Olivia
Online
WassupG
@EAtkg9
still looking for
Joined December 2024
123 Following
240 Followers
59 Posts
Using the correct peer to peer yes without layers of middleman sucking value and energy operating like a centralized credit card processor layer 2. BTC is not Bitcoin.
Examination & Analysis Of The Craig Wright / Anonymous Speech Video...
4 years ago, you said Bitcoin would reach billions of tx/s before 2030.
People laughed. They called you a fraud.
Today, $BITCOIN SV has demonstrated 1M+ tx/s, with research pointing far beyond that.
@Dr_CSWright @CsTominaga , you said you would do it. And you’re delivering. Thank you for keeping your word.
https://t.co/bqz3EthAjU
Computer science is not dying. What is dying, rather deservedly, is the absurd idea that a university degree should amount to four years of expensive vocational training in whatever programming language happened to be fashionable when the syllabus committee last woke up.
Computer science is necessary because algorithmic thinking is necessary.
It teaches abstraction, decomposition, complexity, graph structures, recursion, state, optimisation, formal reasoning and the discipline of turning vague problems into precise procedures. Those skills become more valuable as AI improves, not less.
What becomes less valuable is memorising syntax that a machine can now generate before the lecturer has finished explaining the assignment.
Education therefore has to move with the tools.
Instead, universities are characteristically reactive. Industry changes, tools change, methods change, and several years later the curriculum committee bravely discovers that something has happened.
Students should already be learning how to specify problems for AI systems, interrogate generated code, verify algorithms, test assumptions, reason about architecture, identify failure modes and distinguish an elegant answer from an elegant mistake.
The machine can increasingly write the implementation.
That makes understanding the implementation more important.
Much of what people call “degree inflation” comes from confusing education with credentialled job preparation. We created degrees for occupations that once required apprenticeships, then filled those degrees with practical instruction, and finally wondered why graduates possessing certificates sometimes lacked intellectual depth.
Computer science should not produce somebody who “knows Python”.
A competent twelve-year-old can learn Python.
It should produce somebody who understands why one algorithm terminates, another explodes combinatorially, a third fails under concurrency, and a fourth produces the wrong answer while looking beautifully correct.
The future does not make computer science obsolete.
It merely makes mediocre computer-science education embarrassingly visible.
AI is not killing the discipline.
It is exposing how much of what we called the discipline was vocational training wearing academic robes.
Don’t forget about https://t.co/qAEGUMobug
Tonight this happened.
Every move you see from this robotic car was individually paid for with a real Bitcoin SV transaction.
100 satoshis per command,
verified by the robot itself in 81 milliseconds,
No bank,
No API key,
No account.
The payment IS the command.
Proof, forever, for anyone: each movement in the clip is one of these transactions. LEFT, RIGHT, FORWARD, BACK.
https://t.co/rYcbRjkXl2
https://t.co/s3beWTxNnQ
https://t.co/ntdZmgmPBu
https://t.co/XAMuMazcDy
Built on BRC-105, the 402 payment standard. Raspberry Pi 5, one evening of work with my AI doing the heavy lifting, and the entire night of testing cost about 3 cents in fees. Machines that sell their services directly are not coming. They are here, on my kitchen table.
Now tell me which other blockchain can do that?
#BSV
#MachineEconomy
CULT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN
[Coinbase: “btc”]
A financial analyst’s report
by John Pitts
Don’t forget!
Jeffrey Epstein’s pal Judge Rheinhardt tried in vain to cancel Dr Craig Wright’s defense in the Kleiman vs Wright court before it started. He decided to judge the case against Wright before evened was argued in a fair court. His decision was reversed when further evidence was submitted. (read the tweet highlighted below)
Don’t forget, COPA is made up of people and entitities which took seed money from Jeffrey Epstein and visited Little Saint James Island.
Funny how Jeffery Epstein always shows up behind the kids who are tormenting one man (whom they claim is a clown to ignore but they never actually ignore— but fight with all their might and financial backing they’ll can muster).
Think about what you’re supporting, and ask more questions about who they associate with.
btc was created by liars cheats and pedos, for liars cheats and pedos— look into it. The bad connections are public and very strong now.
Feel free to send this to pals who own btc simply bc it was trendy/trending when they bought it, but don’t know much about it.
