NW BC resident on Gitxsan territory in 2-Mile (motto is Historically Non-Confirming). Former BC NDP Stikine MLA, cabinet minister and Hazelton muni councillor
@Bzubyk Wrong. You don’t argue your point with the Speaker. Taught that by numerous parliamentarians as a rookie. Same mentorship missing. Whether it pertained to another party member or a colleague. It’s about respect for the institution. You can object by point of order.
Who would you believe when it comes to First Nations issues in British Columbia?
Geoff Plant or Pierre Poilievre/Caroline Elliott?
Here are some quotes:
“No, I don’t think people should be worried,” said Plant, attorney general under Premier Gordon Campbell.
“If you, like me, live in a house in a neighbourhood in a city, some nice tree growing in front of it, you’re not at risk. If you’re planning a $25 billion mining project in northeastern British Columbia, then you better sit and do some work about who the Indigenous people are in that territory and find out how you can engage with them.
“There is nothing in Cowichan that is intended to unsettle what I’ll call ordinary private property ownership in British Columbia.”
Yes, yes they do. I can’t think of a single nation on the mid or north coast in favour of a bitumen pipe
So if it goes that route, it’ll have to proceed without Indigenous support, which will be near impossible given their reliance on fisheries and how that plays into EA review
@atrupar When a president responds to serious questions about war by calling a reporter "fake" and "treasonous," that’s not strength. It’s insecurity.
Real leaders explain their strategy to the people paying the price. He had none.
@atrupar If the victory was total and complete, why is Iran able to shut down 20% of the world's oil supply and jack up gasoline prices to $6 a gallon here in America?
@Sharisraven@JasonBeck82@FIFAcom FIFA forced the BC Sports Hall of Fame to move out and shut down for two months so they could use the space for a media centre. No compensation for the operators, and the employees will be on lay off for the two months.
We’re getting ahead of wildfires. But there’s a role for each and every British Columbian to play in learning to live with wildfire.
We have the resources. From our #BCWildfire Service to our @BCFireSmart program.
Take a moment to read and learn more:
https://t.co/l3ku7aLFWl
Category 2 & 3 fire prohibitions are in effect throughout much of BC
If you’re planning on travelling during this long weekend please stay safe and prepared
Please take precaution with any fire use stay up-to-date on wildfire activity
Stay up to date with the #BCWildfire App
This is the most important, most brilliant, and most well written thing you could read today.
If you’re an Albertan, or a Canadian, and read nothing else, fine. Just read this.
Goodness me. Every word. https://t.co/TliiUbwj6H
LIES. This is a park pass and Harman knows that. They’ve been going on for years
BTW. Shittiest MLA we’ve had in my lifetime. SFA has gotten done for Langley.
CPBC is a joke.
Iain Black’s plan would lead to a $25 billion deficit — an economic situation even worse than what we’ve seen under the NDP.
I’m happy to debate @iainblackbc and challenge him to defend his plan, because as Finance Critic, I see nothing more than a campaign designed to win votes, not solve the serious issues facing our province.
#bcpoli #readytoleadbc
This is who she is and where the BC Conservative party is going. Conflict of interest if you're married to an indigenous person. Why not conflict of interest if you're friends with one? Racial purity politics.
A”conflict of interest” because his wife is Indigenous and he might care about First Nations people is the most on-brand racist conservative belief! And his response basically being, “no no I vote against them all the time,” is even crazier.
😒🤦🏽♀️#bcpoli
Iain Black is now promising a 20% across-the-board tax cut in his bid to lead the BC Conservative Party.
Sound familiar?
Because British Columbians have seen this movie before.
In 2001, the Gordon Campbell government came to power promising major tax relief and a new era of economic freedom. The centerpiece was a 25% income tax cut across the board.
At first, people celebrated.
But what came later?
❗ HST without a mandate
❗ Carbon tax
❗ Rising fees and costs
❗ Healthcare restructuring
❗ Labour conflict
❗ Centralized power
❗ Growing distrust in government
The problem was never just the tax cut itself. The problem was what came after.
When governments dramatically reduce revenue but continue growing spending, the money has to come from somewhere. And British Columbians eventually paid for it through consumption taxes, fees, cost increases, and policies that hit working and middle-class families the hardest.
And here is the part voters should not ignore:
Iain Black was THERE.
He was not an outsider watching it happen. He was:
✔ Cabinet Minister
✔ Treasury Board member
✔ Part of the decision-making structure during the Campbell era
Now he is offering the same kind of promise again.
So British Columbians should be asking a very serious question:
If history repeats itself, what comes after the 20% tax cut?
Another HST-style shift?
More hidden cost increases?
More taxes moved onto consumers?
More centralized government decisions sold as “necessary”?
Because history matters.
And the Campbell government is proof that tax-cut promises can quickly become something very different once political reality sets in.
The warning signs are already there.
British Columbians were promised affordability before. What many got instead was one of the most unpopular governments in provincial history.
So before voters get swept up in another big tax-cut promise, they should ask themselves one thing:
Are they hearing a new vision for BC…
Or are they watching the sequel to a political era that already burned public trust once before?
😳😳😳😳
Why don’t the B.C. Conservatives understand this bill has not passed?
Do they not know there are two more entire stages of debate before Royal assent?
Le sigh.
This MLA either has zero understanding of the basic process of bill stages OR she does and is purposefully misleading her constituents.
Both are problematic.