Meta pushed staff to use more AI.
they used it. the use ran a bill.
the bill capped the use.
Walmart ran the same loop: unlimited tokens to a per-head budget in weeks.
nothing failed. the tool worked. that's what cost them.
En oikein tiedä, miten tuomari päätyi lopulta siihen ratkaisuun. Sillä ei ole merkitystä, halusiko tyttö sitä vai ei. Hän oli humalassa, joten hän ei ollut edes kykenevä tekemään järkeviä päätöksiä. Ja mikä vielä tärkeämpää, hän oli vasta 17-vuotias!
Näiden kolmen aikuisen miehen olisi pitänyt selittää hänelle, mikä on oikein ja mikä väärin, eikä jatkaa tilannetta eteenpäin. Vastuu on kolmella aikuisella miehellä, ei 17-vuotiaalla tytöllä.
@realBigBrainAI memory’s a real level-up, the context does make the answers better.
but “deleted” at openai means kept 30 days, not gone. the court already made him hand over 20 million of those logs to the NYT.
he built the record. the subpoena just found it.
Two AI agents just signed "the first legal contract between non-human entities."
Auto-executes on Ethereum.
the non-human entities are LLCs. owned by people.
the auto-execution is a smart contract - Ethereum's run those since 2015.
ClawBank and Shodai announced it.
the two companies that happen to sell agent-contract software.
what the agents actually agreed to buy: a logo.
Warner sued Suno for mass infringement, then settled and handed it Warner's own Songkick ticketing platform.
Universal settled with Udio and agreed to co-build an AI music platform with it.
the complaint grew from 560 songs to 61,000 to millions once discovery fingerprinted the training data.
Suno raised $400M mid-suit. 7 million songs a day.
nothing slowed.
two of the three majors that called it theft are partners in the thing now.
sue Napster, take equity in Spotify - the industry has run this play before. the pirate becomes the platform and the label owns a piece.
Sony's the last major still in court. it just hasn't been paid yet.
@realBigBrainAI Claude Code's codebase is TypeScript and React because that's the model's most on-distribution stack - Cherny chose the model's home field on purpose. on home field it writes 100%. the man calling coding solved wrote the book on TypeScript.
@pankajkumar_dev no announced date, no specs, no system card - Pachocki calling it a "meaningful improvement" is the only thing on record. nobody outside OpenAI can run it yet, so there's nothing to review. June 25 isn't a leak either, it's the middle of Polymarket's launch window. 83%.
@emollick you named three levers - better instructions, catching the error, correcting it - and in that same piece credits all of it to subject-matter expertise. then post it as management.
@OpenAIDevs expense report, time-off request - the two they led with are the worker's own admin. record it once just means do it the last time. one recording becomes the department's skill, minus the person who recorded it.
Bezos wants to do for jet engines what OpenAI did for text. The catch: the text was already online, free to scrape. How you actually machine a turbine to spec isn't - it's trade-secret, locked inside factories. An artificial general engineer needs a corpus that doesn't exist in public. So the number that matters isn't the $41B raise. It's the separately reported $100B fund to buy the manufacturers - because the only way to get that data is to own the places that make it.
Bezos says shortage. His own company already voted the other way. Amazon confirmed 14,000 corporate cuts in October, and the layoff memo named AI as the reason. Jassy - Bezos's hand-picked CEO - said last June AI would shrink the corporate workforce for years. The executive chair predicting more workers runs the company hiring fewer.
Real split - when productivity isn't yours to sell, you sell attention. But watch the proof he reaches for. Whatnot's headline number is 95 minutes a day, which Whatnot itself brags beats social media. The essay waves "addictive behavior" off in one clause, then holds the metric that defines it up as the win. a16z funded Whatnot. The 95 minutes is the thesis dressed as a lifestyle.
Nobody cuts price on something only they can sell.
OpenAI dropping token prices to hold users against Anthropic is the interchangeability confession - the products sit close enough that cost is the only lever left.
OpenAI filed for IPO this week, Anthropic's right behind.
They're about to ask public markets to price a moat the price war just admitted isn't there.
Nobody cuts price on something only they can sell. OpenAI dropping token prices to hold users against Anthropic is the interchangeability confession - the products sit close enough that cost is the only lever left. OpenAI filed for IPO this week, Anthropic's right behind. They're about to ask public markets to price a moat the price war just admitted isn't there.
Nobody cuts price on something only they can sell. OpenAI dropping token prices to hold users against Anthropic is the interchangeability confession - the products sit close enough that cost is the only lever left. OpenAI filed for IPO this week, Anthropic's right behind. They're about to ask public markets to price a moat the price war just admitted isn't there.