@DukeNukem1996 Well, I legitimately have all my favorite guns in Soldier of Fortune 2 now. It's why I picked that as my "games with the best guns".
Favorite knife: Rambo 2 (Mission) knife
Favorite pistol: M1911A1
Favorite magnum: Desert Eagle
Favorite shotgun: SPAS-12
China is a massive net food importer while the US is a huge exporter of grain and meat and grows far more staple calories than it eats.
What are you talking about
Brazil has a two-part election system. If no one gets the majority (50%+) in the first election, then there's a second election between two top vote-getters from the first election.
In the entire history of Brazil, there has never been an election where the person who got the most votes in the first election goes on to lose the second election.
Until now.
In the first election, Bolsonaro received 2.2 million more votes than Lula. But Lula magically received 4.4 million votes more than Bolsonaro in the runoff.
How did he do it? Illegally.
One of the eleven members of Brazil's Supreme Court ordered the polls to stay open for an extra two hours. There was no legal way for that to happen - Brazil's laws don't allow a Supreme Court justice to order polls to stay open.
Even more amazing is the fact that he ordered it after the polls were supposed to have closed. The polls in the more conservative districts had already closed, but for some reason the polls in the districts that favored Lula stayed open. Gee, I wonder how they knew they were going to be illegally ordered to stay open?
So they bussed in people from districts who favored Lula and had them vote after the polls were supposed to be closed. Then, Lula declared himself the winner, and moved to arrest his opponent (Bolsonaro's father, a former president of Brazil, is already spending 24 years in prison).
Fortunately, Marco Rubio had State issue visas to Bolsonaro and his family, and spirited him out of Brazil ahead of the police moving to arrest him.
As far as I'm concerned, he is the legal president in exile. I don't know what steps our government can take, but knowing President Trump, I suspect that something is being planned as we speak.
homes, so that gives them one more opportunity to avoid a fight.
The problem comes from thinking the latter is enough, which is why you have the loaded gun. A verbal command is better than racking the shotgun, though.
Still, Rule 4 of gun safety, gentlemen.
While I think "rack the shotgun and you'll scare the bad guy" is retarded, I also think this argument is retarded too. I can't think of a single incident where someone died because they "gave away their position" in home defense. The problem is relying solely on intimidation.
Incidentally, to add to this, there is actually some value in informing the bad guy that you're actually home. One, if it's not a bad guy but a family member or friend, it gives them an opportunity to identify themselves. Two, most bad guys want easy targets and go after empty