Coinbase is a member of COPA and lists Fartcoin and CumRocket but not real Bitcoin [ @orangegatewayx: “BSV”]. They also routinely give money to Brink to channel to btc’s Core Developers, who make changes like Taproot to the btc system under the approval of Coinbase while firing anyone (like @LukeDashjr ) who opposes their wishes.
Think about why— follow the money.
Lightning Networks are not decentralized— they’re fiefdoms, each channel with its own “trusted third party”— exactly the problem that Satoshi drew-up Bitcoin to END (it’s in the first paragraph of his white paper).
That is one of the more interesting second-order effects that almost nobody in the BTC community seems willing to discuss.
The narrative assumes that a falling BTC price somehow makes the system more accessible. But transaction costs are not denominated in dollars. They are denominated in block space. The user experiences them in dollars only after conversion.
Imagine BTC falls from $100,000 to $40,000. A person holding $50 worth of BTC does not suddenly become wealthier relative to transaction costs. If network congestion remains, or worsens because people are rushing to exit, the proportion of their holdings consumed by fees can actually increase.
The result is a growing class of economically stranded outputs.
At the height of a speculative boom, people accumulate tiny balances because they believe future appreciation will rescue them. During a decline, reality intrudes. They discover they own $10, $20, or $50 worth of BTC that costs a substantial fraction of that amount to move.
Then comes the institutional layer.
If ETFs, funds, leveraged holders, and other large players begin liquidating, transaction demand rises precisely when confidence falls. The people most desperate to move funds are competing for the same limited block space.
That creates a perverse dynamic:
Price ↓
Confidence ↓
Exit demand ↑
Competition for settlement ↑
Effective cost of settlement ↑
Small holders become trapped ↑
Economic utility ↓
Confidence ↓ again
The irony is extraordinary.
In most markets, a falling price makes participation easier. A falling house price makes houses more affordable. A falling commodity price makes the commodity cheaper to consume.
A falling BTC price can make ownership less useful because the asset's utility is constrained by a fixed settlement capacity.
The network does not become more capable when the price falls. It remains exactly as constrained as before.
So as the speculative premium disappears, people are increasingly forced to evaluate the system on utility rather than narrative.
That is where things become uncomfortable.
A system capable of processing millions of transactions per second becomes more valuable as adoption grows because capacity supports demand.
A system constrained to a handful of transactions per second becomes less valuable as adoption grows because demand overwhelms capacity.
The most fascinating possibility is that a prolonged decline creates not merely a wealth destruction event, but a usability destruction event. As price falls, more balances become uneconomic to move. More users become trapped. More activity migrates elsewhere.
At that point the question stops being, "What is BTC worth?"
It becomes, "How much of BTC can actually be used?"
Those are not the same question, and eventually markets notice the difference.
Fact: Michael isn’t going to tell you he sold until after you bought his coins.
$BTC
For years, we have been invited to admire architectural drawings of palaces that were never built. We were shown sketches of splendid cities suspended in the air and assured that gravity was merely a temporary inconvenience.
Ethereum promised a world of applications that would transform commerce, identity, gaming, finance, ownership, and human cooperation itself. BTC promised a revolution in money that somehow required every useful feature to be removed in the name of progress. Both became masters of anticipation. The future was always arriving tomorrow, and tomorrow developed a remarkable talent for never becoming today.
My ambition is considerably less fashionable.
I intend to take every significant idea that was promised and not delivered, every application declared inevitable but somehow perpetually unavailable, every system that remained trapped inside a white paper, conference presentation, roadmap, or venture capital pitch deck, and turn it into something that actually exists.
Not theories. Not aspirations. Not demonstrations designed for applause.
Code.
Working examples.
Documentation.
Libraries.
Systems that developers can examine, test, extend, improve, and build upon.
The modern age suffers from an excess of visionaries and a shortage of builders. It has produced countless prophets of the future who appear strangely allergic to construction. We have become accustomed to celebrating intentions while quietly excusing results.
I prefer a different standard.
If an idea is worthwhile, it should be implemented. If it can be implemented, it should be documented. If it is documented, it should be placed in the hands of those capable of creating something greater.
The highest compliment one can pay an invention is not admiration. It is use.
My objective is therefore simple: to place into your hands the tools that others promised, so that you may go out and build the future they merely described.
