๐ Win the Ultimate Fitness Coach Bundle worth $7,999! ๐ช Enter now & earn bonus entries by sharing with friends. One lucky winner chosen on 4/9/26. #NHFAGiveaway https://t.co/mnubA3EUz3
๐จ
I have moved a bill to abolish the Department of Multiculturalism NSW.
I HATE the policy of multiculturalism and support assimilation - here's why.
Most of the immigration debate in recent years has been about total numbers. The government has let in too many migrants too quickly and weโre suffering overpriced housing, overcrowded cities, overburdened infrastructure etc.
This is why I advocate for a five-year immigration pause ... but it's only half the story. We also need to have a serious rethink about how we encourage migrants to assimilate into Australian culture.
The woke left claim Australia doesnโt have any unique culture. They claim that our culture is โmulti-cultureโ ... but that is logically incoherent and just plain wrong.
Itโs true Australians have come from many countries, but over the centuries we have developed an Australian identity that is more than the sum of its parts.
Contrary to our political and cultural elites, most Australians still like Australia. We like our people, our history, our traditions and our way of life.
We do not want our culture to be replaced by a sudden influx of millions of foreigners. Most of these foreigners might be wonderful people, they might bring skills, have fun festivals and spicy foods, and they might be able to tick the โnot a terroristโ box on the arrival form โฆ but even if all of that is true, people who like the existing Australian culture (i.e. most of us) do not want to see our culture so casually replaced by a hodgepodge of foreign cultures.
That is why the migrants that have arrived should be expected to integrate into our way of life and assimilate into our culture. This is not a radical position. It has worked well with earlier waves of Australian immigration, and the same would be expected from you if you migrated to Japan or Brazil.
We donโt need to be pricks about it โฆ the process can take time, and obviously people will remember where they came from โฆ but assimilation is preferable to division and Balkanisation.
And yet the government promotes the exact opposite.
Rather than encouraging integration, or just leaving people alone to gradually assimilate, the NSW government has an agency dedicated subsidising our differences.
Multicultural NSW employs 140 bureaucrats and spends roughly $70 million of taxpayersโ money to encourage new migrants to stick with their old culture.
They are literally using our money to ensure that immigration causes more division and sectarianism than it would do otherwise. The agency needs to be scrapped. Afuera!
Abolishing Multicultural NSW would not ban people from eating Mexican food or celebrating Chinese New Year or speaking Polish. To each their own. But thereโs no reason for the rest of the population to pay for these choices.
To rub salt into the wound, NSW Premier Ho Chi Minns then uses the existence of multiculturalism to justify censorship. He has claimed several times over the last year that multiculturalism is not compatible with vibrant free speech. A reasonable person would see this as an argument against multiculturalism, but amazingly Minns uses this as an argument against free speech!
The people of NSW and Australia were never asked about this trade off. Instead, the political class has taken our money to subsidise cultural division, and then used that division to justify cracking down on our free speech. This is Orwellian.
That is why the Libertarian Party has introduced a bill into NSW parliament to abolish Multicultural NSW and replace it with nothing. I encourage other MPs in other state parliaments to move a similar bill.
This bill will come on for debate in coming months. Labor will obviously oppose but will be interesting to see how the Libs and Nats vote.
If this repeal bill fails (for now) and taxpayers continue to be forced to fund various ethnic groups etc I encourage the British Australian Community (BAC) to apply for funding. As a general rule, the larger the ethnic group, the more the funding ... so BAC should easily get more funding than all the other groups combined.
@LibertariansNSW@Brit_Aus_Com
Northrop Grumman & TRW - UFO Reverse Engineering, Material Exploitation, & Legacy Programs [Vol.2]
https://t.co/RRXRVoG2Qx
Discussions of US DOD/IC and corporate clandestine, deep-sixed Special Access Programs focused on the recovery, storage, and exploitation of Technologies of Unknown Origin are never complete without exploring the alleged involvement of defense prime contractors, such as Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, etc.
