Rheumatologist via @CUAnschutz, @VirginiaMason, @IowaMed, @DrakeUniversity. Process improver. Lawful/Neutral Good. Wordplay: the pun is mightier than the sword.
@AaronGoodman33 As a subspecialist assessing multisystem diseases, I use “Consider” to comment on concepts outside my field or general internal medicine outside the reason I was consulted. Good specialty medicine requires good general medicine, and we can all pitch in
@BharatKumarMD@philseo@ACRheum Doing great and excited to be back in Iowa, with Iowa Arthritis and Osteoporosis Center in Des Moines! Best of luck in your newest venture 🍀
@MKIttlesonMD In Epic, using braces {} will highlight enclosed text and be F2-searchable, like ***, which I find nice for phrases that are not uniformly applicable
@jbcarmody Intriguing use! Exclusively for bureaucratic compliance, don’t trainees just need to binarily report whether they experienced duty hour violations? Simpler than comprehensively logging, though still a resident burden
✨ Approach to Infiltrative Diseases! ✨
This framework was inspired by @Gurpreet2015's recent Clinical Problem Solving Grand Rounds for @UCSFDOM. Many teaching points on this DDx also passed down by the @CPSolvers.
First, what are the Infiltrative Diseases?
@AshleyGWinter That being said, if the question is more about safety, rather than efficacy, it’s a generally good and well tolerated med. Avoid in diverticulITIS and monitor lipids. Will “artificially” normalize CRP (cannot use as biomarker). Wishing her well!
@AshleyGWinter TCZ great in GCA…but PMR-SPARE trial very preliminary and underwhelming. My take: *consider* TCZ if unable to taper steroids <10mg but not 1st-line. Start with pred 15-20mg, unless GCA features. Interested to hear from others and PMR-SPARE acolytes
Against Arguments Continued:
• Prognosis: decades of AS data to predict and counsel
• ⬇️Treatment response in nr-axSpA ➡️ implications for Pharma research 🔬💊
• Regressive lumping (e.g. PAN ➡️ DAD2, RPC ➡️ VEXAS)
Against Arguments:
• Different phenotypes: ⬆️female, ⬇️uveitis, ⬇️CRP in nr-axSpA
• Genetics: ⬇️ similarity
• Progression: only 19-27% progression to AS at means 5-11yr f/u
• Subgroup preservation: splitter > lumper. nr-axSpA diagnosis may be misdiagnosis