@juanplotssss@weirdantsu@Sirikamirori@Ilikecelestia Cultural critiques like Patrick W. Galbraith and yoshihiro yonezawa. Talks about it history history and the culture surronding it. With them stating the culture surrounds 2d complex.
@juanplotssss@weirdantsu@Sirikamirori@Ilikecelestia Talking about the sexology studies On F.S.M. I did not mention studies on lolicon. Since they are rare and very little. Lolicon is only looked at cultural critics. While F.S.M is looking at the whole of fictional content among all type. Including fictional rape and such.
@juanplotssss@weirdantsu@Sirikamirori@Ilikecelestia There are studys on F.S.M (fictional sexual material.) Yall are talking about fictional content. If anything yall should look at those studies about F.S.M. those studies has more to do with the content being talking.
@aCuteDoe@Sirikamirori They don't care if you like it or not. They just want to enjoy it. without people coming in telling them there nothing but disgusting monsters. They don't even want it to be mainstream. This whole fight over it first started with people calling the whole of anime pdf cartoons.
@aCuteDoe@Sirikamirori Your the first one I ever seen say lolicon is not the problem but the individual. Nothing wrong with that statement. you are right on that. it depends on the individual.
@zombiemagnate1@022o_ot4kou The attention is also focuse on the people consuming the art and not the people making it. Its a community that is very art base. Such a community lives or dies base on the artists. But going after the artists has proven fruitless. Along with them willing to back each other.
@narconazi67@022o_ot4kou If you can't say anything about it accept it gross your not hurting it. Just making it stronger and adding more people to there ranks. When it comes to alot of communities around porn. Negative attention helps them grow and secretly brings more in. Alot them where also anti-loli
@narconazi67@022o_ot4kou I watched dude doesn't really say anything. Just talking and not really saying anything. Just the simple "look how gross this person so gross."
@Mystiker1290@gotaxevaders Both design came during the same time. Bishoujo was used to describe them all. Saying like" love for the imaginary shoujo." Along with calling people lolicons for enjoying bishoujo. Even in invader lum.https://t.co/Fi7Y7HrzrL
@Mystiker1290@gotaxevaders Loli was around but wasn't used until late 1990s -2000s. Bishoujo was used to refer to all these characters that fit into lolicon. It is a board term and it is board on propose.
@Mystiker1290@gotaxevaders Moe wouldn't come around until 1990s but the first person to attach moe to a bishoujo character would be Hayasaka Miki with a character he made called Moe in 1980s. There was also Morino Usagi a lolicon mangaka with his puni-loli artstyle where the moe art style originated.
@Lootje_03 Mostly because age for a fictional character only has a simple use. Which the narrative can easily do without. Giving a fictional character a age end being outright irrelevant since people can simply tell by how the character acts in the story. Kanna a go example for this point
@Lootje_03@Roquefortsin No that just dumb. Who ever believe aging up character is also pedophilia has not actually thought about it and to heavily simplify things for a untrue belief.
@Mystiker1290@gotaxevaders Matter of fact yes. Uchiyama aki is know know as the king of lolicon. Do to how much he was drawing it. When going to look at the lolicon works he made in the 1980s you get alot of this. This is one of his works loli loli world.
@Mystiker1290@gotaxevaders That what I thought until I did more digging. One of the oldest running lolicon anthology books being bishoujo shoukougun. Its also called lolita syndrome in English text. 1980s-2000s. Even finding alot doujins and works with tall voluptuous characters using the word loli.