Indeed, according to my legacy program framework, primes operate at the lowest knowledge and access threshold within UFO programs - operating under FFRDCs or their government handler, with only need-to-know personnel being read into such activities in an operational capacity.
However, there seems to be one prime that breaks this mold...... @northropgrumman
In the recent @MegynKellyShow featuring David Grusch, Grusch stated in the onset of the War on Terror, select contractors began to harness IRAD (Independent Research and Development) to essentially self-fund their own breakaway UFO retrieval and exploitation activities.
I am supremely confident that the contractor in question is Northrop Grumman.
So today's investigation serves as a part two to investigating Northrop Grumman..... Volume 1 sought to investigate IF Northrop, throughout its storied history, has engaged in UFO retrieval and, most importantly, exploitation programs. Volume 2 today seeks not to answer if, but instead the who, what, when, where, and why of Northrop's NHI recovery and exploitation activities.
Of course, it wouldn't be a worthy investigation into Northrop without an extensive discussion of TRW, Northrop's 2002 crown jewel defense, aerospace, and automotive acquisition that features its own storied history of allegations of UFO crash retrieval operations.
So this investigation seeks to study TRW in-depth and TRW's spinoff FFRDC the @AerospaceCorp , critical personnel within TRW and the Aerospace Corporation critical to shaping both Northrop's and the modern-day legacy program structure, TRW's integration into Northrop Grumman's Mission and Space Systems, personnel that served across both TRW and Northrop I believe have played an imparitive role in Northrop's legacy involvemnet, Northrop's modern day program security archetecture, what happened to Northrop's own answer to the Lockheed Skunkworks that seemingly went black, possible decrepit and non-descript sites where Northrop may engage in such operations, and most importantly - seek to answer the question of IF Northrop Grumman has indeed maintained it's own "breakaway" UFO retrieval and exploitation programs since the early 2000s barely accountable to their original government handler.
Throughout this project, numerous critical questions will be explored:
1) Extrapolating from the recent words of David Grusch on Megyn Kelly, did Northrop Grumman harness IRAD (Independent Research and Development) funds in the onset of the War on Terror to self-fund their own UFO retrieval and exploitation programs, unaccountable from their original government handler?
2) What can we learn about Stephanie O'Sullivan, former Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, former TRW engineer, and current Aerospace Corporation board member, that David Grusch stated managed the UFO crash retrieval issue alongside James Clapper in ODNI
3) What critical personnel within TRW, Northrop Grumman, and TRW's spinoff FFRDC, the Aerospace Corporation, served critical roles in Northrop/TRW's legacy effort and helped shape the current secrecy structure of UFO Legacy Programs
4) Does Northrop Grumman maintain clandestine underground operations below the Northrop Tejon Radar Cross-Section facility, which was officially closed in 2011?
5) What became of Northrop's answer to the Lockheed Skunkworks, the Northrop Advanced Technology & Design Center that disappeared in the late 90s?
6) What became of TRW Systems Group and its "Special Projects" that were absorbed into Northrop Grumman Missions and Space Systems?
8) How do Northrop and TRW's legacy activities connect back to the 1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash retrieval?
9) Why did TRW get busted for over half a dozen IRAD fraud schemes prior to its purchase by Northrop, and why did Northrop pay hundreds of millions to settle such disputes?
10) What can we learn from a 1982 memo from the CIA Directorate of Science and Technology that stated the agency wished to funnel IRAD funds through select contractors, such as TRW, for the Agency's own interests?
11) Does Terry Phillips spearhead the modern-day security apparatus protecting Northrop's clandestine UFO activities?
12) So much more...
@SunOfAbramelin thank you for your courage in bringing forward senior individuals within Northrop Grumman who have engaged in whistleblower reprisals in their former USG career. Strange how Northrop attracts so many of Legacy's deputized assets following their retirement!
Racing NSW has released the reasoning for appointing an administrator to the ATC as the warring parties await the outcome of Supreme Court action on Thursday.
READ MORE ๐ https://t.co/Kz1A9FnNFy