@EEEEEssssEEE2@GooberTheGreat8@Orthodoxyiscool Monarchies are not inherently hereditary, this is a feature of modern liberals masking as monarchists, usually from an appeal to stability. There are many different types.
??? Do the common people not create the culture, tradition, and living being of the state? If so, then the state is the expressed will of such a mass. If not so, then what is the state if not an expression of a nation's existence?
@GooberTheGreat8@vulpehostilius@Orthodoxyiscool "The expressed will of the state" is a meaningless egalitarian philosophist folly.
Each and every relation proper to traditional society and modern economies rest on relations of subjection and direction.
@vulpehostilius@GooberTheGreat8@Orthodoxyiscool And, by any measure, how can you even begin to expect a hereditary system of order to confidently run an administration? Without alienating themselves from their own people given the time?
@vulpehostilius@GooberTheGreat8@Orthodoxyiscool Petite bourgeois, you mean? And much of those freedmen that did exist were still inhibited from various activities, and it was unbelievably difficult to ascend the social ladder, even if they had some ounce of merit within them.
How many times does this have to happen? The French Revolution was a bourgeois revolution! Yes I get it the Jacobins were cool as fuck and that is very agreeable but....still bourgeoisie!!!!