Oleksandr Syrsky has finally been sacked as Commander-in-Chief (CiC), replaced with Mikhailo Drapaty. The western press and its Ukrainian subsidiaries are busy proclaiming that Syrsky’s ‘Soviet’ approach of high-casualty infantry assaults will now be replaced with Drapaty’s high-tech, newgen, insert buzzword warfare. But I thought Ukraine was already comfortably winning the war with 1:50 casualty rates, and Russian soldiers dying 20 minutes after deployment?
One can make the case that Drapaty is a more impressive military figure than Syrsky. But there are two more practical questions. Is it actually possible for Drapaty to change the army towards a more ‘humane’ and effective direction? Is he really conducting a ‘military revolution’, replacing Syrsky’s cadre with his own personnel? And what is the broader political impact of street protests forcing the president to change the Commander-in-Chief?
In terms of huge change, I’m skeptical. Syrsky was much-criticized most for his brutal assault units, but Drapaty will be forced to turn to similarly casualty-heavy offensive operations because of pressure to achieve results from Zelensky and the west. Besides, when the only recruits left are drug addicts and unhappy civilians, there’s little way to force them to die at the frontlines other than through violence. More importantly, Ukraine’s president and other top military figures are saying that mobilization needs to be massively increased to counteract a supposedly incoming Russian mass mobilization this autumn. Footage of forced mobilization continues flooding the internet, and the number of mobilization groups are apparently increasing.
Take this example from Lviv, for instance, on July 22:
In short, those dreaming of a bloodless war fought by robots are likely to be disappointed. Top figures in the army, including the ‘young generation of NATO-trained nationalists’, are quite explicit about this. Meanwhile, many nationalists in the army are enraged that limp-wristed civilian draft dodgers can transform the army by protesting, drawing dark and bloody historical analogies. More discipline is needed.
Full article in reply
It is no longer possible to suspend the disbelief required to think any of this (IAEA, UN, international law) has any bearing on the issues of our time.
Israel has been committing a genocide for almost three years.
The majority of Jewish Canadians support it.
Major Jewish orgs conflate the religion with the state.
Some non-Jewish Canadians are now taking their word for it.
This is a much more plausible explanation than DEI.
And call him the "White Chief"—the nickname Biletsky used for himself back when Azov was just getting started. You know the time when he praised Hitler, talked about a superior White race, crusaded against Jews, and made pogroms of Vietnamese migrants in Kharkiv.
Because nothing says "EU values" quite like having a neo-Nazi as Commander-in-Chief 🤣
Bravo, Fedorov—the progressive liberal who somehow turned political irony into performance art.
'Chequered past' is one way to put it
Poklad served 2.5 years for extortion and then became a prominent provincial gangster responsible for countless killings
“I’m a victim because people are mean to me because I openly support an entity that just killed over 20,000 children” is such a patently insane view and it’s only normalized through 1) repetition and 2) sectarianism (note it’s “as a Jewish student” not “as a supporter of Israel”)
🚨Прокопенко "Редіс" підтримав Ігоря Клименка, якого готують в імовірні наступники Михайла Федорова на чолі Міноборони України.
Водночас командир 1-го корпусу НГУ "Азов" віддав належне ексміністру Федорову.
Last known writing from Rosa Luxemburg coupled with some of Antonio Gramsci's prison writings tells a tragic story.
Rosa, the frenetic pseudo-religious prophet romanticizing spontaneity and defeat, and Gramsci who saw and understood it all but couldn't stop it.
For America "winning" looks like the last few decades of undisputed power over the entire planet, with consent and without complaint.
Claiming these recent reckless gangster moves with uncertain outcomes is "winning" makes you a worthless analyst.
Imagine looking at the Eurocommunist track record vs. Nazis, and the Bolshevik track record vs. Nazis, and *continuing to insist* that being a professional loser was "in hindsight" the right move.
I hate to bring this up again but there is a reason I can make this factual meme below. Chengdu builds high capacity, earthquake proof underground city center metro lines for $200 million per kilometer. Wage adjusted. When things cost less to build you tend to have more of it.