SWB

@EPWR_SWB

O Progressismo é uma doença. O Trilema de Žižek (com o trio inteligência, esquerda e honestidade) é um axioma. Ron Paul / Thomas Massie: decência na Política.

Lisboa

Joined October 2023

297 Following

53 Followers

5.6K Posts

EPWR_SWB retweeted

Benjamin Kaiser

@KaiserBenKaiser

about 9 hours ago

Es gibt keinen Ewigkeitsanspruch für Kulturen. Verschwindet ein Volk, verschwindet auch die aus diesem Volk hervorgegangene Kultur. Verschwinden die Franzosen, die Deutschen oder die Italiener, da demographisch die Zuwanderer die Mehrheit bilden und sich deswegen nicht mehr in die Kultur des Gastvolkes integrieren, verschwindet das Abendland, wie es über Jahrhunderte hinweg gewachsen ist. Dies heißt, dass auch das Verständnis für die Architektur, die Literatur und die Musik des Abendlandes verschwindet, da kein Volk mehr da ist, das diese Tradition fortleben. Jean Raspail beschreibt dies im „Heerlager der Heiligen“: „Sie werden müde sein, Hunger haben und mit Ihrer schönen Eichentür Feuer machen. Sie werden auf Ihre Terrasse kacken und sich mit den Büchern Ihrer Bibliothek die Hände reinigen. [...] Das Schöne wird nicht mehr schön sein, das Nützliche wird lächerlich und das Unnütze absurd werden.“ Es wird also das, was Europa einstmals war, hinweggefegt werden und einem Vielvölkergemisch weichen, das nicht in der Lage sein wird, eine nennenswerte eigene kulturelle Tradition zu entwickeln, da es außer dem islamischen Dominanzanspruch über keinen eigenen Impuls verfügt, der über die Vernutzung der alten Strukturen hinausgeht. Video: Paris, Mai 2026

161

507

58K

EPWR_SWB retweeted

Ihsan Horani

@neutralground90

about 17 hours ago

Germany's intelligence chief just warned a closed Bundestag meeting. The Muslim Brotherhood is infiltrating German political institutions. Strategic. Patient. Non-violent. Building relationships, influencing legislation, embedding through civic organisations funded by German taxpayers. His most alarming finding: left-wing parties are the most vulnerable. The SPD. The Greens. The Left Party. "More open and susceptible" due to what he called "a poorly understood concept of tolerance." A German political scientist confirmed it in blunter terms. Left-wing allies "possess no argumentative resistance to the Brotherhood. They are discursively co-opted and subordinate themselves." The Brotherhood does not confront the left. It cultivates it. https://t.co/Q7FvFpeF8f

446

97K

EPWR_SWB retweeted

Shadow of Ezra

@ShadowofEzra

1 day ago

BREAKING: Benjamin Netanyahu says he will not comply with President Trump’s peace deal with Iran and will strike Iran and Lebanon whenever he deems necessary. Netanyahu says he does not see eye to eye with Trump on the issue and that he is responsible for Israel’s security. Nethanyahu needs to be removed.

37K

12K

EPWR_SWB retweeted

Handre

@Handre

about 15 hours ago

In 1968, while teenage Red Guards beat their professors to death with clubs in Beijing courtyards, Jean-Paul Sartre sat in Paris calling Mao's Cultural Revolution a model of revolutionary democracy. The most celebrated intellectual in France looked at a country burning its own libraries and saw liberation. He sold the Maoist newspaper La Cause du Peuple on French street corners himself, holding it aloft like a sacrament. Consider what he was endorsing. Between 1966 and 1976, the Cultural Revolution killed somewhere between 500,000 and two million people. Schools shut down across the entire country. Students dragged teachers onto stages, hung placards around their necks, forced them to kneel on broken glass, then murdered them. The historian Bian Zhongyun, vice-principal of a girls' school in Beijing, died on August 5, 1966, beaten by her own students with nail-studded clubs. Sartre called this the people governing themselves. You should understand why a man this intelligent got it this wrong. Sartre believed knowledge served power, that truth was whatever the revolution required, that the individual existed to be dissolved into the collective will. So when Mao abolished the distinction between teacher and student, between expert and mob, Sartre cheered. He had spent decades arguing that bourgeois reason was a class weapon. Here was a regime taking him at his word and clubbing the reasoners to death. This is what economic illiteracy buys you. A university, a price, a contract, and a peasant's grain stockpile all carry knowledge that no central planner can seize or replicate. Mises explained the calculation problem in 1920. Hayek explained dispersed knowledge in 1945. Sartre had access to both and chose the dunce cap of the collective instead, then handed out its propaganda on the Rue de Rennes. He died in 1980, mourned by 50,000 followers, never having retracted a word about Mao. The professors of Beijing got no such funeral. They got a ditch, and a philosopher in Paris explaining that their murder was freedom.

Handre's tweet photo. In 1968, while teenage Red Guards beat their professors to death with clubs in Beijing courtyards, Jean-Paul Sartre sat in Paris calling Mao's Cultural Revolution a model of revolutionary democracy. The most celebrated intellectual in France looked at a country burning its own libraries and saw liberation. He sold the Maoist newspaper La Cause du Peuple on French street corners himself, holding it aloft like a sacrament.

Consider what he was endorsing. Between 1966 and 1976, the Cultural Revolution killed somewhere between 500,000 and two million people. Schools shut down across the entire country. Students dragged teachers onto stages, hung placards around their necks, forced them to kneel on broken glass, then murdered them. The historian Bian Zhongyun, vice-principal of a girls' school in Beijing, died on August 5, 1966, beaten by her own students with nail-studded clubs. Sartre called this the people governing themselves.

You should understand why a man this intelligent got it this wrong. Sartre believed knowledge served power, that truth was whatever the revolution required, that the individual existed to be dissolved into the collective will. So when Mao abolished the distinction between teacher and student, between expert and mob, Sartre cheered. He had spent decades arguing that bourgeois reason was a class weapon. Here was a regime taking him at his word and clubbing the reasoners to death.

This is what economic illiteracy buys you. A university, a price, a contract, and a peasant's grain stockpile all carry knowledge that no central planner can seize or replicate. Mises explained the calculation problem in 1920. Hayek explained dispersed knowledge in 1945. Sartre had access to both and chose the dunce cap of the collective instead, then handed out its propaganda on the Rue de Rennes.

He died in 1980, mourned by 50,000 followers, never having retracted a word about Mao. The professors of Beijing got no such funeral. They got a ditch, and a philosopher in Paris explaining that their murder was freedom.

365

225K

SWB

@EPWR_SWB

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users