ETxcvb

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@KonstantinKisin Don’t generalize. I never accepted those accusations, neither had any adequate person. Lefties do accept that, so let them cry and pull their left hair. There is no need in conversation about that - don’t bend to left propaganda.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@StanleyRoberts @zoox Autonomous vehicles have to be equipped with machine guns at least. Anyone interfering should be quickly killed so vehicle could be on its autonomous way in no time at all. That’s what the future should look like. Plus, SF will lose all drug addicts and hobos really quickly.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@ianbremmer Don’t start doing what you are not capable of. Stick to simple stuff, thinking isn’t yours.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@YourAnonOne What about taking off his shirt and using it to push air - it woul work, no doubt.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@EricinAmericaX @WhiteHouse No matter what happens, the only thing you have in your screwed up brain leftovers is hating Trump. This is sad…

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@spencerschiff_ Nobody has it yet. If the goal is to make xAi and Elon look bad, find some other topic.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@r0ck3t23 No one can totally destroy anything in this field. Penrose has very nice hypotheses that were not confirmed yet. And no one knows what consciousness is anyway. But if the goal is the number of clicks (I hoped not), go on.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@XFreeze BS! I asked multiple times, none of them was high confidence Feb 28th.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@r0ck3t23 I am curious - why whining all the time?

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@GovBobFerguson Yep, fine those who work and embolden those who don’t. That’s the path to socialism and society collapse. Good job!

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

We are getting closer to ASI and singularity. Some professions are getting obsolete. Although I hate it, the temporary measure to keep society functioning is to introduce heavy taxation on AI usage, which should contribute to some form of universal income.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@karpathy @N8Programs That’s really weird to count on gradient descent finding solution in a highly nonlinear non convex landscape. LLMs are so far from global optimum… One needs real optimization to get anything good, and gradient descent is not going to find even simple phase transition.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

Absence of the physics laws, and in general world model, make LLMs unable to distinguish right from wrong. Until it’s there, they cannot even help with full automation, and AGI is out of reach. Some filters might help, but they cannot cover all edge cases.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@r0ck3t23 And no one is Einstein AND Michelangelo.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@r0ck3t23 Disagree. Even among humans there is specialization: not everyone is Einstein or Michelangelo. Some are really good carpenters. If to use human brain as blueprint, at least need to pay attention to that.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@haider1 The thing is people whose work is language manipulation will lose their job first. Evolution worked bottom-top, human replacement seems to be working top-bottom. It’s ironic that whoever invented LLMs, agents and claws will be replaced first. Proletariat is safe for now.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@realBigBrainAI The most probable way for the machines to reach AGI is to let them evolve in the real world. Humans need to supply them with initial goals, and let the evolution do the rest. Unfortunately for humans, if things go right, humans will become obsolete really quickly.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@r0ck3t23 Yes, interesting thought experiment. Maybe the solution can come from quantum mechanics: who is the observer and what’s his/her role? Does it matter if observer is human or not? Good stuff to think about…

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

I think current AI architecture is too primitive, limiting the progress. It’s time for something less linear: probably two forest-like structures, connected by hidden branches, with roots for the input and output.

[ETxcvb @ETxcvb]

@Tartarian14 There is some progress, related to entanglement and decoherence. Not everything resolved, but definitely a step forward.