Tucker Carlson says Ben Shapiro didn't get into Harvard Law School on his own, but was "clearly the beneficiary of unearned privilege." Carlson won't name names, but we can (((guess))) who he's blaming.
For the record: Shapiro started college at 16, graduated UCLA summa cum laude, then Harvard Law cum laude.
The idea of achievement based on merit is unfamiliar to Tucker Carlson. After all, we don't all have Hunter Biden writing our son's college recommendation letter, right Tucker?
The terror-loving nepo baby who VERBATIM demanded the NYPD be defunded NOW demands that the same officers risk their lives by traveling with his selfie-obsessed wife so she can make a personal visit to a country for which the US maintains a Level 4: do not travel advisory.
So-called “woke 1” was not just rhetoric; put in practice it denied people opportunities and ruined people’s lives.
Remember when wokesters would scour the social media history of teenagers and then send offending posts to universities like Harvard to get their college acceptances rescinded?
So all of the doctors will work for free?
And the professors to educate them?
And all of the supplies, equipment, and utilities given for free?
And the people who make those products and equipment will do so so freely?
And the grocers and farmers will feed them for free?
Apparently teh Joos also made Hunter snort cocaine, bang his sister-in-law and get his grieving sister-in-law addicted to drugs, upload his p0rn videos, abandon his younger daughter, and send photos of himself doing drugs to people. Wild.
We're watching an enormous misread of the results from Wisconsin. The dumb take is that the DSA has reached its ceiling, and the establishment is fighting back. That's totally wrong. The normie Dems are simply negotiating the terms of their surrender.
Those terms are obvious: the Democratic Party will ingest and mirror the key precepts of the DSA, and they won't go whole hog against DSA candidates who don't totally say the quiet part out loud. This is why Slotkin didn't endorse Stevens against El-Sayed in Michigan. It's why Schumer and Jeffries didn't endorse Cuomo against Mamdani in NYC.
In return, the DSA's most important figures will refrain from endorsing the very worst candidates. This is why Bernie and AOC didn't endorse Hong. If they had, she would have won.
The goal of the pact is obvious: candidates who are DSA in all but name, who receive unified Democratic support after the primaries, and who still have a shot at winning a general election. So don't be fooled: the DSA is driving the car, choosing the direction. The normie Dems are just negotiating over the speed.
People don’t realize how insanely inefficient some large hospitals are. Starting a first-case surgery at 10:45 and having 3 hour turnovers makes a huge difference in how many patients you can treat in a given week/month/year.
It means elective cases wait longer for care, urgent cases linger in the hospital longer, and the hospital loses money.
Then these hospitals will demand more taxpayer subsidies instead of just fixing the inefficiencies.
This is why competition matters.
Constitutional Carry is now law in 29 of the 50 states, including Texas as of 2021.
Not only has it not given rise to more gun crime, but it’s worked out just fine in states that have passed it.
Some will try to paint this as “radical” but I call it following the Constitution.
This isn't even remotely accurate.
California still has one of the highest absolute firearm homicide numbers in the nation, the highest per capita rate of mass public sh**tings, while simultaneously having some of the strongest g*n control laws in the nation AND having one of the worst recidivism rates in the country -- even AFTER "realigning" by redefining offenses and stopping the counting of certain crimes altogether to artificially lower your crime rates.
I've generally been supportive of Israel, but the way they made Hunter Biden become a crackhead, sleep with his brother's widow, abandon his child, photograph his degenerate behavior, store it all on a laptop, drop it off at a computer repair shop, and never pick it up is just crossing a line.
Thankfully we have Qatari foreign agent Tucker Carlson to explain it all.
People earning over $850k would not benefit from Medicare for all.
Those with high incomes would exit the system and pay cash, but would also have to pay this new tax. They wouldn’t be allowed to purchase the private insurance they want.
The middle class would also be worse off. They wouldn’t be able to afford the cash pay system. So they’d lose their private insurance and wouldn’t be able to afford the cash system of the rich.
The lower class would be worse off. They’d lose medicaid, and have to fight this new influx of beneficiaries for scarce access to care. Just like after medicaid expansion saw a huge influx in ER visits because nobody could access primary care, M4A would cause this increased demand with no increased supply. The lower class always loses out in that situation.
The people who would be better off: the middlemen and bureaucrats who would administer the system and the lobbyists who jockey for influence over the $5T government money.
My favorite genre of American radical is: “My childhood was comfortable, my education was elite, my career is white-collar, but unfortunately someone has more money than my family, so burn the system down.”
Gee I dunno... could it be because he said women on October 7th deserved to be raped? Or that America deserved 911? Or that we should kill capitalists and let the streets soak in their blood? Or that refugees who escaped communist regimes can suck his c*ck. @RollingStone you're disgusting for laundering this madness.