@Sad_And_Dead_@SylwiaToka43618@CaudilloXIV If the text meant "consensual solicitation," the law would use patah (seduction) not taphas (forceful seizure). Again forcing a marriage as a "civil" remedy for an assault is a human made patriarchal practice, not a standard for divine justice
@Sad_And_Dead_@SylwiaToka43618@CaudilloXIV The text describes a man seizing a woman and having sex with her against her will which is the literal meaning of taphas in this context then he is, by definition her attacker. Forcing a victim to marry the person who violated her is a patriarchal legal remedy not divine standard
@Sad_And_Dead_@SylwiaToka43618@CaudilloXIV If "rape" is an assault on a woman's sanctity, then forcing the victim to marry her attacker is an ongoing violation, not a solution. Your argument confirms this is an ancient flawed human legal code, not a divine moral standard
@Sad_And_Dead_@SylwiaToka43618@CaudilloXIV This is a human authored legal code, not divine command. A just God would never mandate forced marriage between victim and attacker. The Hebrew term taphas confirms it describes a violent seizure, which scholars correctly interpret as rape
@N2THEV0ID@MagneticNorse What about Christian grapers? Ig u guys lets them go around free and only care about someone religion more then the person commenting the crime itβs self. W ignorance
@bacc4revenge@Blissdemonx4ab@Darkyouniss@MarlonDaily u believe jesus AS is god but in ur own book itβs says god canβt change. if the infinite god changes his nature and became human then thatβs god changing. and no where in the bible does jesus (AS) ever claimed to be God. and before responding with the famous βi amβ serch up greek