There can be NO sustainable food systems without livestock. If you haven't thought about agriculture this way, please consider this - It's the production of biomass - the majority of which is NOT edible by humans. Even food crops produce more inedible biomass. As Prof Windisch says, livestock are the "win-win-win."
Thanks to @LivestockVoice for this short video.
https://t.co/v3FdU3OiF6
Agroecology for a Sustainable Agriculture and Food System: From Local Solutions to Large-Scale Adoption
New @aecp_eth paper led by Frank Ewert @zalf_leibniz in the Annual Review of Resource Economics @AnnualReviews
https://t.co/fScB3MYqTF
I applaud Oxford and Leverhulme for organizing this debate, and I do think it is sorely needed. Unfortunately, a disappointment, albeit an expected one. IMO, the winner of the debate is the audience member who asserts that they are actually in agreement, despite flaws from both.
Like most academics, my email is a black hole. Still, I try to respond to all grad student emails regardless if they're at "my" univ or not. But if you email me to pick my brain on Indig research, I will first ask: do you or any of your PhD advisors identify as Indigenous? 1/
Ecological theory and experience tells us that just leaving a heavily degraded ecosystem to natural processes means we will be waiting a long time for nature recovery
There is nothing wrong with interventions to set these systems on a path of recovery https://t.co/dMMu74uqtQ
“Our place in the world is to manage our piece of the world,” Chook Chook Hillman, a Karuk community organizer and cultural practitioner, told NOVA. "That's part of the reciprocity that has allowed us to live here for so long.” https://t.co/4b3r1s0byr
There's a myth doing the rounds that livestock don't really contribute globally to the climate crisis (at least not to a meaningful degree) and that discussion of agricultural emissions is a ploy to distract from fossil fuels. Here's why that's dangerous nonsense - 🧵
This makes an interesting read, seems to evidence what many have known for a while... How not cow! But clearly we do use some land for ruminant feed that cld otherwise be used to grow hunan food. https://t.co/dTM2y3krFB @Bovidiva
Wild herbivores generate greenhouse gas emissions, too, not just domesticated ruminant livestock. This is a great example of how similar emissions between the two can be. Take away: We must include (baseline) emissions from wild herbivores when quantifying livestock emissions.
📢 It's out! The paper by @AgusBC3@gpardoBC3 and me (@BC3Research & @GCCGtweet) at #npjClimAtmosSci@Nature_NPJ on emissions in two savannas in northern Tanzania, one dominated by wild herbivores and the other dominated by ruminant livestock.
🧵
(1/9)
https://t.co/2omz6DWjJH
Biden said "we lose it all” if we warm beyond 1.5C. Unhelpful rhetoric, unsupported by the science. It's a continuum not a cliff. We've lost much already, and lose more with each fraction of a degree. If we miss the 1.5C exit ramp, we still go for 1.6C exit rather than give up.
I just cannot get over how they think the "lesson" is supposed to be trauma, and not a careful, mediated exploration of life and death that the project is actually meant to offer kids. It's a formative experience, and a difficult one. It doesn't not need to be traumatic.
Every time I see this, I struggle to reconcile this with the knowledge that Fair Board reps are nominated and elected. The toxic vibes are...incalculable.
A young girl didn’t want to slaughter the goat she raised for 4H. The state senator who bought the goat at auction agreed to let it live out its days eating weeds. But sheriff’s deputies drove 500 miles to kill the goat and teach a 9-year-old a lesson.
https://t.co/3U5dY27paR
At no point was his final destination obligatory. Since his buyer was not paying for processing, we could have picked him up and taken him home. Kids do it all the time. I chose to go through with it bc I was emotionally supported and prepared to experience the weight of loss.