that_miserable_guy

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@Neo_1dealism Definitely will be reading this by Joachim!!

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@parhypostates @SimonSimplicio Sounds similar to arguments made by some British Idealists since to be known implies to be related to a Knowing Self, and if everything is knowable, it must all be related to a Knowing Self which unifies them, and thats God.

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@miltonappl3 @No5mallf3at Not rlly, Experience for James is more fundamental than the subject-idea dichotomy that Berkeley has. There’s also no God that sustains all ideas but only Pure-Experience.

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@Ahmed_the_world Schelling articulates this well in his freedom essays.

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@NoodlesKage This also goes against arguments that say Itachi can only beat him prep b.c Itachi is certain he can beat Obito not just as something he could do given prep.

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@basedwahhabi Not really, for example numbers aren’t married or unmarried, the categories of married and unmarried just don’t apply to it. Such is the case for concepts of “inner/outer” which derive from our concept of space. God is not spatial so those spatial concepts just don’t apply.

[Donald Hoffman @donalddhoffman]

"The stuff of the world is mind-stuff. ... The mind-stuff is not spread in space and time; these are part of the cyclic scheme deciphered by the mind-stuff".

Sir Arthur Eddington, The Nature of the Physical World, 1928.

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@No5mallf3at Broooooooo, truth is not a property, its just a linguistic convention for just uttering the proposition itself.

[꥟ ENTELECHEIA ꥟ @cyrnosofia]

"Logic discoveries are Syntethic"

"Nope, They're Analytic"

"What the heck are you saying? That was solved in Frege, have you read him? "

"No. Have you?"

"Me Neither"

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@Tim0riginal @worldviewdesign @cosmosarcive Completely ignoring his point. The point is that if you make this response, then the theist can say God’s moral actions need no obligation to make sense, thus either rendering the POE redundant or the response simply is inadequate.

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

Its not located anywhere, that concept only applies to Objects of Consciousness, not the Subject of Consciousness.

[The Scientific Lens @LensScientific]

Where do you think human consciousness is located?

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@PAHoyeck Just can’t help it bro😔

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@philosophymeme0 I don’t think Hegel is violating the law of non-contradiction, logical contradictions are abstract; while for Hegel, Dialectical Contradictions are living and preserved in a further unity—unity-in-difference here.

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@No5mallf3at @realpredicate Am i evil for recommending Science of Logic to a beginner who’s trying to learn Philosophy?

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@Neo_1dealism The Non-Relational Pill is too brutal💔

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@nonaliudisms Whats is the difference? Unless one takes Monism in the pejorative way where all differences are annulled but true Monism integrates multiplicity and unity.

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@aufgehenderRest As much as i love his work on Process and Reality, Bradley’s is more philosophically grounded from what i see, and i think a case can be made where you can sublate Whiteheads thought in terms of Relational Experience.

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@LonghornJoker Treating God as “something” is precisely what leads most atheist arguments to get off ground. “i just believe in one less God” is the precise case of this.

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@aufgehenderRest How do you reconcile the views of Bradley and Schelling? They seem to converge on a lot of things.

[that_miserable_guy @Dr_Miserable]

@JoshuaLWatson The more important question is whether the form of the good can contemplate me?