@PapkeGerhard@dale_wen The Germans failure to adopt renewables and nuclear are in the top 2 worst things that nation has done and leaves them critically dependent on Russian oil
@WestEschaton@hunterbonair The point of the larger zone is to remove the grazing debate. Make the zone one half ball lager but require >50% of the ball within the zone. Doesn’t really take into account the 3d nature of the strike zone but at that point it’s pedantic
This is a pretty interesting case. I’ve hesitated weighing in on it because it is better covered in its own book(s).
Sea lions are having measurable population level impacts on Columbia River salmon particularly at what are called bottleneck sites like the Bonneville Dam (these fish live in the ocean and swim upriver to spawn, called anadromous fish in ecology). Sea lions hammer them as they wait to climb up the fish ladders to pass the dams.
Columbia River salmon management is an extremely complicated system, so I’ll hit on the highlights. There’s not a single stock of salmon that do their spawning run up the Columbia, there are different stocks that enter the river and pass dams at different times. These 13 different stocks are managed as “evolutionarily significant units” (ESUs). ESUs are designations under American endangered species law to define distinct populations of salmon that might be endangered (2 of 13). ESUs mean fish with a reproduction process is isolated from other stocks and they’re an important part of the evolutionary legacy of the fish (unique coloration, size etc).
There are two federally endangered Columbia River salmon ESUs (and many more threatened) these are the Upper Columbia River Spring Run Chinook and the Snake River Sockeye. These are the earliest arrivers so predation is heavy when the sea lions congregate below the Bonneville. To address this, strict federal protections on marine mammals (Marine Mammal Protection Act MMPA) will need to be lifted to allow for regulated hunting to protect Endangered Species Act listed salmon stocks.
The reason Congress is stepping in here is because the MMPA is a statute enacted by Congress and changes to it can only be made by Congress. There is a section in the MMPA for limited seal/seal lion removal under the condition when impacts to ESA listed species occur. In 2018 for example some tribes were given hunting privileges and some nonlethal removal has occurred in the past but it’s extremely expensive and slow (federal permitting). So to make lethal removals faster and cheaper while still complying with the MMPA, Congress has to give states more flexibility (without federal permitting) to enable a harvest.
Because these are lib states, my guess is 1) none of this will ever happen because the NGOs will step in and stop it with lawsuits, 2) instead of state agencies opening a season for resident and nonresident hunters (could be a huge revenue opportunity) it’ll be an expensive and unpopular government cull.