Previously falsely accused, and fought back with evidence. Account created to set record straight and to counter/discuss misinformation on other similar cases.
Case against Eleanor de Freitas was strong, says Alison Saunders, director of public prosecutions:
“This evidence included text messages and CCTV footage that directly contradicted the account Ms De Freitas gave to the police."
[Old news, but part of the public record, if anyone is researching this case].
https://t.co/TUUEnmNCB4
She knows about the facts of the case very well. Her partner is Harriet Wistrich - David de Freitas lawyer. But for some reason, she wishes to keeping spreading misinformation (even in 2026), hence my recent post. Unfortunately there is no way to have any meaningful dialogue - and today it seems she has lost the plot! (I had originally only posted to my 70 or so followers without including her handle)
Journalist and self-styled 'feminist' Julie Bindel reveals her true colours: A few months ago I emailed Ms Bindel politely requesting an edit to one of her social media posts, which concerned misinformation about my case. (I'm used to this type of response from hardline activists, but was surprised to receive such a response from a mainstream journalist). My email and her response can be seen in the link below. https://t.co/7g7BtI141Y
I posted on a Facebook group about my book Misandry: The War on Men Uncovered. Talked about the mental health crisis men face, family court bias, false allegations. Nothing angry. Nothing attacking anyone.
The post is going viral, thousands of reactions and hundreds of comments. Some good, some very very bad.
Here's a sample of what's in those comments.
'Fun fact it's not a real thing.'
'There is no war on men. But thanks for adding to the incel community.'
'Awww poor ickle man babies.'
'Are you those kind of men who are beaten up by your wives and need protection by the state?'
This is what happens the moment you say men's issues deserve to be taken seriously. Mockery. Denial. Open contempt for actual survivors.
I'm making a full YouTube video breaking this down next week, the responses, the pattern, what it actually reveals. Because if this is the reaction to a book about facts and lived experience, that tells you everything about why men stay silent in the first place.
More on this, and everything else I write about: https://t.co/Ub6zon5U0L
#misandry
And just to clarify further: The Crown Prosecution Service took over the case against Eleanor de Freitas on 5th December 2013, and continued with the prosecution. When Ms de Freitas died, on April 4th 2014 (some four months after the CPS had taken over the case) her father sought to blame the CPS and myself for her death, at her inquest. The coroner refused to make such a finding. Mr de Freitas then took the coroner to court, to open a new inquest, (via Judicial Review) and lost. (see link below).
On 9th March 2016, Mr Justice Holroyde, sitting in the High Court, after reviewing all of the papers, denied the application for judicial review. In his reasons, he stated at paragraph 5:
“…The CPS here had medical evidence, including that which was relied on by those representing the deceased [the de Freitas family], which did not identify any real of immediate risk to her life. No representations were made to the CPS, in the days immediately proceeding her death, to the effect that her condition was worsening and that the prosecution was endangering life”.
https://t.co/XqEvH9iGCe
It is right to acknowledge that Ms de Freitas was a tragic victim of suicide, the product of serious mental health conditions. But she was not a victim of rape. Nor is it correct to suggest that the prosecution was responsible for driving her to her death. https://t.co/TazHJgwzOs
@soulfoodie Prosecutors have defended pursuing a woman who killed herself days before appearing in court accused of making a false rape allegation. https://t.co/v0WPBCm3Nf
@bindelj Judge accepts defendant was not trying to intimidate David de Freitas, whose daughter Eleanor killed herself before trial for alleged false rape claim
https://t.co/IvoKeAYJb9
@bindelj It is right to acknowledge that Ms de Freitas was a tragic victim of suicide, the product of serious mental health conditions. But she was not a victim of rape. Nor is it correct to suggest that the prosecution was responsible for driving her to her death.
[Old news, but part of the record on Eleanor de Freitas case and police misconduct.]
An internal Metropolitan Police report, seen by The Mail on Sunday, states that Detective Inspector Julian King and Detective Constable Phil Dial failed to follow the most basic leads and left Mr Economou to gather evidence himself to show that the rape claim was false.
The report says officers failed to collect CCTV images showing the pair kissing in a lingerie store after the alleged assault. They neglected to check thousands of texts, too.
The report states that when Mr Economou alleged that Ms de Freitas had perverted the course of justice, officers told him ‘to go away and obtain the evidence before police would be willing to record the allegation, whereas the correct position should have been to record the allegation in order that it could be investigated’.
https://t.co/smGr2qgP4k
@bindelj The reality is, I wish to live my life in peace, without yourself spreading misinformation about this case, which is ongoing (even in 2026). For context, the full email to and from Ms Bindel can be read here which is asking her to edit a social media post: https://t.co/gLpmW43nG8
@MuskFucksTrump@nathancofnas My nightmare 7-year ordeal with false accusers Eleanor & David de Freitas, in one easy to read blog post.
https://t.co/OSnC7iFCq9
@MuskFucksTrump@ConradOliveira@nathancofnas Case against Eleanor de Freitas was strong, says Alison Saunders, director of public prosecutions, defending CPS
https://t.co/9lPomkKeVA