Reminder that @CashApp is financially exploiting users.
Tight repayment schedule of one month + an economy full of struggling people + misleading advertising "Up to $500*", the asterisk means nothing to a reasonable user. UDAAP - look it up
#cashapp
@Dexerto@japan is fucking greedy and stupid
Ice in your drink takes up more volume, meaning less soda. When it melts, you have watered down sugar water.
@LLMJunky The fact is these classifiers are bypassed by context. It’s a known vulnerability in AI models. You cannot definitively fix or begin to address it, because you can use language that’s not blocked. This is the reality of these software restrictions based on context.
@noor36758@CodeWithAmann Oh I’m sorry didn’t realize giving a shit about quality was a bad thing. Funny how idiots like y’all cry when a company makes something low quality and you get burned, but you end up on the other end and suddenly it’s ok?
@jefray2105@domL0L@SnesusChrist@ash_twtz@VikasAlwys That’s where the value in it is: the creativity. Not the original thought, they’re paying for the product and the creativity behind it. You can’t claim credit for the creativity behind the creation of a product if your only part was “the original idea”
@jefray2105@domL0L@SnesusChrist@ash_twtz@VikasAlwys What creativity? You’re just describing. That’s like someone telling a web designer “I want it to be modern in appearance”
That’s… not your designing work, it’s the design work of the web designer. You just told it what you want, you didn’t put creativity into the product.
@jefray2105@SnesusChrist@ash_twtz@VikasAlwys Yes. No effort. If you are typing into a prompt, that's not labor for the product, that's simply telling your general idea, that's not the same as creating what that looks like or being able to bring the imaginative idea to reality, visually.
@jefray2105@domL0L@SnesusChrist@ash_twtz@VikasAlwys And AI doesn't have creativity
It's just mashing existing shit together, you're not an artist, you're just slapping your name on output. So yes, no effort.
@jefray2105@SnesusChrist@ash_twtz@VikasAlwys No one was saying this about digital art, fucknuts. Human created digital art didn't steal opportunity from artists like artificially created art. Big difference.
@ash_twtz@VikasAlwys You AI content creators are defrauding people by having them pay for the labor and skills you simply don't possess, but are passing it off as though you do to get paid by people who can't tell the difference. That's the real reason you're against watermarks.
@ash_twtz@VikasAlwys The creator is the model. You did nothing. You’re not an artist. If you spent time drawing something, you wouldn’t want anyone stealing it, so why do you want to take credit for work you didn’t do? Con artist traits maximum extraction with little to no effort
@ash_twtz Why would you be against something that draws a line of accountability? You can’t have “perfect image generation” and no safeguards to avoid fabrication of evidence with it. Can’t have both
Either images are slop or there is a watermark.