@BlackRock blackrock digital assets is packed with degenerates who don't even care to double-check "research they put out" and are actively robbing pensioners
@andrewmccalip YOU DONT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND? THIS IS NOT A PURE LLM! IT IS A NEUROSYMBOLIC HYBRID ARCHITECTURE. PREDICTING THE NEXT TOKEN CANNOT GET A NEURAL NETWORK TO DO CAD. AUTOREGRESSIVE TRANSFORMERS CANNOT ACHIEVE THIS, IT NEEDS A NON-GENERATIVE WORLD MODEL (grep and context compaction)
@DanishMFA how come you use legal style (very poorly, but anyway) when they arrest protesters thousands of miles away in a country you barely have any connection with, but you send a black and white sans-serif plaintext when a superpower threatens to take away your land and citizens
Is it a smaller LLM? No, but actually, yes. It's not an LLM, but it's almost certainly grown from one. The reward model in RLHF is a transformer with the LM head chopped off and a scalar head bolted on. Their system is probably this but generalized. Many heads, typed answer spaces, calibrated distributions instead of a raw scalar, and trained as the product rather than as a training-time side tool.
- Pareto-frontier intelligence almost certainly comes from distillation.
- Output tokens are free because there are no output tokens. The "output" is a softmax per question, essentially zero compute.
- Input at $0.042/MTok is small-model prefill pricing. Prefill is compute-bound, batched matrix-matrix work at near-peak GPU utilization. Autoregressive decoding is memory-bandwidth-bound and sequential. If you only ever prefill, you're using the hardware the way it wants to be used, which is what "hardware-aware parallel sampler" means.
- 70–500ms latency is one forward pass over a few hundred to few thousand tokens plus the network hop. Nothing else fits that window.
- Cardinality capped at 255 is a uint8. The answer index is literally a byte. Above that they score candidates independently and then pick, which is what you'd do if the head can only address 255 options at once.
- "Mathematically can't make type errors" just means the output layer is defined over the schema. There's no string to parse because there's no string.
Is it a smaller LLM? No, but actually, yes. It's not an LLM, but it's almost certainly grown from one. The reward model in RLHF is a transformer with the LM head chopped off and a scalar head bolted on. Their system is probably this but generalized. Many heads, typed answer spaces, calibrated distributions instead of a raw scalar, and trained as the product rather than as a training-time side tool.
- Pareto-frontier intelligence almost certainly comes from distillation.
- Output tokens are free because there are no output tokens. The "output" is a softmax per question, essentially zero compute.
- Input at $0.042/MTok is small-model prefill pricing. Prefill is compute-bound, batched matrix-matrix work at near-peak GPU utilization. Autoregressive decoding is memory-bandwidth-bound and sequential. If you only ever prefill, you're using the hardware the way it wants to be used, which is what "hardware-aware parallel sampler" means.
- 70–500ms latency is one forward pass over a few hundred to few thousand tokens plus the network hop. Nothing else fits that window.
- Cardinality capped at 255 is a uint8. The answer index is literally a byte. Above that they score candidates independently and then pick, which is what you'd do if the head can only address 255 options at once.
- "Mathematically can't make type errors" just means the output layer is defined over the schema. There's no string to parse because there's no string.
After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI?
I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev
• 20-200x faster
• 40-400x cheaper (w/ output tokens free)
• Frontier composable intelligence optimized for decisions
AFAICT the shortest path to AI-based economic revolution
the problem with the Higgsfield After Effects harness / skill is that the greatest issue in automating motion design is After Effects itself, and most problems go away if you just decide not to use it at all.