@CsTominaga Awesome
This month I will be releasing the systems I have been building.
Not a token. Not another wallet. Not another "Web3" toy.
A complete banking framework integrated with Bitcoin.
A Bitcoin-enabled SQL database where transactions, records, contracts, invoices, and audit trails are natively tied to the blockchain.
A financial management platform that operates more like Quicken than a cryptocurrency wallet, allowing individuals and enterprises to manage accounts, assets, invoices, contracts, and records within a single system.
Every payment uses deterministic single-use addresses derived through ECDH key exchange. No address reuse. No public identity leakage. Parties can regenerate payment information when authorised, while outside observers see only ordinary transactions.
The architecture is built around master keys, derived subkeys, transaction chains, and hash-key chains, creating a single cryptographic source of truth.
In addition, I will be releasing a digital asset system that supports true transfer of ownership.
When Alice transfers a document or digital asset to Bob, the system is designed so ownership can move rather than merely be copied. The objective is to provide cryptographic evidence that Alice no longer retains access after transfer, creating a form of digital possession that more closely resembles physical property.
These releases are prototypes and will require substantial work before reaching enterprise-grade deployment, but the foundations are now complete.
For years people have talked about what Bitcoin might become.
I intend to show what can actually be built.
The irony here is thick.
BTC changed:
• block policy,
• fee market dynamics,
• transaction structure,
• relay behaviour,
• scaling direction,
• and increasingly relies on custodial/L2 abstractions…
yet maxis call that “organic evolution.”
But when BSV engineers optimize infrastructure for higher throughput and legacy node software can’t keep up temporarily, suddenly:
“THAT’S NOT BITCOIN.”
So apparently:
changing economic behavior = fine,
changing architecture = fine,
moving activity off-chain = fine,
rewriting transaction semantics = fine,
but improving throughput beyond old node limitations is where “Bitcoin purity” begins.
That’s not a technical standard.
That’s narrative gatekeeping.
And the “trusted third party” argument is constantly abused.
The whitepaper removes the need for trusted intermediaries in transaction validation and double-spend resolution through PoW consensus.
It does NOT say:
“Every node on earth must process identical workloads forever regardless of hardware specialization or network evolution.”
The internet itself scales through specialization:
• routers,
• CDNs,
• data centers,
• backbone providers,
• edge services.
Bitcoin scaling economically through specialized infrastructure does not automatically invalidate peer-to-peer settlement any more than AWS invalidates TCP/IP.
The real debate is not:
“Did Bitcoin evolve?”
Obviously it did.
The debate is:
Which changes preserved the whitepaper’s intended economic behaviour
and which transformed Bitcoin from transactional cash infrastructure into predominantly speculative settlement collateral.
Get the BSV Network Intel Report every morning at 6:15 Central Time: chain health, capital flows, mining distribution, TPS.
It's free. Just hit /subscribe when you open the bot.
🤖 https://t.co/xbbndwPwsa
Today's report → https://t.co/O5KF5VJNuj
If it's useful, there's a contribution address at the top of each report. Sats welcome, never required.
The IPv6 Forum's Call
Why the formal call for IPv6-only transition matters for the architecture being assembled
By MrBen
In May 2026, Professor Latif Ladid, founder and President of the IPv6 Forum, published a position paper titled "Call for IPv6-Only and Blockchain on Agentic AI." It is a formal call from the global authority on IPv6 standards for worldwide transition to IPv6-only networks, and it names BSV blockchain as the trust and economy layer for the Internet of Agents.
This paper deserves attention not because BSV is named, which those who know Ladid's work will not find surprising, but because the IPv6 Forum is making a formal institutional call at a specific moment. That moment is the same moment the rest of this sequence has been documenting. The architecture is reaching the point where formal calls to action are being issued by the standards-setting bodies.
The IPv6 Forum and what it does.
The IPv6 Forum is the international body that has been advocating for IPv6 adoption since 1999. It works with governments, standards bodies, network operators, and equipment vendors to coordinate the global transition from IPv4 to IPv6. Ladid has led the forum throughout its existence and is one of the senior figures in global networking infrastructure.
When the IPv6 Forum issues a formal call for action, it is not commentary. It is policy direction from the body that coordinates IPv6 deployment globally. The forum's calls have historically preceded national IPv6 mandates, enterprise deployment programmes, and standards body decisions.
