Chgenf1991

Europe first (including Canada).

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@RealPNavarro I think the good people of Canada can make up their own minds.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@IngrahamAngle Not exactly. He is widely recognized as one of the finest economists and central bankers of his generation.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@Sierraton2020 @ztisdale Actually. Any Bari country can have bases there. Also, Greenland and Denmark can veto any US purchases or investments. Again. If you read the agreement, you might understand more.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@Sierraton2020 @ztisdale No. They are building some military bases as set out in the agreement. You didn't read the agreement. I get that you may not be able to understand it. You may not be a lawyer.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@ztisdale @MarkJCarney Read the treaty. It is not just the US who must approve sensitive investments and new military bases, beyond those expressly mentioned, but also both Denmark and Greenland.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@CallVoter @MarkJCarney Actually it does, if you read the treaty. NATO is designated as a partner of Arctic security and is used to define, along with the EU, the list of countries that doesn't need Danish, Greenlandic and US approval for military installations or sensitive investments.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@NoDMsPerfavore Greenland remains autonomous and part of Denmark. The US gets rights fur military bases, which it already had, and maybe some say in investments. Trump lost big time

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@CecileShaw Yawn. Except that Belarus has already confirmed that it doesn't have the capacity. Their potash is already spoken for by contract with China.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@YoungStreete Yawn. Except that Belarus has already confirmed that it doesn't have the capacity. Their potash is already spoken for by contract with China.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@JayGenXer You need to be better informed.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@MarcNixon24 Yawn. Except that Belarus has already confirmed that it doesn't have the capacity. Their potash is already spoken for by contract with China.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@JayGenXer Except that Belarus has already confirmed that it doesn't have the capacity. Their potash is already spoken for by contract with China.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@CanadaRoast Except that Belarus has already confirmed that it doesn't have the capacity. Their potash is already spoken for by contract with China.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@myabradshaw78 Except that Belarus has already confirmed that it doesn't have the capacity. Their potash is already spoken for by contract with China.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@MistyOJernigan Except that Belarus has already confirmed that it doesn't have the capacity. Their potash is already spoken for by contract with China.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@KirkWillia13546 Except that Belarus has already confirmed that it doesn't have the capacity. Their potash is already spoken for by contract with China.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@ChadimirPoutine Except that Belarus has already confirmed that it doesn't have the capacity. Their potash is already spoken for by contract with China.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@NicD903 Except that Belarus has already confirmed that it doesn't have the capacity. Their potash is already spoken for by contract with China.

[Chgenf1991 @EdLF12345]

@RiseOfAlberta Except that Belarus has already confirmed that it doesn't have the capacity. Their potash is already spoken for by contract with China.