GAF Thanks bro! Kind of fair point but I’m not sure Kobe had too much to do with it. Orlando Shaq was already a beast, he just got stronger than hell in LA and nobody could deal with him.
@HomemadeLeba@LeBronFactory So accolades…Lolol the lack of competition at MJs position in the league plays heavily into that. Once again no one wants to compare them and their skill sets as actual players. What do you think MJ is better at on the basketball court than Bron? Free throws?