Ladid's current call is for a worldwide full transition to IPv6-only for enterprise and government networks. The paper notes that the big countries are now crossing 60 percent IPv6 penetration, with six countries above 70 percent. France at 86 percent, China at 77 percent, Germany at 76 percent, Belgium at 72 percent, India at 70 percent. Dual-stack deployment is described as a temporary compromise that creates ongoing expense and operational complexity. IPv6-only is described as the production-ready vision for AI, 6G, Blockchain, peer-to-peer IoT, and enterprise verticals.
Why IPv6-only matters for Agentic AI.
The paper makes a specific architectural argument about why IPv6-only is required for Agentic AI at scale.
Ladid forecasts approximately 900 billion AI agents by the end of the decade. Every agent needs a globally routable address. IPv4 cannot provide that. Network address translation, which is how IPv4 currently handles the address shortage, breaks the end-to-end connectivity that direct agent-to-agent communication requires.
With IPv6, every agent, sensor, container, and device can have a unique globally routable address. Agents can discover each other directly. They can establish peer-to-peer connections without traversing centralised gateways. Service discovery becomes capability-based rather than location-based. An agent can query the network for an agent that can analyse financial risk in Spanish and receive the IPv6 address of a qualified peer.
Without IPv6-only, the machine economy that the agent commerce literature describes cannot operate at scale. The networking layer is the constraint.
https://t.co/TJIk1c0B6n
1 of 3
@Grayscale BSV only🔥
BSV Association Just Had High-Level Meetings with the U.S. SEC on the CLARITY Act — This Is Massive⚡
On May 11, 2026, a senior delegation from the BSV Association held high-level meetings in Washington with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The delegation included top-tier experts:
- Connor Murray (CEO, BSV Association)
- Alexander Mann (Head of Industry)
- Jeffrey Golden KC – legendary lawyer and primary author of the ISDA Master Agreement
- Howard Schweitzer (Cozen O’Connor) – former Acting President of the U.S. Export-Import Bank
The central topic? The CLARITY Act** — landmark legislation currently moving through the U.S. Senate that aims to clearly distinguish digital commodities from securities and create a proper regulatory framework for stablecoins and digital assets.
This is not a random meeting. This is strategic, professional engagement at the exact moment when U.S. regulators are shaping the future of the entire industry.
Why is this extremely bullish for Real Bitcoin (SV)?
Because BSV was designed from day one as a digital commodity** — decentralized, utility-first, with massive on-chain capacity and true peer-to-peer electronic cash. It aligns perfectly with the spirit and likely requirements of the CLARITY Act.
While other projects struggle with securities classification issues, Real Bitcoin (SV) is positioned as one of the cleanest and strongest candidates for clear commodity status.
This meeting, combined with BSV’s rapid technical progress (Teranode at 1.1M+ TPS, working stablecoins, BSVM, enterprise solutions), suggests that institutional and regulatory acceptance could arrive faster than most expect.
Real Bitcoin (SV) is not waiting for permission.
It is building the infrastructure — and simultaneously preparing the regulatory groundwork.
The gap between where BSV is today and where the market will eventually value it is closing.
The pieces are falling into place at the highest levels.
The awakening is accelerating.**
The storm is coming.💥
Sources:
• D2 Legal Technology (D2LT) Official LinkedIn Post – May 2026
• BSV Association delegation meeting with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission – Washington D.C., May 11, 2026
• CLARITY Act – ongoing legislative developments in the U.S. Senate (May 2026)
• Jeffrey Golden KC, Senior Adviser at D2 Legal Technology and primary author of the ISDA Master Agreement
#RealBitcoin #BitcoinSV #BSV #CLARITYAct #SEC #RegulatoryClarity #InstitutionalAdoption #DigitalAssets #SatoshiVision #Commodity
If you worked on BSV and you've got a small business or a startup today,
I want you to be one of the first to use something I've built 👀 - not payment related, though.
Closed beta starts this Friday.
Free for a month.
DM me.
If you've ever used HandCash help me with a RT🙏
@apagut LFG 🔥
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
113.9M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.6M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.7M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.7M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.6M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.1M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
72.8M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.7M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
65.8M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.8M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers