@PackersRunNFC@NflOutdated Vikes have a top 2 defense in the league. Top 3 at worst. Offensively maybe more talent on 2 of those 3 teams but you clearly haven��t been watching the games if you think overall they are more ‘talented’ than the Vikings. It’ll be Bears 1st, Vikes #2, and who cares about 3 and 4
@run_bull_ I’ve never put any stock in it. The ratings are subjective and a waste of time. I think looking at Turner’s rating last week was the nail in the coffin. He played like a DPOY candidate but you’d never think that by looking at the PFF rating.
@PaulCharchian The season he got injured he was arguably the best QB in the division and top 5 in the league. We started slow that year and he and the Vikes were absolutely hitting their stride. I’ll never understand the Kirk haters and there’s no changing their minds.
@PatSieps Should be a good game. Bears have no defense but a scary offense. Vikes usually take a few games to become dominant on defense but need a big showing on Sunday. Offense can’t sputter to start.
@MattAnderson_8 Love this! He was catching heat for not producing immediately. Banks hopefully will be the same way, but preferably sooner than 3 years obviously . Big Citrus, too! Better late than never regardless
@Baller_Report The argument was the worst team of all time. Raises their overall by 3%. and you conveniently left off my secondary note about the last 5 years, 2 WCF’s, a divisional round loss with a hobbled Ant and no Donte. Blah, blah, blah. Long story short. Wolves > Lakers
@SleeperNuggets Thunder aren’t winning the west this year. Probably the Spurs. Thunder next. Wolves right where they will finish and maybe better if they can gel early. If…