@Vasudanin@Anon06061@charliersmith1 Telling a woman who’s been AI disrobed against her will that she should be happy for ‘engagement’ is not common sense.
“A report by The New York Times revealed that third-party advertisers like Canada Proud ran disinformation campaigns targeting Mark Carney. The Financial Times also exposed a coordinated campaign on X to support Poilievre and attack Carney’s reputation.” https://t.co/JIlwVvdBsd
@jeffsheehan@CoachDanGo@eskomobar Who cares how many push-ups these characters can do? It has zero, nothing, nada to do with the skills required to do their jobs.
@RpsAgainstTrump MTG is headed in the right direction. Give her some grace and maybe she’ll develop the cojones to speak out against the toxin at the top.
@CarlBovisNature I have followed you for a few years now, and ISO admire your skill! This is the first time I have seen a photo of you. Thank you! Best wishes for your continued success.
@FoxNews Yes, until I delved into his accounts (for context, as all the right is insisting upon) I really had no idea what a racist, misogynistic, smug man he was. Just over the top Strom Thurmond level views. I am sorry he died. Not a good man.
"Waaah it was taken out of context" no it wasn't you ghoul. Any time someone quotes what he said, I see you sweaties crying "what he actually meant was..." You dipshits can't pick a lane: either Charlie Kirk was this great debater, orator and communicator, or he's a mush-mouthed moron who regularly said inflammatory things that could be easily misconstrued. Which is it? You loser pedophile-defenders do this with Trump all the time. "What he actually meant was." No, fuck that. They said it, they own it. We know what they meant. We don't need this after-the-fact revisionist history to make them sound more moral than they were. Kirk didn't deserve to get assassinated and he was an awful person with awful views. Both things can be true.